It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
reply to post by hooper
I'm working from home today. The wife's gone to a blood sacrifice at the Church of Numerology so I'm looking after little Succubus and Beelzebub and typing "debunks" in between.
Originally posted by Mcupobob
reply to post by Six6Six
I'm thinking of writing a book now.
My life as a 9/11 disinfo agent. They pay totally sucks right now, you know how government jobs are right?
Oh wait that would blow out the whole conspiracy, and I would rake millions form my book deal, maybe I'll even get a movie!
I wonder why my other "Disinfo" agents haven't thought of it first? Oh thats right, because we don't exist, it would be stupid to hire a bunch of people and bring them in on the Conspiracy to hassle people on Internet forums.
Originally posted by BlackPoison94
Jeez..if they point fingers to you, believing you're a disinfo agent...there's only one truth...and this is...
...they don't agree with your opinion.
Governments, organizations and companies are always engaged in spin....
Originally posted by RisenAngel77
Originally posted by BlackPoison94
Jeez..if they point fingers to you, believing you're a disinfo agent...there's only one truth...and this is...
...they don't agree with your opinion.
That is not entirely true. The problem with people who we call disinfo agents is that they have yet to provide a valid arguement that dismisses evidence. Most people just come in a thread and say "You are wrong, this is debunked many times .... dot dot dot" so where is the rest of the info that supposedly debunked the evidence?
I have an open mind and God knows I wanted to be wrong about the Gov attacking it's own people. But after seeing soo many articles and soo many evidence and after piecing pieces of the puzzle together. It is hard to dismiss it with just a small argument.
Imo, if you want to debunk bring solid evidence. But not evidence we have looked over a thousand times over and dismissed it as a lie.
Originally posted by maryhinge
reply to post by Skyfloating
should ats have a list of disinfoers at hand
so we can ignore their mad ramblers/trollers
Originally posted by dillweed
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Two 110 story and one 47 story building, and you post this picture and expect us to think that's evidence that you have some credibility? Child, please. You haven't said anything new in years, just the same old tired song. Do us all a favor and take a break until you come up with something new. We know you think the planes brought the buildings down, please don't make us go thru this again. You point's well taken, and if you're right then this shouldn't be any skin off your nose. I'm trying to build a coalition of like minded people who want to see a new investigation into 9/11, and you are in my way. When you have some new evidence, by all means bring it up. But in the meantime do us all a favor, and stop regurgitating old news, it's very tiresome.
Originally posted by dillweed
[
. I'm trying to build a coalition of like minded people who want to see a new investigation into 9/11, and you are in my way.
None of that really answers why anyone would bother to target ATS specifically with disinfo. Can you tell me what would happen here if there were no disinfo agents? No debunkers? Explain what would happen that TPTB would not like.Text