It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Who do you believe in this case?
I'm expecting a pantomime for the 40th anniversary.
originally posted by: TotoMesch
I'll also pitch in with a little vignette.
Has anyone, to anybody's knowledge, gone down the Forestry Commission path? Seeing as they, the Forestry Commission, turned-up a matter of days later and cut-swath to the trees around the supposed landing area due to an aggressive tree disease. Allegedly.
It was noticed that buried beneath all the debris of leaves and branches were stumps of tree trunks. A closer look at these revealed that a saw had been the responsible instrument. The forest had obviously been developed to provide wood, and therefore the trees had been cultivated in a certain way. It seemed probable that trees that once stood in the area had been cut down and taken away. Furthermore, the dead branches which were scattered about had obviously been stripped off the main trunk and discarded as they were of little use.
It was obvious that this area and the previous one had been subjected to the same process - tree felling - and not due to the landing of some kind of craft... Dot was not very happy at SCUFORI's findings but agreed with them.