It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
... devalue women and brainwash them into being subservient to men ...
AfterInfinity
EnPassant
AfterInfinity
EnPassant
AfterInfinity
EnPassant
racasan
EnPassant
Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by EnPassant
You said a society without religion would fall apart. I showed societies that are primarily non-religous that are not only not falling apart but are doing better than societies that are primarily religious. You say that is "amateurish". Whatever logic helps you sleep at night.
But there is more to it than this. The moral fibre of the world depends on the spiritual substance of the world. If mankind loses its spirituality this moral inheritance will evaporate.
Great but that's speculative. No evidence for any of that.
No evidence of your biblical god nor his morality.
The Flying Spaghetti Monster and Raptor Jesus also disagree with you. They believe in secular humanism. They created the World they would know. Prove that wrong.
Avoid Harris, he, like Dawkins, is simplistic to the point of embarrassment.
Thanks for the suggestion but no thanks. My experience has shown me otherwise. Instead I will enjoy the likes of Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, David Dennett, Dan Barker,Lawrence Krauss. Their debates and their books.
At the time of Christ the Roman Empire ruled. What kind of world do you think we would have today if this empire had been allowed to continue? Do you think, without the Church's influence, it would have suddenly become moral or would its darkness have continued to the present day? If it did Europe today might be in complete darkness. An Orwellian prison.edit on 15-2-2014 by EnPassant because: (no reason given)
the Church - right
KNOW YOUR POPES - enjoy
www.facebook.com...
Yes, there have been evil popes. So what? There have been evil non religious as well, Stalin, Hussein, Hitler (nominal religious). Evil has sometimes entered the Church. It is a pity but that does not make the Church evil. It makes it imperfect. There used to be Communist spies in the U.S. Does that make the U.S. Communist?
Then by that argument, there are many other institutions just as adequately equipped to handle the responsibilities you place on the church. None are any less perfect than the church - that is to say, the church is as guilty as any of them.
I only used the Church as one example. There are many other examples I could have used, as sources of morality. If mankind is not spiritual it will not be moral. It will be overcome by evil. Humanism cannot overcome evil because evil is a spiritual reality.edit on 15-2-2014 by EnPassant because: (no reason given)
We just had this discussion. You have been provided with examples of nonspiritual societies that functioned just as well as, if not better than, a spiritual society.
If you are talking about the societies mentioned in the quote from Sam Harris, no, these are not nonspiritual. They have a rich inheritance from Christianity. Consider North Korea instead, where religion is suppressed.edit on 15-2-2014 by EnPassant because: (no reason given)
Since your Google button appears to be broken, I'll help you out:
commonsenseatheism.com...
www.danielmiessler.com...
www.alternet.org...
Don't forget to actually read the articles, as well.
AfterInfinity
EnPassant
AfterInfinity
EnPassant
AfterInfinity
EnPassant
racasan
EnPassant
Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by EnPassant
You said a society without religion would fall apart. I showed societies that are primarily non-religous that are not only not falling apart but are doing better than societies that are primarily religious. You say that is "amateurish". Whatever logic helps you sleep at night.
But there is more to it than this. The moral fibre of the world depends on the spiritual substance of the world. If mankind loses its spirituality this moral inheritance will evaporate.
Great but that's speculative. No evidence for any of that.
No evidence of your biblical god nor his morality.
The Flying Spaghetti Monster and Raptor Jesus also disagree with you. They believe in secular humanism. They created the World they would know. Prove that wrong.
Avoid Harris, he, like Dawkins, is simplistic to the point of embarrassment.
Thanks for the suggestion but no thanks. My experience has shown me otherwise. Instead I will enjoy the likes of Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, David Dennett, Dan Barker,Lawrence Krauss. Their debates and their books.
At the time of Christ the Roman Empire ruled. What kind of world do you think we would have today if this empire had been allowed to continue? Do you think, without the Church's influence, it would have suddenly become moral or would its darkness have continued to the present day? If it did Europe today might be in complete darkness. An Orwellian prison.edit on 15-2-2014 by EnPassant because: (no reason given)
the Church - right
KNOW YOUR POPES - enjoy
www.facebook.com...
Yes, there have been evil popes. So what? There have been evil non religious as well, Stalin, Hussein, Hitler (nominal religious). Evil has sometimes entered the Church. It is a pity but that does not make the Church evil. It makes it imperfect. There used to be Communist spies in the U.S. Does that make the U.S. Communist?
Then by that argument, there are many other institutions just as adequately equipped to handle the responsibilities you place on the church. None are any less perfect than the church - that is to say, the church is as guilty as any of them.
I only used the Church as one example. There are many other examples I could have used, as sources of morality. If mankind is not spiritual it will not be moral. It will be overcome by evil. Humanism cannot overcome evil because evil is a spiritual reality.edit on 15-2-2014 by EnPassant because: (no reason given)
We just had this discussion. You have been provided with examples of nonspiritual societies that functioned just as well as, if not better than, a spiritual society.
