It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Try again.
Customer lists have no bearing at all on WHETHER they are doing business - it only bears on who they do business WITH.
What then of cash and carry, where no name is ever known to begin with? Can such a business claim NOT to be doing business for profit simply by not having a customer list?
Originally posted by Shadowalker
reply to post by nightbringr
Oh they supply it to the IRS. every year.
Originally posted by Shadowalker
But your still not gonna tell me fertilizer is the same as beans. What is someone gonna do? eat the whole bag and fart the air bad?
Originally posted by Shadowalker
You sir are wrong. Asinine examples that have not even one reference point to the issue are not going to cut it.
Originally posted by Shadowalker
The govt has no right to know who buys food or any quantity they may purchase. Being a lazy worthless piece of crap agent with the head in the rectum ........gives no right.
An agent needs to get off their dead ass and do solid investigating and police work. Not make a pool of everyone, and call them terrorists, when they are normal citizens and then decide which ones to pull out and call terrorists. Not based on the fact they eat and poop.
Originally posted by Shadowalker
Regardless There is a document ( a 2000 year old book if you like) that bears a history that all followers have a re-occuring 7 year time frame they should prepare for.
Originally posted by romanmel
reply to post by nightbringr
I was a Business Administrator for a large local church for seven years.
We NEVER submitted anything to any government authority regarding income.
We were fully exempt from property taxes on all property, income taxes , state local and sales taxes..
We did not have to deduct any taxes on wages for ministers, ever.
No agency ever attempted to contact us for anything during my tenure.
All because the 1st amendment to the US Constitution's "free exercise clause" specific to religion.
Originally posted by nightbringr
The point im making is yes, the government has every right to ask for chruches paperwork and accounting finances. If you insist they do not have to, please show me some proof. Any proof. Oh, but you cant, can you?
Originally posted by nightbringr
Originally posted by nenothtu
It must be my eyes. From over here, it looks like if they DON'T incorporate, then they are exempted, and outside the jurisdiction of the State, and that WAS State - Florida, it says.
No idea why you are reading it that way. Let me repost the line in question.
When the members of the church decided to incorporate their body under the laws of the state of Florida they submitted themselves to the jurisdiction of the state courts in all matters of a corporate nature, such as accounting for funds
So, this states that once they decided to incorporate, they are subjected to the same laws as any other corporation. So obviously this would include the right for the IRS or any other board with jurisdiction to ask for paperwork.
Originally posted by nenothtu
What does Federal law say - other than the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights, I mean. We already know what that says about government interference in church matters, and we already know that the Feds tend to not much care what the Constitution says, anyhow.
So what does Federal law say about it?
Good question. Looking into it now. Reguardless, if it turns out that organized religion is exempt from any type of oversight from federal bodies, i will be outraged.
Originally posted by nightbringr
Originally posted by romanmel
reply to post by nightbringr
I was a Business Administrator for a large local church for seven years.
We NEVER submitted anything to any government authority regarding income.
We were fully exempt from property taxes on all property, income taxes , state local and sales taxes..
We did not have to deduct any taxes on wages for ministers, ever.
No agency ever attempted to contact us for anything during my tenure.
All because the 1st amendment to the US Constitution's "free exercise clause" specific to religion.
All fair.
I still think religion should be held to the same standards any other business is. I dont think that is unreasonable.
Originally posted by zeeon
Sure they do. Especially if the Cannery isn't accounting for their income to say - the IRS. They may be tax exempt but they are still required to report sources of income. Imagine if they didn't have to account for sources of income - think about how such an organization could be used for illegal activities? If the cannery wasn't reporting income or other details required by federal law, then certainly that would invite a visit from "Federal Agents" wouldn't you agree?
And also I don't appreciate being labeled. I simply stated that if you need a list of Federal Agencies that have employees that could serve as "Federal Agents" I could do so. Google is your friend.
Originally posted by SumerianSoldier
Ok, so we got "Feds" checking a food cannery in Tennessee and we recently had articles on TSA conducting highway checks in same said state. Anyone have any idea why Tenneessee would be a state of some importance to target?
Tennessee is home of "The Farm" which is the oldest Self Organizing Intentional Community in the United States, excepting the collective farming communities in the midwest. It is the stronghold of the 60s "Hippie Movement" remnant and represents a working model of what is possible off grid and outside the system.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Your argument is that the have to incorporate in order to be subjected to corporate law, but the legal text says that IF they incorporate, then they are subject to corporate law - meaning if they DON'T incorporate, they are not. Corporations, especially those who sell foodstuffs, either for profit or not, are not required to keep customer lists. When was the last time you had to give your name at the grocery store before making a cash purchase?
Originally posted by nenothtu
Join the club. many people find different things to be outraged about every day.
I'm kind outraged that the federales have a dangerous habit of stepping outside their remit, but my outrage seems not to bother them all that much - they do it anyway.
It is the stronghold of the 60s "Hippie Movement" remnant and represents a working model of what is possible off grid and outside the system.
Originally posted by nenothtu
And also I don't appreciate being labeled. I simply stated that if you need a list of Federal Agencies that have employees that could serve as "Federal Agents" I could do so. Google is your friend.
No problem. Don't make the claim that you can provide a detailed list of Federal Agents and their Agencies, then.
Most Federal Agents would probably get a little sore about being outed like that.
Originally posted by gladtobehere
People still dont understand why some of us oppose BIG government.
Washington D.C. is not set up to "help you".
D.C. is a cesspool of corruption and waste. Its run by corporations, lobbyists, special interest groups and political insiders.
All of these unnecessary functions should be abolished and if need be, should be handled on the state and local levels, where there is a LOT more accountability. Its easier to demand change on a local level as opposed to a federal level.