It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xoxo stacie
I just noticed why they are so focused on that geyser in the backround on the live cam.... it isnt snow covered like the rest of them. The whole mound which judging by the size in the pic is rather large is bare of snow. Its not going off like mad either....
Originally posted by quakewatcher
Originally posted by xoxo stacie
I just noticed why they are so focused on that geyser in the backround on the live cam.... it isnt snow covered like the rest of them. The whole mound which judging by the size in the pic is rather large is bare of snow. Its not going off like mad either....
It was going off, earlier.
On the snow melt front, I don't think it's necessarily a big deal. I saw lots of bare snow this weekend, then more snow would fall, then geysers would go off again and the snow would melt. It makes sense that if it's snowing on and off there will often be fresh snow to melt when the geysers go off, and it will look like new snow melt if you haven't been watching the cam for a long time. You'd really need to monitor snow levels for weeks at a time (at least) to be able to tell much from the web cam. (Y'know, unless there's suddenly a big flash and the camera appears to melt. )
Originally posted by quakewatcher
Originally posted by RFBurns
Originally posted by littleflower
Why would it need to deflect at all? It is information - it can be sent to several places simulataneously. I am not understanding this.
If the sensors detect something byond a certian threshold level, sort of like an overflow warning light on a water tank that shuts off the water flow, the system they use puts that data into a priority mode, and feeds that data only to their systems for immediate analysis. This is to simply prevent the sensors from being overloaded sending data out to the public access systems, and prevents any possible loss of that data that needs to go to the geologists systems. Its just a measure put into the system to prevent any critical data loss from the sensors. A very valuable measure I should point out.
Like any server on the web, or bandwidth monitoring system, the systems used to collect the data can detect how much data is being pulled off the sensors. If it reaches a certian point during a critical time that they need a clear path to get this data, the system will turn off the data feed to the secondary system..ie the public access systems and readers, and send that data directly to the critical systems for analysis.
With all the recent activity and the monitoring going on by the public, its understandable that particularly now, they would have that bandwidth monitoring system making sure that the data goes where it needs to go first, then pass it on to the other systems.
This still makes no sense at all to me. After all, the interwebs are not a series of tubes... There is no reason why you can't have this information on multiple servers, and public access should not effect private systems in any way. This decentralization is the beauty of the internet.
If you look at the Old Faithful helicorder this morning, there's clearly some clipping going on.
www.seis.utah.edu...
Originally posted by pantangele
reply to post by Aphelion
Speaking of which, if the trend continues, we should see "Top Secret Geyser" in five to ten minutes.
Originally posted by pantangele
reply to post by Mushussu
There it is. Only about 32 minutes this time... Let's see how long it goes.
Originally posted by Aphelion
reply to post by MadDogtheHunter
It's a conspiracy man. Just like the Detroit Lions. We all know they're paid to suck on purpose.