It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by septic
It would be a game-changer. The Media are knee-deep in the coverup, so are NATO governments and academia. If the truth gets out, everything really does change after 911.
Originally posted by samkent
Without debunkers they have very few postings.
.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Originally posted by septic
It would be a game-changer. The Media are knee-deep in the coverup, so are NATO governments and academia. If the truth gets out, everything really does change after 911.
You mean that if the debunkers disappeared from this site the truth would immediately "get out"? I can't for the life of me believe that you can think that.
For a start there are several forums which have banned debunkers. And yet the "truth" remains stubbornly non-mainstream.
Originally posted by waypastvne
I love a good Truther fight. Balsamo and Turbofan, my favourite ever.
Originally posted by septic
I misunderstood your question; I was referring to the truth getting out, whether or not that would happen without the debunkers remains to be seen, but IMO they're one of the reasons the Internet is here...to lead people to the State's message.
TV, radio and print are all one-way conversations; making those media ideal for propagandists. The internet is different; the victims of aggressive war now have a voice, as do the slave classes. It would be devastating to the message if the Internet wasn't crawling with not just disinfo agents, but whole sites set up and maintained by them.
This is why users who speak out of turn are banned, and sites that don't agree with the message are labeled "disinfo sites", and why threads that do expose the truth are lumped into the HOAX bin.
Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer
Originally posted by waypastvne
I love a good Truther fight. Balsamo and Turbofan, my favourite ever.
got a link to that one?
What do you mean "remains to be seen"? There are sites without debunkers, where they are banned. The truth remains unloved by the world at large.
Why would an organisation that conducted 9/11 risk the conspiracy by employing shills, especially when the evidence suggests they are useless?
Originally posted by septic
This site works very hard to limit the conversation and ban debunkers.
When the questions are loaded with "especially when the evidence suggests they are useless", I realize you are not being genuine.
Why would fake sites set up fake conversations asking loaded questions?
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer
Originally posted by waypastvne
I love a good Truther fight. Balsamo and Turbofan, my favourite ever.
got a link to that one?
Yes I missed that one. Balsamo is my all-time favourite, next to maybe Phil Jayhan.
Originally posted by piles
reply to post by waypastvne
paid dis-info agents?
No, it categorically doesn't. I've never seen anybody banned from here for holding a particular viewpoint.
Originally posted by septic
i have; which makes you categorically incorrect.
I have been warned to not post certain subjects or I will be banned, and I witnessed it occur to a couple users. I was also told I wouldn't be allowed to even debate some topics.