It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Rendlesham Forest 1980 Pt II - Will There Be An Answer?

page: 108
45
<< 105  106  107    109  110  111 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 09:59 AM
link   
a reply to: spiritualarchitect

I suspect others are not exactly wearing their honesty outfits either are they? Yep will be interesting to see what others have to say. When is it out have lost track?




posted on Oct, 26 2019 @ 11:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Baablacksheep





video is here on another thread but also has similarities to the RFI



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:27 PM
link   
Two videos about Halt's 2019 return to Rendlesham have finally been published - the first is a daytime ramble through the forest which is quite a relaxing watch. Nothing particularly new is established although Halt has clearly recanted his "ET" belief from 2009 (when he was best mates with Heseltine and embarking on a film project that never materialised unless we regard 'Capel Green' as an evolution of that original plan) and simply describes them as "intelligently controlled".



For the first time, though, at approx 22:00, he describes in detail what happened when Burroughs and Bustinza 'went forward' on Night Three.


He said, "I really wanna go back and look at the landing site again". So Bustinza went with him, and they were only 100-150 yards away; we could see them - they went up to the landing site, came back... I didn't see anything. I wasn't standing focused on them the whole time, but between the five if us we could see them.


So, according to Halt, sweet Fanny Adams happened to John that night - no running towards a light with Bustinza falling to the ground watching John being 'enveloped' by a light with 'shadowy figures' within, etc. Zip, rien, nada, nuthin'.

The second video is of the UFO lecture that took place, which I haven't got the willpower to sit through...




posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 11:32 PM
link   
a reply to: ConfusedBrit


So, according to Halt, sweet Fanny Adams happened to John that night - no running towards a light with Bustinza falling to the ground watching John being 'enveloped' by a light with 'shadowy figures' within, etc. Zip, rien, nada, nuthin


What so now what?



edit on 29-10-2019 by Baablacksheep because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 09:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: ConfusedBrit


So, according to Halt, sweet Fanny Adams happened to John that night - no running towards a light with Bustinza falling to the ground watching John being 'enveloped' by a light with 'shadowy figures' within, etc. Zip, rien, nada, nuthin


What so now what?


Good question. I wonder what Big John will make of Halt's comments. As Chuck said, other personnel were watching too, and they saw nothing unusual when he went forward with Bustinza - eg I'm sure Nevels would have mentioned it since he has been quite vocal recently.

As for Bustinza, if Halt is correct, then he lied through his teeth during that 2015 interview. But then, as I mentioned before, if Warren's recollection of Bustinza's wild UFO conspiracy theories is accurate, then Busty is compromised anyway.

I skimmed through the second video, and if the notion that Dr Kit Green visited Rendlesham in Dec 1980 is true, then I'm an alien monkey's Uncle from the planet Bollocks.


edit on 30-10-2019 by ConfusedBrit because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 31 2019 @ 10:11 AM
link   
a reply to: ConfusedBrit


I skimmed through the second video, and if the notion that Dr Kit Green visited Rendlesham in Dec 1980 is true, then I'm an alien monkey's Uncle from the planet Bollocks.


I have never seen an alien monkey from the planet Bollocks before
. Nothing would surprise me when it comes to Green CC.


@Penroc, I don't recon much to that video you posted.






edit on 31-10-2019 by Baablacksheep because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 31 2019 @ 10:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Baablacksheep

the video i posted is clearly some consumer drone with some lasers and lights attached.

but imagine something like that in the 80's at night in a dark forest, i think you wouldn't be blamed to think it was something ....other than normal.

i was using it as a way to illustrate what i think was at least part of the RFI(psy ops). when the RFI happened not allot of people knew drones even existed let alone something that is an advanced black project.

on a side note, how much do you think these guys get for appearances?



posted on Oct, 31 2019 @ 11:59 AM
link   
a reply to: penroc3

Hi Penroc. Ok I understand what you are suggesting.


on a side note, how much do you think these guys get for appearances?


I don't know the fee structure Penroc but I am going to assume that they will be well compensated at the larger gatherings. I suspect its a nice little income earner for some?




posted on Oct, 31 2019 @ 03:29 PM
link   
How many more times will chucky have to walk through the forest telling the same old story, (from a script especially written for him by one of the alphabet lot) exactly they same every time with the slag Larry Warren off bit and any other whiteness that tells a different story, and people pay to listen to this bollocks year in year out. a reply to: ConfusedBrit



posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 03:58 AM
link   
This is making the rounds.


youtu.be...


