It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Yet I asked a question about WHEN this happened.
Just because you fail to understand what is written does not mean I don't know what it means.
originally posted by: SuperFrog
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
Everything that is appearing to exist presently is being created and destroyed right now. How can there be movement if everything stays the same?
There is something (which is not a thing) which never changes and that is 'that' which knows that the appearance is changing - it never 'appears' to exist but without it nothing could appear to exist.
I am sure that you did not lost just me in this word play, but yourself as well...
But I am sure you are not trying to explain how come we have evidence that 98% of life forms on earth are extinct... would that make our creator somewhat 'not knowing how to do it' kind of being/entity? (just noticing)
Like the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), the CνB is a relic of the big bang, and while the CMB dates from when the universe was 379,000 years old, the CνB decoupled from matter when the universe was 2 seconds old. It is estimated that today the CνB has a temperature of roughly 1.95 K. Since low-energy neutrinos interact only very weakly with matter, they are notoriously difficult to detect and the CνB might never be observed directly. There is, however, compelling indirect evidence for its existence.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
Just because you fail to understand what is written does not mean I don't know what it means.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
is constantly changing form -
so never truly forms
it is the formless.
If it is never formed
it cannot be a thing that has been created.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Yet I asked a question about WHEN this happened.
Nothing can happen outside of now - so it must have happened now!!!
All that appears disappears in presence.
The idea that there is another time can only happen presently.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Yet I asked a question about WHEN this happened.
Nothing can happen outside of now - so it must have happened now!!!
All that appears disappears in presence.
The idea that there is another time can only happen presently.
Prove that statement. Until you do, that is just philosophical mumbo-jumbo.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Yet I asked a question about WHEN this happened.
Nothing can happen outside of now - so it must have happened now!!!
All that appears disappears in presence.
The idea that there is another time can only happen presently.
Prove that statement. Until you do, that is just philosophical mumbo-jumbo.
I cannot prove it to you. But if you check for yourself you might notice that you have never actually seen or known any other time but now. You are always here and now and thoughts about time happen where and when you are.
Can you honestly ever say that you are not now?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Yet I asked a question about WHEN this happened.
Nothing can happen outside of now - so it must have happened now!!!
All that appears disappears in presence.
The idea that there is another time can only happen presently.
Prove that statement. Until you do, that is just philosophical mumbo-jumbo.
I cannot prove it to you. But if you check for yourself you might notice that you have never actually seen or known any other time but now. You are always here and now and thoughts about time happen where and when you are.
Can you honestly ever say that you are not now?
I can say that I experienced my lunch 30 minutes ago so no I'm going to say you are wrong. Thanks for trying though.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Can you ever separate yourself physically from now?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Itisnowagain
I observed myself directly eating the lunch. It happened.
The standard model used to dictate that the stars and planets and the sun revolved around the earth.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
For instance, if time didn't exist then the standard model of physics would be wrong and we base just about all of science off of the standard model of physics.
No one travels through time - change happens now. Now is always now but now always appears different.
Couple this idea with the fact that no two people in the world travel through time at the same rate and you have everyone sitting on different parts of the time axis on the 4D scale.
Is it not now right now? Is there anywhere on earth or in the entire universe where it is not now now?
Therefore no two people live in the same "now" like you just described. Therefore you are wrong. So you can use all the flowery imagery you want to try to say that time doesn't exist, science disagrees with you and frankly science is winning the argument since it is responsible for literally every part of your modern life. In fact, I'd argue that the "now" as you describe it doesn't exist and at the most it is just a relative term.