Palin to replace Steele as GOP Chairperson

reply to post by WhatTheory


I couldn't help but notice you stated a majority of Americans are against gay marriage.

Did you know that a majority of Saudis are against equal rights for women?

Clearly, we must respect majority rule when it pertains to minority rights.

Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
I couldn't help but notice you stated a majority of Americans are against gay marriage.

Did you know that a majority of Saudis are against equal rights for women?

Clearly, we must respect majority rule when it pertains to minority rights.

Huh? What?
Are you in the correct thread? You do realize this thread is about Palin right?
Where did I mention gay marriage in this thread? I guess it's possible since it's a big thread but I don't recall the conversation.

Originally posted by WhatTheory

Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
I couldn't help but notice you stated a majority of Americans are against gay marriage.

Did you know that a majority of Saudis are against equal rights for women?

Clearly, we must respect majority rule when it pertains to minority rights.

Huh? What?

Are you in the correct thread? You do realize this thread is about Palin right?
Where did I mention gay marriage in this thread? I guess it's possible since it's a big thread but I don't recall the conversation.

Here you go. Eat more fish, it helps memory.

Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Eat more fish, it helps memory.

Aw man, you got me. I'm supposed to remember that one little sentence from page 3 which was about a month ago. Pfftt.

Look, find a gay thread if you want to discuss gay issues. This is a Palin thread.
Besides, when do you draw the line at minority. Are we going to give special rights and privledges to people with red hair vs. blond hair or people with different colored eyes? Of course not. So homo's should not get any special treatment when the majority of people voted a certain way.

Originally posted by WhatTheory

Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Eat more fish, it helps memory.

Aw man, you got me. I'm supposed to remember that one little sentence from page 3 which was about a month ago.

Mercy sakes. I wish I could just 'brush-off' being proven wrong like you have 3 times now in this thread alone.

If it wasn't for my itty-bitty sense of integrity.

How do you pronounce that again? Pfffft.

You are a laughing stock.

Your credibility is in question. Palin is moot.

Please attempt to respond MINUS your usual liberal-label smear.

Regards...KK



[edit on 29-7-2009 by kinda kurious]

Originally posted by kinda kurious
Please attempt to respond MINUS your usual liberal-label smear.

Why when the liberal label fits you like a glove.

I think you were born in liberaltown in liberalcity which is part of liberalnation on the continent of liberalica.

reply to post by WhatTheory


And you say I embarrasss my self. That was highly immature coming from someone who insists on civility. Don't ya think? Hilarious.

Actually, I'm personally done with you for now. I am enjoying seeing you get pwnd too much by The WalkingFox on this and the 'Birther' thread.

When you've been proven wrong so many times, it actually ceases to be humorous and borders on pathetic.

Although I've never invoked the "Ignore" function on this site, I think they offer it for posters like you.

Better yet, i think I'll just cut and paste some of your prior BS and sling it right back at ya.

Originally posted by WhatTheory

Do you like embarrassing yourself and showing your immaturity? You are a loser to the highest degree.

Look, if the only thing you are going to spew from your flap trap is garbage in the form of ridicule and nastiness, just keep quiet and don't post anything.

Originally posted by WhatTheory
Instead of trying to justify your rude behavior, just 'man-up' and admit you were wrong and apologize so we can move on.
It's what I would do if I started being rude for no reason like you did above.

Now THIS is fun.




[edit on 29-7-2009 by kinda kurious]

Originally posted by kinda kurious
And you say I embarrasss my self. That was highly immature coming from someone who insists on civility. Don't ya think?

Umm....it's called being facetious. How was that uncivil?
Not much of a sense of humor.

I am enjoying seeing you get pwnd too much by The WalkingFox on this and the 'Birther' thread.
Then you've been proven wrong so many times, it actually ceases to be humorous and borders on pathetic.

Wow, this proves you are deluded with your liberal thoughts.
I'm glad you are done because I'm tired of reading about your delusions.

Only your liberal mind could twist reality in such a way as to think I have been proven wrong. You must be a part of opposite world.

Although I've never invoked the "Ignore" function on this site, I think they offer it for posters like you.

Hello kettle.
You have got some nerve.

You were the one who admitted in a previous post that being civil is boring.

Oh, the irony and hypocrisy.

Big deal, you have learned how to cut/paste comments of mine. Will wonders ever cease. Look, I could fill up 10 pages of your snarky uncivil posts so I don't know what you are trying to prove.

[edit on 7/29/2009 by WhatTheory]

Originally posted by WhatTheory
Look, find a gay thread if you want to discuss gay issues. This is a Palin thread.

I am almost wordless that quote is sooooooo funny.

Is Palin the polar opposite (get it, polar, Alaska) of gay?

