It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
More at Link...
Winter of 1779-80 In New Jersey
www.revolutionarywararchives.org...
After his successful operations in 1776-1777 and the defeat of the British at Trenton and Princeton, General George Washington chose Morristown, New Jersey for his winter encampment. For strategic reasons it was ideal. He was 31 miles from New York City, hence would have adequate time to defend against a British move against either the Hudson Highlands, or against Philadelphia. At the same time he was protected from an attack by the Watchung Mountains and swamplands to the east, and the Ramapo Hills which ran north to join the Hudson Highlands. During.the Revolutionary War period there were very few roads and the countryside was densely wooded, making the few existing passes very defensible.
The Winter of 1777-1778 was spent at Valley Forge after a successful British invasion from New York.
After the defeat at Saratoga and the promise of French intervention, the British decided they could not defend both New York City and recently captured Philadelphia. They evacuated Philadelphia, were intercepted at Monmouth Court House where they suffered heavy losses. Monmouth ended that year's major operations for both the Americans and British.
Originally posted by Anonymous Avatar
Actually since the Federal Reserve came into being the Dollar has lost 96 percent of it's value. I am not sure how you consider that type of inflation "cheap." Maybe you don't grasp basic economic concepts which I would be happy to explain to you if you would like. It's very simple, if inflation just merely doubles due to Bailouts and the Fed, then the job where you make 70k a year means you have the buying power of only a 35k a year job a year ago. I hope that is not too advanced for you to understand.
Originally posted by Anonymous Avatar
Founding Fathers aside, the tens of thousands of men who actually did the fighting for the founding of our country did so in the name of freedom. Freedom from a centralized and oppressive government that was the British Empire at the time. The lifestyle you are describing is exactly what they fought and exactly what those in this thread are discussing defending. So if you are going to sit and preach about how great it is why would you possibly put those down willing to defend it???
Originally posted by Anonymous Avatar
So while I am being a 'retard' could you please explain to all of us what the hell you are arguing for and arguing about? The lifestyle you just described to me is exactly what is being destroyed by our Government.
Please rock this boat some more because it really needs it.
I'm not saying everything is perfect, but you guys are going overboard on your theories... there have been bad people in our government and it has done bad things, but you would have this with ANY gov't with no recourse in most.
Originally posted by libertytoall
Part of your problem is you don't understand that modern revolution has a new title description. A revolutionary fighter is a terrorist.
Originally posted by debunky
Alexander the great: Perfected phalanx tactics vs. persian cavallery. The fact that a long pointy stick in a hedge formation is very effective against an enemy on a horse was rediscovered in the 15th century when cheap pikeniere made the higly trained and expensive knights obsolete.
The "rag tag force" employed guerillia tactics vs an enemy who played a lot "by the book", the then current book that is, wich said, stand on a field, shoot at each other until one side says "Ok, you won"
While guerillia tactics are very effective to this day they require a "hinterland" to withdraw too.
So unfortunately your examples for "numbers don't mean a thing" have nothing to do with numbers, but superiour tactics or technology respectively.
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
See that's what doesn't make any sense to me. We are ALREADY slaves to the few. Reducing the population just reduces the amount of consumers, which would be anti-thetical to the financial slave ship we have been on for years now.
The few love the status quo... they don't want radical change...
The tea party...
I admit though it was a great republican rally, and something the party needed to generate some unity. However, I look at it the same way that Bush/Cheney looks at any rally of anti-war protesters.... "yeah and?"
Originally posted by miragezero
Not surprisingly there has been a rise of crime. So who cleans up the mess for a *free* people? Government.
Centralized authority as we have is more efficient simply put.
I'm not saying everything is perfect, but you guys are going overboard on your theories... there have been bad people in our government and it has done bad things, but you would have this with ANY gov't with no recourse in most.
The whole 'NWO depopulation' scheme never made any sense to me. Fewer consumers to line their pockets + fewer slaves to make products to sell to consumers to line their pockets = a reduced standard of living for the 'upper echelon' in my mind. It's illogical and makes no sense to me.
Originally posted by cbianchi513
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
Yep... it's the effect of moving from a passive 2-d world to an interactive 3-d world.
AKA Mindfulness.
It does wonders for the mind.... Primarily it removes irrational fears as well...
Did you actually read and comprehend the intent of the post?
Of course not... In true progressive fashion,
you have twisted the meaning to suit your own agenda.
You've continued to troll and twist the words of patriots with your statist venom spouting cohorts.
I'd ignore you, but I find it is very useful to study my enemies carefully.
I'd "foe" you, but I lack the required respect for your opinion.
One thing I noticed about progressives... They are usually egotistical to a fault...
Not so smart after all, huh?
Snarky? Yes.
Smart? Not so much.
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
Let the flames begin... because I DID ignore you... lol
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
. . . You have single handedly proven that you don't have the ability to engage in any discussion with a level of maturity above throwing feces. . . .