If you are talking about the societies mentioned in the quote from Sam Harris, no, these are not nonspiritual. They have a rich inheritance from Christianity. Consider North Korea instead, where religion is suppressed.edit on 15-2-2014 by EnPassant because: (no reason given)
Since your Google button appears to be broken, I'll help you out:
commonsenseatheism.com...
www.danielmiessler.com...
www.alternet.org...
Don't forget to actually read the articles, as well.
This is utter hogwash. Propaganda.
The Church made modern science possible. It made education possible.
In past times the Church funded science. Some of the world's greatest intellects believed in God - Einstein, Kurt Godel, Newton...
. . . I came—though the child of entirely irreligious (Jewish) parents—to a deep religiousness, which, however, reached an abrupt end at the age of twelve. Through the reading of popular scientific books I soon reached the conviction that much in the stories of the Bible could not be true. The consequence was a positively fanatic orgy of freethinking coupled with the impression that youth is intentionally being deceived by the state through lies; it was a crushing impression. Mistrust of every kind of authority grew out of this experience, a skeptical attitude toward the convictions that were alive in any specific social environment—an attitude that has never again left me, even though, later on, it has been tempered by a better insight into the causal connections. It is quite clear to me that the religious paradise of youth, which was thus lost, was a first attempt to free myself from the chains of the 'merely personal,' from an existence dominated by wishes, hopes, and primitive feelings. Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned as a liberation, and I soon noticed that many a man whom I had learned to esteem and to admire had found inner freedom and security in its pursuit. The mental grasp of this extra-personal world within the frame of our capabilities presented itself to my mind, half consciously, half unconsciously, as a supreme goal. Similarly motivated men of the present and of the past, as well as the insights they had achieved, were the friends who could not be lost. The road to this paradise was not as comfortable and alluring as the road to the religious paradise; but it has shown itself reliable, and I have never regretted having chosen it. - Albert Einstein
Gödel left a fourteen-point outline of his philosophical beliefs in his papers. Points relevant to the ontological proof include:
4. There are other worlds and rational beings of a different and higher kind.
5. The world in which we live is not the only one in which we shall live or have lived.
13. There is a scientific (exact) philosophy and theology, which deals with concepts of the highest abstractness; and this is also most highly fruitful for science.
14. Religions are, for the most part, bad—but religion is not.[1]
Definition 1: x is God-like if and only if x has as essential properties those and only those properties which are positive
Definition 2: A is an essence of x if and only if for every property B, x has B necessarily if and only if A entails B
Definition 3: x necessarily exists if and only if every essence of x is necessarily exemplified
Axiom 1: Any property entailed by—i.e., strictly implied by—a positive property is positive
Axiom 2: If a property is positive, then its negation is not positive
Axiom 3: The property of being God-like is positive
Axiom 4: If a property is positive, then it is necessarily positive
Axiom 5: Necessary existence is a positive property
Although born into an Anglican family, by his thirties Newton held a Christian faith that, had it been made public, would not have been considered orthodox by mainstream Christianity;[8] in recent times he has been described as a heretic
EnPassant
reply to post by AfterInfinity
I am not trying to say that Einstein, Godel and Newton were Christian. They believed in God, they were not atheist. Newton's 'heresy' has nothing to do with this. Your link is more cherry picking. By and large, the Church funded and encouraged science and made modern science possible.
EnPassant
AfterInfinity
EnPassant
AfterInfinity
EnPassant
AfterInfinity
EnPassant
racasan
EnPassant
Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by EnPassant
You said a society without religion would fall apart. I showed societies that are primarily non-religous that are not only not falling apart but are doing better than societies that are primarily religious. You say that is "amateurish". Whatever logic helps you sleep at night.
But there is more to it than this. The moral fibre of the world depends on the spiritual substance of the world. If mankind loses its spirituality this moral inheritance will evaporate.
Great but that's speculative. No evidence for any of that.
No evidence of your biblical god nor his morality.
The Flying Spaghetti Monster and Raptor Jesus also disagree with you. They believe in secular humanism. They created the World they would know. Prove that wrong.
Avoid Harris, he, like Dawkins, is simplistic to the point of embarrassment.
Thanks for the suggestion but no thanks. My experience has shown me otherwise. Instead I will enjoy the likes of Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, David Dennett, Dan Barker,Lawrence Krauss. Their debates and their books.
At the time of Christ the Roman Empire ruled. What kind of world do you think we would have today if this empire had been allowed to continue? Do you think, without the Church's influence, it would have suddenly become moral or would its darkness have continued to the present day? If it did Europe today might be in complete darkness. An Orwellian prison.edit on 15-2-2014 by EnPassant because: (no reason given)
the Church - right
KNOW YOUR POPES - enjoy
www.facebook.com...
