It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Text There is alot of information that WHO andCDC officials have not shared with the public about what forcing worldwide use of a live oral polio for 40 years has done. The Sabin live polio vaccine - whichis the public health community's main claim to fame and fortune in the 20th century - may not only have unleashed the most feared autoimmune disorder to plague man in two centuries ( www.lrb.co.uk... ) as well as caused increases in brain, bone and lung cancers ( jnci.oxfordjournals.org...) but also has created mutant paralytic viruses that could cripple many more humans than would have been crippled if the live virus polio vaccine had never beenused at all.
The US abandoned the Sabin live polio vaccine in 1999 and switched to the inactivated Salk vaccine that cannot cause vaccine strain polio. So why are billions of dollars being spent to pour the risky live virus polio vaccine into the mouths of the poorest babies in the most underprivileged countries in the world where sanitation and water supplies are already compromised?
The worst part of this deception is that WHO and CDC spin doctors are trying to convince parents in Africa, Indiaand elsewhere that it is the "unvaccinated" who are causing vaccine strain polio outbreaks even though many of these children are getting 9or 10 polio vaccinations vaccineawakening.blogspot.com... Although public health officials are trying to blame polio outbreaks on the 'unvaccinated," the medical literature documents that assertion to be false.
Originally posted by pryingopen3rdeye
reply to post by Ex_CT2
it is YOUR OWN right to decide what is injected into your body, for people to criticize that decision is not PRO rights,
those who support forced vaccinations would certainly get some perspective if and when someone wants to forcibly inject them with something they dont want, hence the point of such rights
Originally posted by flashtrum
reply to post by thebtheb
There is a Whooping cough outbreak in the United States directly attributed to the lack of people getting vaccinated against it. ....
Allowing the viruses that cause these outbreaks back into a general population also allows them to mutate, which renders the vaccine useless. We should have NEVER tried to fix what was not broken.
Whooping Cough: Bordetella pertussis - Wikipedia
There does not appear to be a zoonotic reservoir for B. pertussis—humans are its only host.
The bacterium is spread by airborne droplets; its incubation period is seven to 14 days.
Whooping Cough Statistics
During the 6-year period from 1940 through 1945, more than 1 million cases of whooping cough were reported, an average of 175,000 cases per year (incidence of approximately 150 cases per 100,000 population). Following the introduction of the pertussis vaccine in the 1940s, the incidence of whooping cough gradually declined, reaching 15,000 reported cases in 1960 (approximately 8 per 100,000 population). By 1970, the annual incidence was fewer than 5,000 cases per year, and during 1980-1990, an average of 2,900 cases per year were reported (about 1 per 100,000 population).
from eMedTV: Whooping Cough Statistics
Study: Whooping Cough Vaccine Fades In 3 Years
Monday, September 19, 2011
By MIKE STOBBE, AP
The vaccine against whooping cough falters after only about three years, a preliminary study suggests, adding support to school rules requiring kids to get the vaccination periodically.
Originally posted by sweetooth
is nobody interested in my last post?! back in the late 80's i was given a 'vaccination' which was not even a vaccination. Does that concern no-one? fine i'm not raising any of the 'next generation' anyway so why should i careedit on 6-10-2012 by sweetooth because: i am dyselxic
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by thebtheb
base composition keeps changing
Originally posted by pryingopen3rdeye
reply to post by Ex_CT2
it is YOUR OWN right to decide what is injected into your body, for people to criticize that decision is not PRO rights,
those who support forced vaccinations would certainly get some perspective if and when someone wants to forcibly inject them with something they dont want, hence the point of such rights
Originally posted by yorkshirelad
Originally posted by votan
reply to post by thebtheb
flu shot.... the flu won't kill me unless i am very old or a very weak infant..... yet they want me to take a flu shot full of heavy metals... to possibly prevent me from getting a non lethal infection..
thanks but no thanks..
Oh dear, the ignorance. The bird flu outbreak a couple of years back was killing healthy people why ? The answer is that the immune system of these healthy people went into "overdrive" (we can go into in-depth descriptions about T-cells etc but i suspect given the low intelligence of this whole thread it will be way way way over folks heads). Anyhow the immune system went into "overdrive" and basically killed the individual. So if you think you are very healthy and you get bird flu you are MORE likely to die.
This whole thread is great, Darwinism at its best. I look on the bright side and see a more healthy human population once all the paranoid anti-vaccine people die. Shame about their kids having no choice in the matter though.
Just in-case there are some folks who are being led , remember it only takes one case to make a headline and be used as evidence by morons of absolutely anything. It takes thousands of cases to make an assessment of effectiveness. This is a thread of one-off headlines.............
Originally posted by newcovenant
Originally posted by sweetooth
is nobody interested in my last post?! back in the late 80's i was given a 'vaccination' which was not even a vaccination. Does that concern no-one? fine i'm not raising any of the 'next generation' anyway so why should i careedit on 6-10-2012 by sweetooth because: i am dyselxic
Glad you are fine. There's a lot of people on here. Be patient and someone may reply specifically to you. I think the doctors must have felt it would do you more harm in the long run to miss a vaccination than it would to be vaccinated twice. I got a tetanus shot recently although I am pretty sure I had one within the past 10 years but rather than take a chance on tetanus, which can be devastating I got shot up again. Still here.