It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by UM_Gazz
And does 0.02 Yeld Kt. count?
Originally posted by onlyinmydreams
So RDube is now our equivalent of Jacques Derrida???
Now... to make the above joke clear, Derrida was a french philosopher who introduced the concept of 'deconstructionsim' into intellectual discourse. Though this philosophical movement sputtered into a lot of inane, useless things when it came to political/ethical issues... it still is a major influence in literature and -- of high importance for this situation -- the literature of anthropology.
Basically, ol' Jacques argued that you had to take apart everything someone says and look at the conditions that made them say it.... while keeping in mind that the very same person was constructing an argument/work of art/military log, etc based on their incomplete worldview. To cut to the chase.... this means that whenever you analyze a text you have to take apart the elements that went into it and consider it not as a whole... but as a sum of parts.
Now... looking at the Serpo story... there is nothing, so far, that screams fraud to anyone who claims to be a skilled writer. This is because all of the 'smoking gun' observations have UTTERLY FAILED to take into consideration the forces that went into the 'construction' of this story. They have also failed to try to comperehend the psychology of the writer... and how he probably laid out his original text.
Let me be blunt... we are not looking at the original journal entries. We are looking at the entries as transcribed by Anon that were sent to Bill Ryan... and that were, in turn, posted on his website. Think about that. Think about how basic text in such a situation is going to get moved out of place. Think about how 'Team Leader' might have TITLED an entry with the main theme of the day and then went on to describe those events. If such an entry was typed out and then emailed... wouldn't the original format always get lost????
Seriously, guys, all of this supposedly 'scholarly' debunkment is completely amateur. All of the negative analysis I have seen, so far, has completely missed issues regarding point of view, errors in textual transmission, and any attempt to really analyze the material. This is just another ATS exercise in seeing who can make assertions with the loudest voice.
Originally posted by Cutwolf
"They took all 308s blood, that was without my approval. I wrote about that in log 3888. We had a very tense situation with the Ebens about that."
--End Log Entry--
--Log Entry 3888 start--
"When we traveled to the building housing 308s body, we were confronted by several Ebens. Ebe1 showed up and I explained that we wanted the body of 308."
Interesting point, but then it would have made sense for "Anon" to have broke them down as such instead of clumping them together. It is the same journal entry.
[edit on 28-1-2006 by Cutwolf]
Originally posted by onlyinmydreams
So RDube is now our equivalent of Jacques Derrida???
Originally posted by Valhall
Well, if we're in that phase now, I guess I could share this info I found on the 20th. I'm not implying anything, just sharing.
Bill Ryan of London is a Science Fiction writer
www.locusmag.com...
www.amazon.com...
Originally posted by Bill Ryan
6) I believe there will be more information. If you do not want to receive it on this forum, let me know.
1) I'm not a science fiction writer. Whomever someone dug up is not me. Check it out, please, before starting wild rumors. That's a serious request because that kind of mud tends to stick and it's actually not at all fair if the accusation is not true. I would be personally grateful if someone could look into it and show that that person is not me.
Originally posted by Bill Ryan
6) I believe there will be more information. If you do not want to receive it on this forum, let me know.
Originally posted by rdube02
Originally posted by onlyinmydreams
So RDube is now our equivalent of Jacques Derrida???
Given your track record of attacking anyone who has offered a "debunk" theory, I do not take your last post to heart. Thanks for offering your opinion though - I will give it much consideration as I sit here waiting for that elusive picture of Eben children playing soccer. I can't wait.
-rdube02
Originally posted by Bill Ryan
1) I'm not a science fiction writer. Whomever someone dug up is not me. Check it out, please, before starting wild rumors. That's a serious request because that kind of mud tends to stick and it's actually not at all fair if the accusation is not true. I would be personally grateful if someone could look into it and show that that person is not me.
My personal details:
Full name: William James Vincent Ryan
Date of birth: 23 February 1953
Current address: Bristol, England – previously (for many years) in Scotland.
You already have my photo online.
Originally posted by Centrist
You've been a gentleman and a thoughtful messenger for this information. Although I'm only one voice here, I would like you to continue to post the information here. Your efforts and steady, unbiased delivery of the message has brought a refreshing air of respectability to the concept that this could be disclosure, even at times when the information itself, at first glance, appears to be problematic.
Originally posted by OCD DETECTIVE
SciFi Author’s Bill Ryan & Charles Ryan were born in 1956 & 1946 respectively.
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Well personally I would have considered the facts about Zeta 1 and Zeta 2 that were wrong the smoking gun.
There is no third Star in the system.
I would not call a foul now just because of something as trivial as inconsistencies in the text.
Originally posted by Centrist
Bill:
You've been a gentleman and a thoughtful messenger for this information. Although I'm only one voice here, I would like you to continue to post the information here. Your efforts and steady, unbiased delivery of the message has brought a refreshing air of respectability to the concept that this could be disclosure, even at times when the information itself, at first glance, appears to be problematic.
The fine folks here at ATS will continue to pick this apart, put it back together, and find the most interesting bits for us to play with.