It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tigertatzen
originally posted by: chris_stibrany
Based on the fact that the whole abortion message fit nothing at all about the federal government and the petrodollar and our wars, there are two options:
1. He put all those things in there JUST to gain attention and then fooled us with abolition message because he wanted to get attention for his abortion message.
2. The whole thing was actually supposed to be about the petrodollar and economy like we thought, but the site got hacked and the anomalous abortion video was inserted in place of the 'real' message.
What say you?
Or, option #3: He deliberately made the video to cover his own ass, make himself look like just another kook to anyone who might have had him under surveillance. But he left clues in his art, breadcrumbs, that could be recognizable to certain people who are able to put them together and discern a hidden message.
originally posted by: Mousygretchen
a reply to: tigertatzen
But this thread has taught me to be skeptical and to not jump to any conclusions until I have all my ducks in a row.
a reply to: Ruiner1978
"Every time you research or look into these things, you're killing babies'
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: tigertatzen
originally posted by: chris_stibrany
Based on the fact that the whole abortion message fit nothing at all about the federal government and the petrodollar and our wars, there are two options:
1. He put all those things in there JUST to gain attention and then fooled us with abolition message because he wanted to get attention for his abortion message.
2. The whole thing was actually supposed to be about the petrodollar and economy like we thought, but the site got hacked and the anomalous abortion video was inserted in place of the 'real' message.
What say you?
Or, option #3: He deliberately made the video to cover his own ass, make himself look like just another kook to anyone who might have had him under surveillance. But he left clues in his art, breadcrumbs, that could be recognizable to certain people who are able to put them together and discern a hidden message.
No, I don't think this is the case at all.
But your reply to me did get me thinking about an earlier post by someone else.
If there is something more to this then it is a psy op.
One to put people off looking into these things.
That would be the ultimate guilt trip would it not?
"Every time you research or look into these things, you're killing babies'"
Holy #! My brain hurts...
originally posted by: Mousygretchen
a reply to: Ruiner1978
"Every time you research or look into these things, you're killing babies'
That doesn't even make sense.
originally posted by: Mousygretchen
a reply to: tigertatzen
We have to walk a fine line between being complete skeptics and believing everything we read, of course.
originally posted by: vlawde
Sometimes a religious zealot/anti abortionist fanatic is just a religious zealot/anti abortionist fanatic
All the seemingly hidden symbols/messages etc were just to get people interested in following this, just a red herring to deliver his message
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Mousygretchen
a reply to: Ruiner1978
"Every time you research or look into these things, you're killing babies'
That doesn't even make sense.
Does it not?
We've spent the last week or so delving into this mystery, putting things together, speculating on what may be. Then the timer hits zero and BAM we're guilt tripped into feeling responsible for every abortion.
That's some proper conditioning right there.
originally posted by: Mousygretchen
a reply to: Ruiner1978
"Every time you research or look into these things, you're killing babies'
That doesn't even make sense.
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
a reply to: tigertatzen
Did I just get mind #ed?
originally posted by: tigertatzen
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
a reply to: tigertatzen
Did I just get mind #ed?
Lol...how do you mean? Aside from the giant mind #ing we all got, sans lube, from Mr Teeth, that is...
I've gone a complete 180 with what I think about this about 4 times
originally posted by: tigertatzen
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: Mousygretchen
a reply to: Ruiner1978
"Every time you research or look into these things, you're killing babies'
That doesn't even make sense.
Does it not?
We've spent the last week or so delving into this mystery, putting things together, speculating on what may be. Then the timer hits zero and BAM we're guilt tripped into feeling responsible for every abortion.
That's some proper conditioning right there.
Especially considering the extreme graphic nature of the images...a lot of people cannot handle that and will simply turn away. As a deterrent, it would be quite effective.
originally posted by: Witness2008
I'm not sure if the use of corporate logos and branding promoting the beast bills has been addressed here, but I would think that the statutory guidelines for fair use would not apply here. I wonder what lengths if any were taken by Russell to protect himself from any possible litigation. He used a lot of company logos as enticement to convey a particular idea. If my brand had been misused in that manner I would be seeking legal advice.
The beast bills, the web-sites, the design and execution were by far superior to the empty, angry rant at the end. There are many other things at work here.