It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As a body of water, a kill is a creek. The word comes from the Middle Dutch kille, meaning "riverbed" or "water channel." The modern Dutch term is kil.
Originally posted by CaptChaos
Originally posted by beanandginger
You can apply the exact same logic to the assasination of both JF & Bobby Kennedy....and you'll find that the same groups are responsible - the military industrial complex who profits from foreign wars, the bankers who bankroll them and the Congress who facilitate it all.
Even more, you find the SAME PEOPLE involved, and the same fingerprints all over. For example, George HW Bush was in Dallas on November 23, 1963. Just happened to be there.
Originally posted by GodIsPissed
reply to post by comprehension
Fresh kills also means...fresh kills.
I mean,you can put nice little bow on crap..but it's still crap!
And why were they allowed to get rid of 80% of the steel without examination?It's a crime no matter who did it!So why was the evidence allowed to be destroyed?I never understood that!
Larry Silverstein, the wealthy property owner and developer who held the lease on the World Trade Center properties, was due to work that morning of September 11, 2001, in the temporary offices of his company, Silverstein Properties, on the 88th floor of the North Tower. But he had a problem; he had a dermatologist appointment that morning, too. According to Silverstein, his wife “laid down the law” and told him he could not miss the doctors appointment. Therefore, Silverstein was not at the World Trade Center when the planes hit. Two of Silverstein’s children, his son, Roger, and daughter, Lisa, would regularly attend meetings with important clients at Windows on the World. That morning, they too were running late and were not at Windows when the planes hit. All three Silverstein’s survived, leading conspiracy theorists to assume that they had advance knowledge of the attacks and deliberately stayed away from the WTC buildings that day. Silverstein did lose four employees in the attack; two of them had just been hired.
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
I think it's not viewed as a crime because it's obviously a terrorist attack.
The media knew who was responsible, unequivocably within hours. So why ever question it?
Originally posted by comprehension
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
I think it's not viewed as a crime because it's obviously a terrorist attack.
The media knew who was responsible, unequivocably within hours. So why ever question it?
It was a crime made to look like a terrorist attack. What, you only think plots like that happen in movies? No wait, bad example...
edit on 31-12-2011 by comprehension because: comma
Originally posted by hooper
Don't forget they were testifying before the legislature. Their testimony was voluntary, not compelled. Testifying under oath would give the impression that they had been compelled to testify. That would place the legislature in a superior position. There was also the matter of executive privilege wherein advisers to the President should not be compelled to answer questions regarding non-criminal matters that were discussed with the Chief Executive.
Originally posted by samkent
Why is it that only a few people on a conspiracy site see the proof? Are you better than the other 99.9% of the population?
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
Originally posted by comprehension
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
I think it's not viewed as a crime because it's obviously a terrorist attack.
The media knew who was responsible, unequivocably within hours. So why ever question it?
It was a crime made to look like a terrorist attack. What, you only think plots like that happen in movies? No wait, bad example...
edit on 31-12-2011 by comprehension because: comma
Sometimes crazy things just happen. You got to just accept it and move on.
Excuse me......but when is a Terrorist attack not a crime?