Yes, there have been evil popes. So what? There have been evil non religious as well, Stalin, Hussein, Hitler (nominal religious). Evil has sometimes entered the Church. It is a pity but that does not make the Church evil. It makes it imperfect. There used to be Communist spies in the U.S. Does that make the U.S. Communist?
Then by that argument, there are many other institutions just as adequately equipped to handle the responsibilities you place on the church. None are any less perfect than the church - that is to say, the church is as guilty as any of them.
I only used the Church as one example. There are many other examples I could have used, as sources of morality. If mankind is not spiritual it will not be moral. It will be overcome by evil. Humanism cannot overcome evil because evil is a spiritual reality.edit on 15-2-2014 by EnPassant because: (no reason given)
We just had this discussion. You have been provided with examples of nonspiritual societies that functioned just as well as, if not better than, a spiritual society.
If you are talking about the societies mentioned in the quote from Sam Harris, no, these are not nonspiritual. They have a rich inheritance from Christianity. Consider North Korea instead, where religion is suppressed.edit on 15-2-2014 by EnPassant because: (no reason given)
Since your Google button appears to be broken, I'll help you out:
commonsenseatheism.com...
www.danielmiessler.com...
www.alternet.org...
Don't forget to actually read the articles, as well.
You still don't get my point. Mankind is kept alive because God is in the world. God's Light and Grace keep humanity safe. If mankind turns away from God it will fall into darkness. This is already happening in parts of the world. One link you provided mentions Denmark and Sweden. These are moral because, down through the ages, Christianity provided them with a moral foundation. They still have this inheritance. And besides, who is to say that many people in these societies are not religious or spiritual or believe in God? Someone once said that 100 truly good people can save the world. But if there is nobody in the world who is good - truly, spiritually good - what will become of the world? It is pointless referring me to articles such as these because the arguments in them are superficial and don't take into consideration the WHOLE WORLD AND ITS HISTORY. They are naive arguments. This is why I say Sam Harris & Co. are naive. The world has inherited its entire history. This is what needs to be taken into account. Anything else is cherry picking.
Krazysh0t
EnPassant
AfterInfinity
EnPassant
AfterInfinity
EnPassant
AfterInfinity
EnPassant
racasan
EnPassant
Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by EnPassant
You said a society without religion would fall apart. I showed societies that are primarily non-religous that are not only not falling apart but are doing better than societies that are primarily religious. You say that is "amateurish". Whatever logic helps you sleep at night.
But there is more to it than this. The moral fibre of the world depends on the spiritual substance of the world. If mankind loses its spirituality this moral inheritance will evaporate.
Great but that's speculative. No evidence for any of that.
No evidence of your biblical god nor his morality.
The Flying Spaghetti Monster and Raptor Jesus also disagree with you. They believe in secular humanism. They created the World they would know. Prove that wrong.
Avoid Harris, he, like Dawkins, is simplistic to the point of embarrassment.
Thanks for the suggestion but no thanks. My experience has shown me otherwise. Instead I will enjoy the likes of Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, David Dennett, Dan Barker,Lawrence Krauss. Their debates and their books.
At the time of Christ the Roman Empire ruled. What kind of world do you think we would have today if this empire had been allowed to continue? Do you think, without the Church's influence, it would have suddenly become moral or would its darkness have continued to the present day? If it did Europe today might be in complete darkness. An Orwellian prison.edit on 15-2-2014 by EnPassant because: (no reason given)
the Church - right
KNOW YOUR POPES - enjoy
www.facebook.com...
Yes, there have been evil popes. So what? There have been evil non religious as well, Stalin, Hussein, Hitler (nominal religious). Evil has sometimes entered the Church. It is a pity but that does not make the Church evil. It makes it imperfect. There used to be Communist spies in the U.S. Does that make the U.S. Communist?
Then by that argument, there are many other institutions just as adequately equipped to handle the responsibilities you place on the church. None are any less perfect than the church - that is to say, the church is as guilty as any of them.
I only used the Church as one example. There are many other examples I could have used, as sources of morality. If mankind is not spiritual it will not be moral. It will be overcome by evil. Humanism cannot overcome evil because evil is a spiritual reality.edit on 15-2-2014 by EnPassant because: (no reason given)
We just had this discussion. You have been provided with examples of nonspiritual societies that functioned just as well as, if not better than, a spiritual society.
If you are talking about the societies mentioned in the quote from Sam Harris, no, these are not nonspiritual. They have a rich inheritance from Christianity. Consider North Korea instead, where religion is suppressed.edit on 15-2-2014 by EnPassant because: (no reason given)
Since your Google button appears to be broken, I'll help you out:
commonsenseatheism.com...
www.danielmiessler.com...
www.alternet.org...
