It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by indigothefish
would you say that there is released footage that exists, perhaps that you can show me, that clearly shows a plane about to hit, or video of it, hitting the pentagon?
Originally posted by OneNationUnder
No pilot can skillfully fly a plane going 500+mph only feet off the ground.
It was NOT a plane.
Originally posted by ShaunHatfield
reply to post by MrWendal
Mr. Wendel, do you have a short memory? It was you that got me riled up last time.. You have the same MO every time, not realizing your talking to the same person, due to the name change.
You did the exact same thing last time.. You asked innocent questions that had a hint of being leading, then you started to try and discredit my memory of the day... Your tactic is obvious and your openness to believe is a slivers width... You have your mind made up with little flash phrases and slivers of "theories", that when well placed, create the story YOU want to believe.
Previous names of mine Mobius - Resurectio - if that helps.edit on 6/21/2011 by ShaunHatfield because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by indigothefish
reply to post by GoodOlDave
i'm refering to nearby gas stations security cameras that were pointed close enough at the pentagon that they would have captured evidence that could have proved THIS THREAD correct or incorrect
footage from bystanders, civilians, with video cameras which were taken, again the footage contained could have been very useful to this thread as well as a nearby hotel security camera which, again could have been very helpful to this thread's discussion
all this footage taken by men in suits, taken by the government pushing 'the official story' but not to be released to help prove the official story
i'd like to state my opinion on the subject, rather than a missile or "no plane" i think a drone was used, one that looked similiar to a plane ( to the untrained eye ) along with possibly being painted to look like a boeing passenger plane
Originally posted by ShaunHatfield
reply to post by TheeTheChad
There is something honest about the movement... I often think "movement" when I think of the movement.
Originally posted by TheeTheChad
I just have a question, since I bring nothing new to the table of 9/11 discussion. (who has recently?)
To those trying to back up the official story, why? That's all. The Majority of people I talk to believe the official story, very few people I know question it. Why feel the need to try and change the opinions of a minority? on a conspiracy site no less.
I know I get involved in these conversations because I don't like seeing lies and fabrications past along as facts and proof. Does that answer your question?
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
reply to post by SkepticAndBeliever
Allot of posters feed the conspirator a bunch of bs to get stars and such, because they understand how a conspirators brain works, but me, I just try to give hard factual realistic evidence that they can learn from.
I hate tricking people or deceiving them just for a couple of stars, it is not good to do that, especially towards your fellow posters.
The truth is a airplane hit the pentagon and that’s just that.
Originally posted by ShaunHatfield
reply to post by Juanxlink
Are you implying that an engine would bury itself into a steel reinforced concrete floor while traveling at a 10 to 15 degree angle? Can you provide pictures of reference to these engines that "should have been burrowed into the ground" provide a previous situation (other than 93 that hit nearly straight down)
Lets do a little test .... go out into your sand box, take a battery and throw it at a 30 degree angle.. now throw it straight down, the differences should be obvious.. Now imagine steel reinforced 4000+ concrete flooring...
Mute point!!!