Originally posted by RFBurns
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Originally posted by RFBurns
It just simply means its not on the public servers.
Umm, no it does not. Do you understand the concept of triangulating events between the webicorders and gee? What you are saying makes no sense. The webicorders and Gee may be delayed a few seconds, yes, but after they release the stream, or alternatively, they publish the update to the various webicorders graphs, it is easy to confirm- or in this case, deny- events. You are trying to make a case in the same breath that they are altering the data stream coming into gee and pulling out events, and feeding us relative flat lines instead? Lol, and I thought I was confused.
Ok let me clarify it for you.
The data you are so hung over that is not present on the public server system is simply just that..not on the public servers. That does not mean that their database is on that same system that the public uses. How confusing can that be to understand my friend? It really isnt.
There are two systems. Their database, and the public database. Their database gets the data first, priority. The public database gets it second, secondary. The two are completely isolated and seperate systems.
This means that if something is not on the public system, it is simply not there on the public system. That does not mean that it is also missing on their system and database.
Im not sure you are fully understanding that concept. They have to have the data, we dont. That public access system is for public benefit, public use, public curiosity, and public consumption. It is not intended to be used as a scientific database for the geologists and volcanologists who require their own database and systems to collect, store and process the data.
This one missing 3.2 Montana data is not anything to cry wolf over. I am simply trying to tell you how their system works and what happens when they consider data to be priority, and what happens when that data is prioritized.
Triangulating other sources is one way you can try to ascertain what might be in that particular area. Again, that is for your benefit, not the scientific analysis that is priority over public benefit for the "ooh ahh" factor.
Be glad they got the data and are analyzing it and trying to determine if there is a need to warn people. Heaven forbid that someone start crying that they didnt do anything about it. Well they are doing something about it, and doing it quite well IMO. Let me stress this point once again.....its a good thing that the system puts that data into priority mode and sends it where it needs to go so that the proper people who actually know far better than any of us out here how to decyper it and anlyize it and put 2 and 2 together from it.
If you like, contact the USGS office in Montana and file a complaint. I am sure they will stop what they are doing to address your concern over 1 piece of data that you dont have, but that they themselves do have.
Cheers!!!!
omg lol no good one thanks for the laugh



