It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Onewhoknowsjesus
what would jesus do?
Originally posted by Skada
It is a damn shame that I cannot take any vaccines because of the thimerosal.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by Skada
It is a damn shame that I cannot take any vaccines because of the thimerosal.
Most vaccines contain no thimerosal.
Now you can slag the FDA who publish this all you like - but you can also prove them wrong by purchasing any of the ones listed with 0 and finding there is some in it !
In which case you stand to make millions with a court case and incontroversial proof.
And so does anyone else - so if they are ltying about it go get 'em!!
Originally posted by thebtheb
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by Skada
It is a damn shame that I cannot take any vaccines because of the thimerosal.
Most vaccines contain no thimerosal.
That's trace levels in childhood vaccinations under 6, excluding the flu vaccine. It doesn't speak to adult vaccinations, and it doesn't speak to almost all general flu vaccinations.
didn't you mean to say ... 3 indicate an amount greater than 1% ??
and includes 9 Flu vaccines of which 3 contain thimerosal.
Originally posted by Honor93
for the same reasons treatment for the plethora of "symptoms" resulting from said vaccines are covered and paid for by those same people who refused the vaccines.
Originally posted by pteridine
reply to post by thebtheb
Why should health insurance cover the cost of treatment for a disease incurred after the vaccine for that disease was refused? Have you factored that into your decision?
have you factored into your dissertation that without the vaccine "symptomology", health care costs might plummet ??
Originally posted by pteridine
Originally posted by Honor93
for the same reasons treatment for the plethora of "symptoms" resulting from said vaccines are covered and paid for by those same people who refused the vaccines.
Originally posted by pteridine
reply to post by thebtheb
Why should health insurance cover the cost of treatment for a disease incurred after the vaccine for that disease was refused? Have you factored that into your decision?
have you factored into your dissertation that without the vaccine "symptomology", health care costs might plummet ??
Why would healthcare costs "plummet" without vaccines?
Originally posted by dollukka
reply to post by thebtheb
Why are you afraid of vaccine shedding if you are healthy ? Im sure you realize how stupid it is to compare your scare of vaccine shedding if you are healthy to those who has cancer and have been told not to be around just vaccinated people.
Can you provide real data that vaccine shedding is inteed endangering your health? Not the hear sayings. WHO did take caution few years ago against influenza vaccine shedding and it was not invasive vaccine the one which was in focus was intranasal influenza vaccine.
The most absurd thing is when these fears gets totally out of context, if you are healthy do not compare yourself to those who have underlying diseases and low immunity against viruses
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
I found out about Mercury in Vaccines when a doctor started shaking a multidose vial of vaccine before injecting it into my wife's shoulder a year ago . I was told of the Mercury in it then , with the explanation that you have to mix it because mercury is heavy and settles . So , if they neglect to shake it you will get a large dose of mercury and it is accumulative with all the other sources you have been exposed to . It would be easy to forget to shake it up when you get busy .
Mercury causes some major neurological disorders , and hormonal problems causing miscarriages from what I have read . There is no good Mercury to put into your body .
Originally posted by pryingopen3rdeye
reply to post by Ex_CT2
it is YOUR OWN right to decide what is injected into your body, for people to criticize that decision is not PRO rights,
those who support forced vaccinations would certainly get some perspective if and when someone wants to forcibly inject them with something they dont want, hence the point of such rights