Also I have noticed Osborn has gone quiet. Perhaps completing book 2 ?.




posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 04:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Baablacksheep
This is making the rounds.

youtu.be...


Jim didn't look comfortable at all during that plea to buy his book; he almost seems constipated.

And I'm not sure he should have "guaranteed" that the reader will "not be disappointed" - that's a bold declaration.


Also I have noticed Osborn has gone quiet. Perhaps completing book 2 ?.


Will the publication of volumes 2 and 3 depend on the level of success of the first book (which seems even more unwieldy than the back-breaking 'The Halt Perspective' doorstop)?



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 03:08 AM
link   
a reply to: ConfusedBrit


And I'm not sure he should have "guaranteed" that the reader will "not be disappointed" - that's a bold declaration.


Does it comes with a money back guarantee ?




posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 03:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Baablacksheep

A splendid time is guaranteed for all.



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 01:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: penroc3

granted that was in the past few years but the platform i saw was no experimental aircraft, its fit and finish and flawless performance demands that it is not the first of its kind. It moved in sharp, punctuated and deliberate movements that only experience and mastery of said systems can get.

looking back on my experience and knowing what i know the strange hypnotizingly blue glow emanating from the corners should have sent me scrambling for a lead shield.

but i stopped my car in the middle of the road and started walking towards it, more out of disbelief and god knows what else.

the fact it could pin itself to one spot in the air and in the same breath move so fast and effortlessly without sound also points to the fact it is using something other than air to move and that leaves few things i would want to be as close as i was to it.

its a wonder more people don't get hurt by close encounters.

what ever is powering the thing from the RFI to the small black triangle i saw is without a doubt extremely power dense, past chemical power and that leaves only something like a nuclear reaction

the only thing about an unshielded reactor would be the the absolute death zone around such a thing and none of the men came away with nasty burns that night or later radiation sickness.


Nice information there.



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 07:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: penroc3

granted that was in the past few years but the platform i saw was no experimental aircraft, its fit and finish and flawless performance demands that it is not the first of its kind. It moved in sharp, punctuated and deliberate movements that only experience and mastery of said systems can get...

... what ever is powering the thing from the RFI to the small black triangle i saw is without a doubt extremely power dense, past chemical power and that leaves only something like a nuclear reaction


As you may already know, my better half (with a friend) saw a gigantic black triangle at very close range that was a genuinely frightening experience, causing them both to literally run away like rabbits. Like the RFI's alleged object on Night Three, it was also beaming lights down to the ground. As a result, she accepts it was probably Not Of This Earth, but usually doesn't ponder the point or even think it's of vital importance - which is bizarre to people like us!

I only mention it because today she was casually asking questions about UFO news and half-seriously wondering if she should undergo regression to 're-live' her encounter in more detail. I advised against it, but that's my own stance on such techniques. I very much doubt she WILL pursue it... but if she does, I'll report back!

(Aside from ghosts/poltergeists, I have personally seen diddly-squat that's UFO-related, so I'm a bit jealous of her incident, I suppose.)



posted on Nov, 24 2019 @ 01:50 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 04:14 PM
link   
The alleged concerns raised by MIB88 (some of his posts were removed) and subsequently by MichaelNoir (same guy, different accounts) need to be addressed.

Anicka has personally contributed hundreds of hours of research into the RFI topic, yielding genuine new insights -- some of which might be of some importance.

This female UFO researcher, who was mentioned in this thread after she interviewed RFI UFO witness Sgt Michael Stacy Smith, has been criticised here, and viciously attacked elsewhere, in posts by the same gentleman under various related usernames. I believe in equality, but I do think we have to be especially careful about personal attacks by men on female members of the UFOlogy community -- particularly when these attacks have a sexual dimension as in this case. I strongly condemn the debating strategies and logical fallacies being leveraged by a very small minority in the community, as represented by the recent posts by mib88/MichaelNoir.

This is an important point, not least because it harms the RFI topic, and is toxic to the community surrounding it, if we permit the discourse to be poisoned by irrelevant ad hominem attacks of this nature.

Let's focus on the research, and judge each contribution on its own merits -- avoiding personal attacks. In this way, we can avoid being drawn into the toxic politics that tends to plague the RFI.

