posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 05:58 AM
So is the administration preparing for war, making a final upgrade in the silence before the storm? Or do they expect 'the people' to take over the
white house, kind of "we don't want to shoot anybody when the time comes so let them have it and we'll stay in the bunker until everything has cooled
off".
Reading the article I was let down by the picture of Bush in the bunker. With so many designers in the US, so many beautiful houses, so many Hollywood
movies with futuristic control centres, howcome Bush and his adminstration is sitting there in a cramped dimmed room with what appears only the bare
necessities? It's almost symbolic. No one thought "Hey let's hire a professional designer instead of just putting a desk and some chairs in there?".
They could have at least installed artifical sunlights, painted the walls a lighter color, put up wide screen monitors feeding those who have to make
difficult choices nonstop information, use a round table with speech recognition software so spoken words are displayed on each individuals' monitor.
Ok so they got monitors but they're not even turned on. It just looks amateuristic, if Obama chose to upgrade the lot the money spend would be
justifiable.
edit on 19/10/2011 by Dragonfly79 because: (no reason given)