Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Threads that don't feature debunkers dry up. Forums without them die.
You are asking me to believe that the perpetrators pay to keep the debate going. And that you waste your time talking to people who you know are paid to waste your time.
Why not just stop talking to them if you think they are nefarious and dishonest? No one forces you to participate. But I have a sneaking suspicion that you prefer arguing with debunkers than actually doing something concrete.
No not at all, take a look at cluesforum for example, it's free from debunkers and it's still alive. All the 9/11 researchers would be happy to carry on sharing info together with or without debunkers.
It's better for them to have debunkers, to divide people, to get them to disagree, to spread disinfo, to create confusion. It's an old tactic, so keeping it alive is a great damage limitation tactic because they know they made such a mess of the OS that it's just not going to go away now, so they may as well send the damage limitation boys in to muddy the water. Although, they need to pick better calibre candidates that can at least fool the 9/11 researchers. The current lot they employ are doing more damage to the OS.


