It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Noncompatible
Playing ?
It is a contest ? Sorry I did not realise "one-upmanship drive" had been engaged.
I think you believe I dismiss your faith lightly. I do not dismiss any ones faith lightly. I find it fascinating. I simply encourage independent thought. For if you can question and still believe then your (or anyones) faith will be stronger for it.
I questioned. I (in your eyes) was found wanting. I am however at peace with myself. That after all is the desired result is it not ?
Originally posted by ReVoLuTiOn76
"....there has always been one God, but do you see Him smiting people in the same and vengeful way as He did in the Old Testament?
I'm a Christian and it has bugged me since childhood that the God of the Old Testament seems to be entirely different from the God whom Jesus describes as his father...and ours. I have spent hours studying threads and leads on ATS outlining various explanations for this very glaring difference between the OT God and NT God. I'm of the opinion that the truth possibly can be found if you bring all the old holy books together, such as the Torah, Bible, Koran and possibly other books or documents I've never heard of. I'm sure we've lost a lot of original meaning in translation, too. I do what I can to follow Christ's example and teachings as I think they are beautiful, truthful and sufficient to guide me in this life and into the next. But that doesn't mean I think I know the whole story by any means or that I could explain it to you. I never found a church that could explain the difference between OT God and NT God, either. I got a lot of vague fluff as answers.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by ReVoLuTiOn76
I agree that Jesus was a man of peace. But the Bible cleary makes statements advocating violence against people who do not fall into the faith. And lets not forget that the "Christian" God is the same God of old testement. Can you follow faith in Jesus (God in human form) when God is cleary in favor of violence against non-believers?
Ahh. Ok the answer is no it is not ok. Jesus himself took the time to make the point we who follow him must not point our fingers in judgement. He knew our human natures would lead us to do that and do it often! Anyway I don't go pointing my fingers at Islam except to object when it, like my own religion are used to justify atrocities. I will denounce injustice when I see it, even in my own faith. I'm aware my Bible depicts atrocities in it and some are even supposedly directed by God. But Jesus shows himself and the God who is his father to be of a different character.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
I have read many thought-provoking statements so far and I thank you all.
The original point to my OP was the similarity between the Bible and the Quran in that some of its text can be taken as advocting violence against non-believers and sinners. With that in mind, is it correct for modern-Christians/Jews to point fingers at Islam and the Quran and claim they are a religion of violence, when they have violence attatched to their religion as well?
I am not claiming that one religion is better than the other. I am only questioning the obvious hypocrisy by all religions, and how they all have a history of violence, and the texts to go along with it.
[edit on 3-8-2010 by sheepslayer247]
Originally posted by thegoodearth
reply to post by adjensen
While the Old Testament was B.C., I find your response a little troubling.
I am not trying to being any kind of argument of theology with you, please know that... I just respectfully disagree with you about the veracity of the Old Testament teachings...
The Old Testament is very relevant for us today. I think that many Christians have never given deep thought to the subject. However, Paul's letters to the different churches are the earliest New Testament writings. Actually, the Gospels were written after Paul's letters, chronologically.
Originally posted by Kapyong
What we have is STORIES written by unknown people who never met anyone IN the stories.
we do NOT have even ONE authentic claim to have met Jesus :
Originally posted by Kapyong
Gday,
Originally posted by ReVoLuTiOn76
We believe in Christ because the Apostles of Christ believed what they saw with their own eyes.
Wrong.
There were NO eye-witnesses to Jesus.
Not ONE of the books in the NT was written by anone who met a historical Jesus.
Originally posted by Kapyong
Peter, if he even existed, believed a STORY about Jesus without evidence.
Just like faithful believers now believe stories about Jesus.
Without evidence.
Originally posted by nlouise
The dividing line between Islam and Judism was Jacob and Esau (sp?). Jacob was given the blessing, Esau despised it. To this day both Jacob (Judism/Israel) and Esau (Islam) are at war with each other.
Going back to history, of course we know that Jesus spoke Aramaic. He may have spoken in Greek especially to the Pharisees but he used his native tongue to teach the Jews. According to Fr. Diarmuid, Aramaic is a very elaborate language which was difficult to translate directly into Greek. It is a spoken language and its written form, Hebrew, contains vocabularies which do not have direct translation in Greek. Therefore, so much of the real words of Jesus became lost in translation.
Originally posted by adjensen
reply to post by sheepslayer247
You are quoting the Old Testament, Jewish Law. Christians are not reconciled to God through the Bible, but through the person of Jesus Christ. The Old Testament is part of the Bible as ancient testimony to the divinity of Christ, not because Christians are held to the Torah law. Christ says that, to become reconciled to God, we need only "Love God and love each other." Period.
If you have gripes with the Torah, talk to the people who wrote it, who are not Christians.
Originally posted by thegoodearth
reply to post by adjensen
But that isn't what it says. Jesus clearly repeats the Commandments of God to the young man. He clearly instructs him. There is no ambiguity to his words. It is plain and simple what he says. If he wanted him to love thy neighbor as thyself and love God, wouldn't he have simply just said that, instead of stating the Commandments, then ordering him to sell his goods to "store up treasure" in heaven? He is not speaking in a parable, so there isn't a story of ambuguity to try and "figure out" what he means. He states exactly what he means.
Sounds like a reach to find a way to get it to say what you want it to say.
However, I don't rely on my own fallible interpretation of the Bible.
Anyway, I have enjoyed discussing these points with you~ and I certainly can agree to disagree with you on matters of faith, after all, we both love Christ, and that is what is important~
God Bless
God Bless~
Originally posted by balon0
I was doing some searching regarding whether if any of the gospels met Jesus in person when they wrote the NT and found out that the answer was no. The NT was written at the end of the 1st century; written by followers of the apostles who did meet Jesus personally.