To answer legitimate questions raised by other forum members, I can confirm that Anicka's work has nothing to do with the upcoming documentary, Capel Green, nor will her interviews or articles form any part of it, though she does maintain a working relationship with the director. As contemporaneous researchers, they do sometimes share information with each other.

I'll respond concisely to specific points inline below.


originally posted by: MichaelNoir
a reply to: mirageman

I love the fact that people are listening to a couple of sex workers from Hertfordshire on the ins and outs of the R.F.I bless

All time low don't cha know


I would argue that the UFO researchers referred to here are not "sex workers" but, more importantly, readers of this thread must ask the question: does the extracurricular activities of a UFO researcher have anything to do with this discussion?

I put it to the reader that what Anicka does in her spare time has no bearing whatsoever on the quality of content of her research, and bringing it up is a transparent smear campaign. This also forms part of wider attacks online which appear to be designed to deter her from contributing. Yes, it is as sinister as it sounds, and I can provide extensive examples rivately upon request.

Does anyone have any questions of concerns about the actual content of Anicka's RFI research?


originally posted by: MichaelNoir

originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: coursecatalog

Dont get me started CC. A very hefty background with porn re this lady.

And she is in the docu??

Oh boy.


You can't call what she does porn

Incest is vile bestiality is vile

One sick puppy that one



This is an unacceptable attack against a female UFO researcher.

I don't think a post like that should be allowed on a civilised forum such as this, but since it has been I am obliged to respond.

This is not the place to educate mib88/MichaelNoir on these topics, and it would require a level of sex-ed beyond what is received at school. For example, petplay is not "bestiality" by any stretch of the imagination; it is, by definition, a fetish roleplay between two consenting adults. Perhaps, mib88/MichaelNoir/MichaelIanBlack needs to broaden his horizons in the bedroom, this needed to be said given the seriousness of his allegations, but let's not get into that any further here. It's surprising how far some men will go to insult a woman when they feel they are hiding safely behind a keyboard and a fake name.


originally posted by: MichaelNoir
a reply to: MichaelNoir

#capelgreen raflmao


What is funny about the documentary? Let's discuss that. What are your actual concerns? I have contributed to the film in small ways myself and have some inside knowledge that perhaps could help to settle the matter. I am certainly better informed than MichaelNoir and many of his non-impartial associates at the vanguard of the anti-Larry campaign.
edit on 27-11-2019 by ScienceGeek because: grammar

edit on 27-11-2019 by ScienceGeek because: punctuation

edit on 27-11-2019 by ScienceGeek because: grammar



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 05:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: ScienceGeek
For example, petplay is not "bestiality" by any stretch of the imagination; it is, by definition, a fetish roleplay between two consenting adults. Perhaps, mib88/MichaelNoir/MichaelIanBlack needs to broaden his horizons in the bedroom.


Mr Noir seemed to have an unhealthy obsession!

From a calmer point of view, it must be said that any helpful work this lady has done for the RFI case is naturally suffering. How could it not? Rather than elaborating and educating people on the intricacies of the Joy Of Sex and all its permutations and kinky combinations, or presenting overviews of the RFI whilst naked in a bathtub, is it not possible to extricate the Sex from the Ufology?

Or maybe this is the future of Ufology - Bob Lazar in a thong... Luis Elizondo dressed as a dominatrix...


Moreover, this lady's activities and choices of presentation serve as both a spectacular distraction and a laughing stock in general for an already troubled case packed with in-fighting and bizarre embellishments.




edit on 27-11-2019 by ConfusedBrit because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 05:40 PM
link   
I can understand that point of view.

If the research is useful and withstands scrutiny, it stands. If not, it can be disregarded.

In this case, the research is useful, and credible, and ultimately that remains the case regardless of what folks might say about the chick who did the work.



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 06:04 PM
link   
Might I remind people that, part of the antipathy between Bohr and Einstein was because , Bohr was a party animal and then some. he did like a good orgy by all accounts. That's quite possibly part of the answer as to why Bohr could handle quantum theory and Einstein quit science because of it and became a celebrity instead.

Not forgetting Jack Parsons, who was "a bit of a genius" whilst enjoying finding himself at the top of a naked human pyramid and Tesla who was "incredibly successful with the ladies" for much of his life.




top topics



 
45
<< 105  106  107    109  110  111 >>

log in

join