Why do people still blame muslims for 911?

The fact that you think the "government" has anything to do with anything is one of the primary signs that 9/11 Truthers are out to lunch.

It is remarkable that Truthers fell so easily for the canard that the "government" was a "suspect" without ever being able to demonstrate it. Yet you believed your 9/11 Truther leaders hook, line and sinker without ever questionning them.

Probably because your believe what you are told by your 9/11 Truth Movement leaders.

I dont blame all Muslims for what a few Muslim extremist did on 911
Why do that? That's stupid.
I'm not going tto bother reading all the replies.

NO I'm not brainwashed. I dont believe everything I read online.
including ATS.

To help you understand, through reason and evidence, why you have no evidence that that "9/11 was an inside job."

You are in the minority because you have no proof that means anything to anybody but the immature that don't have developed reasoning ability, either due to their age or impairment.

This is self evident.

Start listing your proof of lies pertaining to 911 Cash.

thank you!

-CF

reply to post by CameronFox

---

Why? You, and I know all the “lies” don’t we lol
You just want to keep me busy, beside I have something better to do, I must bath my dog Dora she is getting a little stinky and we cant have that now can we.

Isn't it interesting how Truthers like cashlink who ignore inconvenient evidence for a living then go on to repeatedly demand proof for things they deliberately ignore the evidence for?

I note with interest that cashlink still can't prove he is who he says he is. And you'd think he jump at the chance to make a cool $100,000 to prove the moon exists:



Well, we all can play cashlink's game. Cashlink is unable to prove the Moon exists or that he is who he says he is. Give it a try, cashlink, and see how far you get.

Then you will understand the nature of your demands.

It's easier for the majority of people to believe the official story then it is to even imagine that the government of the US allowed the attacks to happen just as it's a lot safer to imagine that some passengers aboard a hijacked jet overpowered the terrorists and caused the flight to plunge into the ground some where in Pennsylvania when it's clear that they were actually shot down.

reply to post by jthomas

---

you're not making any sense jthomas. What on earth does the moon or who cashlink is have to do with 9-11???

reply to post by JPhish

---

Nothing! Jthomas, is having one of his tantrums, because the truth movement will not yield to him. I was hoping he would have some proof that Muslim committed the highjackings. (I guess not!)




[edit on 1/6/2009 by cashlink]

Hang on so if it wasn't the Muslims then who? - Zionists? LOL. That whole Zionist conspiracy is BS. Just think of every single Muslim who’s ever been caught attempting to blow something up as well as the ones who didn’t get stopped and killed innocent people in the process, are you Zionist conspiracy buffs telling me of all the terrorist attacks it just happened not to be Muslims on 9/11 but every other terrorist attack was? – IS THAT WHAT YOU’RE TELLING ME?

It should be clear. I'm applying the same standard of "proof" that cashlink demands of everyone else to illustrate the absurdity of HIS standard.

This is a standard critical thinking illustration to show how many will, like cashlink, avoid evidence and supporting their claims. See a good and straightforward illustration of this at www.revisionism.nl...

No intelligent conversation can take place here without participants adhering to the same rational standards. As you can see, cashlink will not do so and doesn't like being challenged. This is a common characteristic of 9/11 Truth Movement members and its Achilles heel.

It's always nice of you to illustrate that you cannot refute any of the massive evidence of 9/11.

I'll give you another chance. Start refuting all of this with evidence, cashlink:

wtc7lies.googlepages.com...

And leave out the ad hominems this time so you don't get reported again.

I may explain this badly, I'll give it shot however.

I have answered a few 9-11 threads here. Mostly because I was there and try (for some dumb reason) to provide my accounts of that day. The last post I made was someone saying Building 7 was demolished with explosives or something. Like I said, I got there at Church street when the South tower went down. We went in and retreated a few times, including the order to pull back when Bldg 7 looked like it was going to go. It did around 5 pm or so.

Things did happen pretty much as was released to the public in investigations. Many died, including the "Muslim terrorists" that hijacked the planes.
However . . . history tends to repeat itself.
What do you mean NYCMedic?
Well . . . I'll tell ya.

We knew full well Japan was going to hit us back in the 40's.
An Officer by the name of Mitchell even stated as such at his trial many years earlier. We were in a great economic depression at that time as well. Information was coming in about Japan and an impending attack.
Japan hit us and the rest you know.

Yes, the buildings fell because planes hit them, not cruise missles.
Yes, the Pentigon was hit by a plane, not a wayward government UFO.
Yes, the Muslim terrorists that were on the planes are dust.

But I feel somebody knew this was going to go down, and sat back a made it happen. 9-11 was an act of terror by Muslim radicals. But I find it hard to believe not one person in our government had a clue.
We did not know! That I just will never believe.

To be 100% on topic, please read this.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

To the OP;
"Why do people still believe Muslim (Terrorists) were responsible?"

Because overwhelming evidence points to that being the truth

I haven't been on here for a couple of years.
Last time there was lots of talk of "holographic jets" and "cruise missiles".

It's good to see rational and logical thought is finally making some headway.

Although after seven years "investigation for Truth" I was really hoping for some better evidence than the "squib" argument or the "the hijackers are alive and well and living with Elvis" argument.

I will continue to look for evidence of nefarious deeds by the US government. But you know how the saying goes: "If it looks like a duck and sounds like a duck, it's probably a duck."

I find two problems with the initial post:

1. There is no differentiation made between "Muslim'' and ''terrorist.''

2. Most of those original reports were later proven false; note that all the major news sources reported it right after 9/11, but not after.