Rendlesham Forest 1980 Pt II - Will There Be An Answer?

originally posted by: Baablacksheep


By the way CB as am sure you will have noted. There has been a change of plan and seemingly John wont be involved in CapelGreen. His advisor came by in the "nick" of time😉.

Who is Big John's "advisor"? If he/she advised him to 'ride off into the sunset', they may as well give up!

originally posted by: wobbs62
the major coup for me would be Robert ball, not just because he was with halt on night 3 but apart from tamplin the only person that could tell us what really happened on night 2. a reply to: ConfusedBrit

Ball has given a brief interview and is the only other witness, aside from Halt, to publicly state that what he saw on Night Three was likely ET-related. Being in charge of Lt Bonnie Tamplin on Night Two is also significant; he could confirm exactly what happened since all we have are third-hand accounts.

a reply to: mirageman

I love the fact that people are listening to a couple of sex workers from Hertfordshire on the ins and outs of the R.F.I bless

All time low don't cha know

a reply to: ctj83

My first thoughts on the Rendelsham affair was they used the radar like a scalar weapon to knock out or move something out of orbit the resulting spike in electromagnetic radiation caused the light show.

My 2nd thought was the Russians at the time were tinkering with ICBM warheads, they wanted a warhead that could land next to Its target
They also fitted some of these warheads with Electro magnetic pulse weaponry

a reply to: MichaelNoir

there is a way to make a EMP blast with normal explosives but as im sure you know the VAST part of the EM band is not visible to human eyesight.

and there are 2 major issues with your ussr EMP warhead idea

1. ANY launch would be an act of war and would have been world wide news when the entire base saw a large explosion and subsequent EMP effects.

2. WHATEVER was in the woods and air were intelligently controlled so that rules out random balls of light caused by a massive EM discharge.


If anything it was a US/UK test that went poorly or was a friendly aircraft in trouble and landed out of sight of the base, don't forget there were already officers in the woods waiting for whatever to come down and the fact no one was armed tells me it wasn't russian.

Even at the time of the RFI the Apollo mission was almost 30 years old, do you think technology stands still?

the RFI craft bares a striking resemblance to the crash landrum sightings, smaller but VERY VERY similar.


if anything was taken out that night it was the cosmos sat but that still doesnt explain multi night events like we see. If we managed to bring down a sat with STARFIRE type tech then it would more than likely splash down in the water and not zig zag in the forest.

if you take away all the sensational;isim away from the story(like the binary stuff and what not) we have something that was under intelligent control that was able to get onto a US nuclear armed base and even check out the WSA without being fired upon, to me that makes the ufo a friendly.

i am only lightly acquainted with the security nuclear weapons and their components get and i can promise you that if the men that night even thought by 1% it was some Russian device all hell would have broken loose and it didn't.

the3 following day the owners(US contractors) came and got it. if i had to guess what it was i would say it was either a very advanced aircraft that was able to get to LEO and might have had a payload(power source) that was nuclear and when it was doing its mission ran into an issue and diverted to a nuclear US base to be recovered safely.

or

it was an early satellite inspector with some impressive propulsion systems on it and after getting what it went up for ;landed at a us base to have its cargo and self picked up later.

the problem was people didn't follow orders and went out looking for it when they were told to hold their positions and got a look at a really black program, and that's why we have the RFI

originally posted by: MichaelNoir
a reply to: mirageman

I love the fact that people are listening to a couple of sex workers from Hertfordshire on the ins and outs of the R.F.I bless

All time low don't cha know

Surreal indeed.

I wonder if Chuck Halt stood in that field at 3am in 1980 thinking, "The only way to solve this mystery will be to pose naked in a bathtub 40 years from now..."

Thankfully, Chuck has resisted such a temptation!


And hello, Michael, by the way - hope you enjoy your stay at ATS.

a reply to: ConfusedBrit

I put my sunglasses on CB after reading your comment about Halt.

originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: coursecatalog

Dont get me started CC. A very hefty background with porn re this lady.

And she is in the docu??

Oh boy.

You can't call what she does porn

Incest is vile bestiality is vile

One sick puppy that one

a reply to: MichaelNoir

The RFI situation is presently not in a good place with all the controversy MN.

Most members here are aware of this as you will have noted. Not a good subject at all😐.

Apart from all that. We now have John Burroughs about to cook up another storm?

originally posted by: ConfusedBrit

originally posted by: MichaelNoir
a reply to: mirageman

I love the fact that people are listening to a couple of sex workers from Hertfordshire on the ins and outs of the R.F.I bless

All time low don't cha know

Surreal indeed.

I wonder if Chuck Halt stood in that field at 3am in 1980 thinking, "The only way to solve this mystery will be to pose naked in a bathtub 40 years from now..."

Thankfully, Chuck has resisted such a temptation!


And hello, Michael, by the way - hope you enjoy your stay at ATS.

I like many of you have watched this circus for a lot of years and it gets crazier and crazier as time has gone on magic binary codes popping up years later
Unreliable witnesses who have mashed together stolen accounts of real witnesses, because they thought it would bring them fame and fortune.
The showbiz lifestyle didn't quite work out as planned I suspect, why else would you need to sell counterfeit rock memorabilia.

Why aren't questions been asked regarding the scratched black photo with the lights on ? the photo warren punts about claiming special forces gave him it , it's bull# like this and tons of other discrepancies that have killed his story dead for me

Too many lies have come back to bite him on the arse.

