Whats going on at yellowstone?, page 235
Pages: <<  232    233    234    235    236    237    238  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 469 times


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 11:24 AM by Ponyboy_86
Originally posted by rayleo
reply to
post by Aphelion


You know, I struggle with this thought, because for me it is true. It is the reason why any conspiracy tantalizes me.

I think that it is the desire for science fiction to become non fiction...for the impossible to become reality. And also to finally get the worst over with so that I can be through on the other side. Instead of simply buy groceries for another week I can stock up on water for the big disaster. So, it also gives me a reason to go through the motions of daily life.

Twisted? Yes. But I suspect that everyone on ATS might have a little but of this too. We'll be ready, because we dared to imagine the possibility.

im with u bro im stocking up on water and food. im not about to sit there and deny everything like some ppl do. ill eat it eventually im not wasting my money if nothing happens woopty do but if it does ill be straight.



reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 11:28 AM by Aphelion
reply to post by Ponyboy_86



Actually, you'd also do yourself a favor - (if you aren't already educated on it - kudos if you are) on how to survive in the wild. You know - live off of the wildlife and undergrowth. There would be no preparation for something of this magnitude other than that. A drop or two of bleach in large amounts of water is a good purifier....



reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 11:37 AM by RFBurns
Originally posted by littleflower
Why would it need to deflect at all? It is information - it can be sent to several places simulataneously. I am not understanding this.


If the sensors detect something byond a certian threshold level, sort of like an overflow warning light on a water tank that shuts off the water flow, the system they use puts that data into a priority mode, and feeds that data only to their systems for immediate analysis. This is to simply prevent the sensors from being overloaded sending data out to the public access systems, and prevents any possible loss of that data that needs to go to the geologists systems. Its just a measure put into the system to prevent any critical data loss from the sensors. A very valuable measure I should point out.

Like any server on the web, or bandwidth monitoring system, the systems used to collect the data can detect how much data is being pulled off the sensors. If it reaches a certian point during a critical time that they need a clear path to get this data, the system will turn off the data feed to the secondary system..ie the public access systems and readers, and send that data directly to the critical systems for analysis.

With all the recent activity and the monitoring going on by the public, its understandable that particularly now, they would have that bandwidth monitoring system making sure that the data goes where it needs to go first, then pass it on to the other systems.




Cheers!!!!


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 11:40 AM by Ptolomeo
reply to post by dreams n chains



That would have been a story that could have cause panic...


Regards,
Ptolomeo



reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 11:40 AM by Ponyboy_86
Originally posted by MagicaRose
reply to
post by xoxo stacie



I just now posted about the new vent.
Hope someone else notices it besdes me and you.

www.livescience.com...
interesting... i think we're seeing a pattern here. someone also said im sorry i dont have a source but someone said recently its nothing to worry about unless u see alot of new gaysers and old ones that havent been erupting erupting. and i know i read a news item that said that thats exactly what was happenning more lately (like dec 08 jan 09)


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 11:44 AM by Ptolomeo
reply to post by Ponyboy_86



well, I do not think that we will see new ones... At least not if you go there yourself to check or if they broadcast them on their webcams...

Do you think we would have direct access to any new important event?

We even are having doubts with the information given in relation with the earthquakes...

Regards,
Ptolomeo


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 11:49 AM by quakewatcher
Originally posted by RFBurns
Originally posted by littleflower
Why would it need to deflect at all? It is information - it can be sent to several places simulataneously. I am not understanding this.


If the sensors detect something byond a certian threshold level, sort of like an overflow warning light on a water tank that shuts off the water flow, the system they use puts that data into a priority mode, and feeds that data only to their systems for immediate analysis. This is to simply prevent the sensors from being overloaded sending data out to the public access systems, and prevents any possible loss of that data that needs to go to the geologists systems. Its just a measure put into the system to prevent any critical data loss from the sensors. A very valuable measure I should point out.

Like any server on the web, or bandwidth monitoring system, the systems used to collect the data can detect how much data is being pulled off the sensors. If it reaches a certian point during a critical time that they need a clear path to get this data, the system will turn off the data feed to the secondary system..ie the public access systems and readers, and send that data directly to the critical systems for analysis.

With all the recent activity and the monitoring going on by the public, its understandable that particularly now, they would have that bandwidth monitoring system making sure that the data goes where it needs to go first, then pass it on to the other systems.


This still makes no sense at all to me. After all, the interwebs are not a series of tubes... There is no reason why you can't have this information on multiple servers, and public access should not effect private systems in any way. This decentralization is the beauty of the internet.

If you look at the Old Faithful helicorder this morning, there's clearly some clipping going on.

www.seis.utah.edu...


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 11:52 AM by Ponyboy_86
reply to post by Aphelion


yea wild and maybe surviving nuclear winter? now that i think about it, that might be more likely to happen plus nuclear winter is much like volcano winter in some ways. i gotta get on to reading that instead of reading this thread. i cant keep up and most of it is arguments about irrelevant stuff.
Pages: <<  232    233    234    235    236    237    238  >>    ^^TOP^^



Lake Vostok Antarctica: breakthrough imminent.
  Posted 10 days ago with 175 member flags
Sky Sounds 1/25/2012 Atlanta, GA Personal Video/Audio
  Posted 17 days ago with 146 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 6 days ago with 134 member flags
Volcano in Iceland Erupting Alongside The Aurora Borealis (pics)
  Posted 7 days ago with 121 member flags
6 of the oldest trees from around the world.
  Posted 10 days ago with 108 member flags
West Coast USA: Pay Attention, Cascadia May Be Ready to Rupture
  Posted 8 days ago with 87 member flags
CONFIRMED: Global Warming \'Ended 15 Years Ago\'
  Posted 14 days ago with 75 member flags
Pictures from the Aurora lightshow
  Posted 18 days ago with 73 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

AP: WHITNEY HOUSTON DEAD
  People, Posted 13 hours ago, 95 replies
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Political Ideology, Posted 14 hours ago, 70 replies
IF YOURE AMERICAN!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 32 replies
London 2012 Olympics Conspiracy
  General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 29 replies
Whitney Houston dead at 48
  Breaking General News, Posted 12 hours ago, 26 replies