Why do people still blame muslims for 911?, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 3-1-2009 @ 06:01 PM by jthomas
Originally posted by cashlink
Muslims Did Not Do 911 Proof Part 4. Is This A BBC Undercover Mosad Agent Lying


www.youtube.com...

This is more proof of Muslims not guilty.


You have no proof. You have an uninformed opinion.

Seven years after 9/11, nothing has refuted all the massive evidence from thousands of independent sources that bin Laden was behind and caused the 9/11 attacks.

You have your work cut out for you if you intend to support your opinion.


reply posted on 3-1-2009 @ 10:39 PM by cashlink
reply to post by jthomas



Seven years after 9/11, nothing has refuted all the massive evidence from thousands of independent sources that bin Laden was behind and caused the 9/11 attacks.


Wow! Beside spouting off your ridiculous opinions, why don’t “you” elaborate, where all these thousands of independent web site are that proves with sciences that your Bin Laden was behind 911?
I am looking for the truth .. how about “you”. Beside the lying Government what real proof can you give to support your rants



. You have your work cut out for you if you intend to support your opinion.



Looks like you have your cut out as well!





[edit on 1/3/2009 by cashlink]


reply posted on 3-1-2009 @ 10:52 PM by cashlink
reply to post by Seymour Butz


I doubt this will mean a thing to you, however, since it seems that the only function of ATS is for CTerz to get together and indulge each other's CT fantasies.


This is the kind of response I would expect from an angry denier! Do you “ever” have anything to contribute to this thread but your meaningless rants? Making fun of people by insulting them constantly, is really going to get you far.


reply posted on 4-1-2009 @ 01:01 AM by cashlink
reply to post by Dusty Pouch


Denial is easy and so is looking for alternate people to blame who we might have a personal beef with. It sometimes can be harder to just accept the truth for what it is.


What “truth” are you talking about, do you have proof that Muslim committed 911?
I do not what to hear, well the FBI, and the CIA, said! Because I know, they are already proven lairs. How do you know it is true? Because they say it is! So far most of the OS has been a proven lie, now some of you want to believe the Government version of the highjackings are true. (Ladies, and genital men, this, straight from the White House, President Bush, announces that extremists, Muslims did the highjackings, take our word for it! From CNN Sucker News.) Come on people, do you all believe in everything the Government tell you. If you answer no, then why would you believe the OS about the highjackings


reply posted on 4-1-2009 @ 04:02 AM by bovarcher
reply to post by dangleb3rry



You should address this question to tens of millions of Moslems around the world, who know (or believe they know) that the successful execution of the 'Planes Operation' as it was known during the planning phase in 1998-2000 was a great day for radical Islam in its struggle against 'Americn Imperialism' in the Middle East in the 1990s.

Unfortunately, most Americans who believe the delusional 'inside job' fantasy uncritically have no knowledge of the Arab world. Very few of them have lived and worked in Saudi Arabia (as I have) and very few speak Arabic or have any real understanding of radical Jihadist Wahabism, let alone experienced the persistent bombing and terror campaigns perpetrated by this movement throughout Saudi, Egypt, Jordan, Pakistan, Indonesia and other places in the Islamic world for the past 20 years.

Most people in the Islamic world who know (or believe they know) that this was a successful Jihadist operation are very familiar with all the delusional fantasies about controlled demolitions, pilotless remote-controlled planes, complicity of the Bush administration/CIA/NSA/FBI/MIA/other US Intels (take your pick). They read it all on the internet all the time, and they see it all on these forums and many others. They are not convinced, in my experience.

I visit Iran often, and have many Iranian friends and business partners. I have yet to find one single educated, well-informed Iranian, familiar with all the 'Truther' fantasies, who believes any of it. They know, or believe they know, that the 911 job was a regular Wahabist martyr operation - just one of many hundreds, but the only one to successfully strike directly at the US maninland, rather than just the US armed forces as do most of the IRD and suicide operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Personally I remain skeptical about all the 911 claims, not convinced either way. But it's the tens of millions of moslems around the world who believe that 911 was an Islamist operation you have to convince. So far, after 7 years, they are not persuaded otherwise.



reply posted on 4-1-2009 @ 02:52 PM by dalan.
Originally posted by Dusty Pouch
Look, I have seen the film which shows the same Muslim guys in the same motel, boarding the same plane that either a) smashed into the WTC or b) into the Pentagon or c) into a field.

-Either way all these people/terrorists invloved in 9/11 have been traced back to their own specific identities, their own activist associations in Islam and their own country of origin.


Yeah, that is a pretty funny coincidence.

Every plane carries the infamous balck boxes that record everything.

The black boxes are made out of the strongest alloy that we have available.

The blackboxes were destroyed by the "intense heat" of the fires from the planes hitting the towers.

But one of the hijackers was identifyed because His passport miraculously escaped the hijackers pocket, made it safely out of the explosion, and then landed in a convieniant spot for the FBI to find it.

Sure....

You'll have to come up with a "mountain" of evidence that could possibly contradict these facts and in truth I'm doing you the favor of tolerance to your views because you've posted on this site.


We do not need your "permission" nor your "tolerance" to look at the "mountain" of "evidence" that was OK'ed by the US government.

Our government can't even provide a "mountain" of evidence....

Let me see, the Pentagon was suppose to have been hit by a plane.

There was a Hotel across the street that the FBI reports caught the whole incident of the plane smashing into the pentagon on tape.

Real science proves that the Pentagon was hit with an air-to-ground missile.

The FBI refuses to release the tape, which could put these silly conspiracy theories to rest.

I wonder why.

Because there is no plane flying into the Pentagon.

In general any seriously delusional 9/11 deniers are a setback to our united front against terrorism as a nation.- Why would we kill our own on such a massive public scale and then think that the conspiracy would not be uncovered by the most junior of NY's homicide detectives.


It hasn't been.

And the attack was the perfect excuse for control and to create a police state in America.

"He who would trade essential liberty for temporary safety, deserves neither liberty nor safety"
-Benjamin Franklin

But, alas, that is exactly what we have done, we have traded essential liberties out of our Constitution so the government can protect us.

Disgusting.

If the Muslims hate us because we are a "free" people. Why would we be so submissive and give up our freedoms?

Fear mongering.

Accept it and for what it is worth help to counter further attacks


You want to stop America from being attacked? Then fire everyone in Washington and start over.

Because like it or not, America is going to be attacked again, but it won't be "Muslim extremists" or "Islamic Radicals" who are the culprit.

It will be compartments of the US government.

A US city is going to be hit with a nuke, I would guess Miami, but who knows.

Oddly enough, there was a nuclear warhead that actually went missing.

[edit on 1/4/2009 by dalan.]

[edit on 1/4/2009 by dalan.]



reply posted on 4-1-2009 @ 03:17 PM by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by NuclearPaul





That's not the same BBC that reported the collapse of WTC7 a little early, is it?


And your point is??? That on a chaotic news day someone heard them talking about WTC7 and how the FDNY was positive it was going to collapse, and instead they heard that it HAD collapsed??

Good grief, havent any truthers ever played the telephone game? It happens in almost EVERY major news event....James Brady was reported dead after Reagan got shot...oops didnt happen. CNN almost reported President G.H.W. Bush dead after he threw up on the Japanese Prime Minister...oops that didnt happen either. In the rush to "scoop" the competition, the media makes mistakes...always has, always will.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 15 hours ago, 112 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 11 hours ago, 96 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 9 hours ago, 62 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 6 hours ago, 58 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 13 hours ago, 50 replies