The only way the R.F.I will be solved is when the military owns up to what they did to their own troops and until that day comes you can talk time travelling aliens from magical Hy Brasil until the cows come home

Me personally I'm just going to sit here with my big bag of Doritos and watch the # show to come.

originally posted by: MichaelNoir
The only way the R.F.I will be solved is when the military owns up to what they did to their own troops and until that day comes you can talk time travelling aliens from magical Hy Brasil until the cows come home

Me personally I'm just going to sit here with my big bag of Doritos and watch the # show to come.

After everything discussed in two long threads over six years, thousands of posts and hundreds of theories... after all the noise, three factual elements sum up the case for me:

1) USAF personnel wandered through a particular area of forest they'd never visited before where the effects of the Orford Ness lighthouse through the trees could be truly startling for anyone not acquainted with it.

2) Halt went home at 3.30am whilst 'star'-like objects hung over the base and remained there until sunrise. Rather like stars, then.

3) In early January 1981, an excited and jolly Gordon Williams and Halt sped up to the forest in Chuck's sports car to try and witness further lights reported by Senior Airman Palmer and A1C La Plume - to no avail, leaving Halt looking rather sheepish and Williams deflated (as was his wife who had been equally excited). So much for a 'serious' incident occurring over Xmas.

Over the space of a year or so, I have journeyed from TruBeliever in the RFI... to Neutral Observer... to Deflated Sceptic.

But it has been quite a ride, entertainment-wise! Now all that remains for the RFI is a fascinating character study of peculiar human behaviour and beliefs. And porn stars in bath tubs.

originally posted by: penroc3
a reply to: MichaelNoir

there is a way to make a EMP blast with normal explosives but as im sure you know the VAST part of the EM band is not visible to human eyesight.

and there are 2 major issues with your ussr EMP warhead idea

1. ANY launch would be an act of war and would have been world wide news when the entire base saw a large explosion and subsequent EMP effects.

2. WHATEVER was in the woods and air were intelligently controlled so that rules out random balls of light caused by a massive EM discharge.


If anything it was a US/UK test that went poorly or was a friendly aircraft in trouble and landed out of sight of the base, don't forget there were already officers in the woods waiting for whatever to come down and the fact no one was armed tells me it wasn't russian.

I was thinking more on the lines of "loitering munitions" maybe they were testing the capabilities of a locust type system

books.google.co.uk... SIyoSLz6vftEgZ_q0g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjAle3L9ajlAhWyy4UKHarPCwE4ChDoATAAegQIBxAB#v=onepage&q=1980 Loitering munition warhead&f=false

originally posted by: ConfusedBrit

originally posted by: MichaelNoir
The only way the R.F.I will be solved is when the military owns up to what they did to their own troops and until that day comes you can talk time travelling aliens from magical Hy Brasil until the cows come home

Me personally I'm just going to sit here with my big bag of Doritos and watch the # show to come.

After everything discussed in two long threads over six years, thousands of posts and hundreds of theories... after all the noise, three factual elements sum up the case for me:

1) USAF personnel wandered through a particular area of forest they'd never visited before where the effects of the Orford Ness lighthouse through the trees could be truly startling for anyone not acquainted with it.

2) Halt went home at 3.30am whilst 'star'-like objects hung over the base and remained there until sunrise. Rather like stars, then.

3) In early January 1981, an excited and jolly Gordon Williams and Halt sped up to the forest in Chuck's sports car to try and witness further lights reported by Senior Airman Palmer and A1C La Plume - to no avail, leaving Halt looking rather sheepish and Williams deflated (as was his wife who had been equally excited). So much for a 'serious' incident occurring over Xmas.

Over the space of a year or so, I have journeyed from TruBeliever in the RFI... to Neutral Observer... to Deflated Sceptic.

But it has been quite a ride, entertainment-wise! Now all that remains for the RFI is a fascinating character study of peculiar human behaviour and beliefs. And porn stars in bath tubs.

I 100% agree all the hoopla and it will turn out to have been a top secret test of some new fangled
Defence bot and the service personell at bentwaters and Woodbridge the guinea pigs in the grand scheme of things

a reply to: MichaelNoir

#capelgreen raflmao

a reply to: MichaelNoir

If I was driving a trans-am I'd just ask kit2000 to be honest..

a reply to: pigsy2400

Whats a kit2000?

FYI:

New Rendlesham Doc.

Personally, my belief will always be that this was disinfo... why, during the same time frame there were many of us caught up in the active crash recovery protocol at a crash in Germany. This recovery, as are all are critical and ultra secret and it is my belief that this was all a bait and switch... but hey, who knows for sure.

All I know is all these yahoo's who say they were in aatip and this and that and on tv but don't reveal or acknowledge that we have had recovery teams and an active crash recovery protocol in place for over 60 years just let's you know they are all BS and disinfo...

There are hundred if not thousands of us military veteran's who were caught up in this protocol over the years.... you can release cockpit video but you don't know about crash recovery protocol lol... oh n by the way, you would not have seen that cockpit video unless they wanted you to... anyone who tries to tell you different is just a lie....

a reply to: celltypespecific

You are very brave Cellty, that and the binary are quite the mix.

a reply to: celltypespecific

Isn't this post a bit like bringing coals to Newcastle?

originally posted by: celltypespecific
New Rendlesham Doc.

Well the soundtrack is good. Lying Larry, ahgh. But I look forward to what Lori and Steve have to say. Not expecting much new, just some entertainment.