It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I don't think the election is going to stop the release of information from Wikileaks no matter which way the cookie crumbles.
On the eve of the election, it is important to restate why we have published what we have.
The right to receive and impart true information is the guiding principle of WikiLeaks – an organization that has a staff and organizational mission far beyond myself. Our organization defends the public’s right to be informed.
This is why, irrespective of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election, the real victor is the US public which is better informed as a result of our work.
*Note: Sara drafting separate email about Benghazi fundraising emails and blog post. *
originally posted by: flatbush71
Outstanding !!! Carry on.
An informed public is the greatest weapon of democracy.
Buck
I have to be at cap at 3 though for that crazy Lade De Rothschild person
Maybe because she said she wanted to work with Trump ,he could give her the Ambassadors job in Lybia and double up on the security team she provided for Stephens .
But now it just feels like they are picking on an old lady nd her horny old husband.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: ThoughtIsMadness
Maybe because she said she wanted to work with Trump ,he could give her the Ambassadors job in Lybia and double up on the security team she provided for Stephens .
But now it just feels like they are picking on an old lady nd her horny old husband.
At the same time, we cannot publish what we do not have. To date, we have not received information on Donald Trump’s campaign, or Jill Stein’s campaign, or Gary Johnson’s campaign or any of the other candidates that fufills our stated editorial criteria.