It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
I did not make the claim it is true. The author of the koran did and I believe him. If you want to believe it or not then go ahead and disprove it. I do not require proof of it being true, because I know it is.
You saying magic elephant does not make it true because your claims are not verified by credible scholars or historians who have verified the existence and works of muhammed.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Originally posted by Argyll
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Those are biased sources and not scholarly sources
Could you post one of your scholarly sources to back up your claims?........and no, I don't mean a lame wikipedia list of names.
Already gave you a list and one name on my previous post. None of them have dismissed the jinn chapter outright calling for its deletion in the koran.
Originally posted by notsoperfect
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
There were things that were normal back then, that are not normal now. Your great great great grandfather was probably a christian and probably a pedophile. It is not right to do those things now does not mean they were not true.
There are reasons for the teachings against incest in the bible. It demoralizes the family. It breaks down the basic fabric of the human units of life.
Mohammed didn't understand it, he never did. That's why he can become such an evil character to instigate violent killings against innocent people (to this day).
That's why his teachings are all wrong. That's why Koran is falsified as a fraudulant document.
Originally posted by Argyll
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Originally posted by Argyll
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Those are biased sources and not scholarly sources
Could you post one of your scholarly sources to back up your claims?........and no, I don't mean a lame wikipedia list of names.
Already gave you a list and one name on my previous post. None of them have dismissed the jinn chapter outright calling for its deletion in the koran.
NO......I don't want a list of names, show me where one of those people on your list states that what you are saying is true.....comprende?
Don't come back and say "well they haven't said it isn't true" come back and show me and every other member here where they said it is true!
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Originally posted by Argyll
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Argyll
I provided all the scholars and their are many many more. They have not dismissed the jinn chapter in the koran and they are a bigger expert than anyone of us here.
No one has disproven the koran chapter on the jinn using verifiable credible scholarly work
How do you know they haven't?....you just posted a link to a list of names, you don't know who any of those people are or what they have written do you?
Who says they are?
You do know wikipedia is a self editing and factually unreliable website don't you|?
If they dissmissed it we would have known about it. These are highly prominent well regarded scholars.
None of the scholars have disproved or said that the chapter in the koran is incorrect. That is why i posted this theory about the jinn because no one has dissmissed the source and it is a valid source that has not been dismissed by scholars. If they dissmissed it we would have known about it.
Originally posted by baddmove
maybe you guys should take this to u2u's now..getting kinda old the way you keep going back and forth over the same sentences..just saying..
good post OP..i was intrigued...
Originally posted by Area51NightStandx
I am stating that it is a fact the Quran is fiction. Disprove me please.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Argyll
It is not outlandish. If scientists studying teh atom discovered something unusual with the realm of matter don't you think it would spread like wildfire within the scientific community and the media?
Originally posted by Argyll
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Argyll
It is not outlandish. If scientists studying teh atom discovered something unusual with the realm of matter don't you think it would spread like wildfire within the scientific community and the media?
Now go back and answer the question I asked you.....don't try and compare science with religion, religion is faith based, science is fact based.
Nice try at avoiding the question......but you still lose.
Originally posted by lastrebel
Originally posted by skyjohn
The Christian bible makes several references to unicorns.
Does that make them real? No of course not.
Can you provide a verse or even a link for this.......I have read the Binle for 50+ years and havent ran accross that verse yet
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Religion is also fact based.