Technically, it is no longer about Palin, she is no longer in politics, it is about you (WhatTheory) making false and misleading claims, on more than one occasion.

When done on purpose and repeatedly, by definition: Disinfo.

DENY IGNORANTS. (sic)





[edit on 29-7-2009 by kinda kurious]

Originally posted by kinda kurious
it is about you (WhatTheory) making false and misleading claims, on more than one occasion.

When done on purpose and repeatedly, by definition: Disinfo.

Huh? What? Are you mental?
What on earth are you talking about?
How have I been purposfully making false claims? This is got to hear.
I think you objectivity meter is broken.

Originally posted by WhatTheory

Originally posted by kinda kurious
it is about you (WhatTheory) making false and misleading claims, on more than one occasion.

When done on purpose and repeatedly, by definition: Disinfo.

Huh? What? Are you mental?
What on earth are you talking about?
How have I been purposfully making false claims?

Strike 1 (OP claim) - Wrong.

Originally posted by WhatTheory
Steele will resign on Friday, July 10th during the GOP committee members-only conference call and Sarah Palin will become the new GOP Chairperson.

Sarah Palin will be the new Republican Party Chairperson.

Strike 2 - Wrong.

Originally posted by WhatTheory
The RNC full committe meeting is on 22 July 2009. Apparently some time between the 22nd and Palin's last day as AK Gov. on the 26th, Steele will resign. The full committee votes to elect Palin as the RNC Chairperson after Steele has resigned.

That's TWO in ONE thread alone. Sorry. You are only allowed THREE strikes in baseball.

When you "qualify" these erroneous claims as "rumors/predictions" that you are merely "passing along" that DOES NOT let you off the hook in my book. In fact, it strengthens the disinformation agent case since you are admittedly spreading known "rumors" (hearsay, gossip etc.) Also dubious considering ATS terms & conditions.

You are planting the seeds of lies. Spin that !


[edit on 30-7-2009 by kinda kurious]

Originally posted by kinda kurious
You are planting the seeds of lies.

Wow
If you really think that is purposefully making false statements then you REALLY are mentally handicapped. Using your seriously flawed logic, I guess this entire site called ATS is planting the seeds of lies.

Oh boy, you really went into the garbage can and hurt the tiny bit of credibility you had left with that stretch. If you stretch any further you are going to break. Be careful.

Instead of making more deluded comments, why don't you just let this thread die because I am tired of schooling you. Thanks!

Will you two shut up already?

I swear both of you are acting like little kids.

Originally posted by jd140
Will you two shut up already?

I swear both of you are acting like little kids.

Why don't you mind your own business?
Are you the thread "acting like children" police?

If you don't like it then go to another thread otherwise shut your flap trap. Thanks!

Originally posted by WhatTheory

Originally posted by jd140
Will you two shut up already?

I swear both of you are acting like little kids.

Why don't you mind your own business?

Are you the thread "acting like children" police?

If you don't like it then go to another thread otherwise shut your flap trap. Thanks!

Trying to get you two to act like intelligent adults again. God forbid someone shows you how dumb you two are sounding.

But point made, proceed to act like an a$$.

Originally posted by WhatTheory
Instead of making more deluded comments, why don't you just let this thread die

I WILL let it die. Slowly and with agony.

GOD bless this thread as we sweep our misdeeds under the rug of fading memory.

When an adult makes false claims, they must be held accountable.

In life, there are consequences to our actions. Hopefully it will serve some purpose.
Perhaps Guilt is the Guardian of Goodness.

Why not apologize and move on?
(I believe you had suggested this to me before.)

@ jd140, Sorry. I engage despite my better judgement, like picking at a scab.


[edit on 30-7-2009 by kinda kurious]

Originally posted by kinda kurious
When an adult makes false claims, they must be held accountable.

Again, using your flawed logic, all of ATS must be held accountable right?

I engage despite my better judgement, like picking at a scab.

Instead of engaging, I believe the more correct term would be initiate.

reply to post by WhatTheory


Honestly, I am running out of nice ways to respond without getting banned.

So how about a limerick?

There is a confused poster named WhatTheory,
His political views are quite dreary.

He calls people names, his threads die in flames.

And he wonders why others are leery.


Yeah, I know. Scraping bottom, a topic you are all too familiar with.


[edit on 30-7-2009 by kinda kurious]

Originally posted by kinda kurious
Yeah, I know. Scraping bottom, a topic you are all too familiar with.

Of course I am familiar with because I do actually read all YOUR posts.
Bottom of the barrel baby!

Not sure if this has any bearing in your conversation ...

But according to a new Fox Gnus poll:

Americans think Palin should be a homemaker

Thankfully for the Democrats, this course of action is highly unlikely.