Don't forget to actually read the articles, as well.
You still don't get my point. Mankind is kept alive because God is in the world. God's Light and Grace keep humanity safe. If mankind turns away from God it will fall into darkness. This is already happening in parts of the world. One link you provided mentions Denmark and Sweden. These are moral because, down through the ages, Christianity provided them with a moral foundation. They still have this inheritance. And besides, who is to say that many people in these societies are not religious or spiritual or believe in God? Someone once said that 100 truly good people can save the world. But if there is nobody in the world who is good - truly, spiritually good - what will become of the world? It is pointless referring me to articles such as these because the arguments in them are superficial and don't take into consideration the WHOLE WORLD AND ITS HISTORY. They are naive arguments. This is why I say Sam Harris & Co. are naive. The world has inherited its entire history. This is what needs to be taken into account. Anything else is cherry picking.
To sum you up, "A society without religion will fall apart, except when it doesn't." Seriously, you can't make a statement like, "A society without religion will fall apart," then make caveats and rationalizations when someone provides proof to you of a primarily secular society that not only isn't falling apart, but is more successful then non-secular countries. By the way, Japan was on that list of secular societies and while Christianity did get a toehold in Japan it was NEVER at any point in history a primarily Christian country. So the existence of that country on the list literally proves you wrong in every way.
Also, I'd like to know how you think there is a difference between countries like Norway and Sweden and the United States. You claim Norway and Sweden's morals are built on Christian values and morals so that is why they are successful despite being secular. But the United States (predominantly religious) is becoming morally bankrupt as it loses its religious base. You know the SAME religious base that supposedly instilled morals and values into Norway and Sweden. You have a logic breakdown and through your rationalizations and trying to justify your flimsy premise you fail to see this.edit on 15-2-2014 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)
But the United States (predominantly religious) is becoming morally bankrupt as it loses its religious base.
EnPassant
But the United States (predominantly religious) is becoming morally bankrupt as it loses its religious base.
Yes, and it is because it is losing its spiritual base that it is becoming corrupt. That is my point. The U.S. differs from Sweden and Denmark, obviously. Why has its religious/moral foundation failed it? Perhaps because there is so much money and power in the U.S. There could be many reasons why the U.S. descended into corruption so quickly. It would have been corrupted even faster without its moral, spiritual foundation.
Krazysh0t
EnPassant
But the United States (predominantly religious) is becoming morally bankrupt as it loses its religious base.
Yes, and it is because it is losing its spiritual base that it is becoming corrupt. That is my point. The U.S. differs from Sweden and Denmark, obviously. Why has its religious/moral foundation failed it? Perhaps because there is so much money and power in the U.S. There could be many reasons why the U.S. descended into corruption so quickly. It would have been corrupted even faster without its moral, spiritual foundation.
You act like the United States is the only country crippled by corruption from money and power greed. Japan's debt to gdp is currently 211.70%. The EU, which you may recognize as the economic body that governs countries such as Norway and Sweden, is contemplating on doing European wide Cyprus cuts. Give me a break, you suffer from the world revolves around America syndrome. This just isn't true and the actions of one country aren't dooming the rest of the world. There is just as much of what you consider "evil" in the rest of the world, YET secular countries maintaining high standards of equality and health despite this. You ignore all this to try to paint America on some moral descent into the seventh layer of hell or something. Because frankly that is what morally bankrupt means. Devoid of morals. Yet this isn't true either. There is just as much good things going on in this country being done by secularists and non-secularists. Your argument is flawed.
Krazysh0t
reply to post by frazzle
I know. That wasn't my point. I was trying to show to the person I was responding to that he is looking at America in a vacuum. He makes it sound like the changing actions of our country due to adopting a more secularist society are dooming it into moral bankruptcy. I argue that he is putting too much weight on the events in our country when it can be shown that other countries have their own problems and can still find the time have good morals without religion. Not to mention he is trying to warp direct evidence that contradicts his worldview into somehow supporting it.
AfterInfinity
reply to post by EnPassant
The Church made modern science possible. It made education possible.
But telling people they'll burn for all of eternity if they don't put their faith in God and their money in the collection basket isn't propaganda?
AfterInfinity
EnPassant
reply to post by AfterInfinity
I am not trying to say that Einstein, Godel and Newton were Christian. They believed in God, they were not atheist. Newton's 'heresy' has nothing to do with this. Your link is more cherry picking. By and large, the Church funded and encouraged science and made modern science possible.
Did you just ignore the link about all the scientists that were persecuted? Theism cannot take credit for modern science anymore than communism or nazism can.edit on 15-2-2014 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)
Krazysh0t
reply to post by frazzle
Being that corruption has existed as long as money has existed, I'd say that a community being secular or not has little to do with its moral state. Case in point, the Catholic church of the middle ages and its indulgence program. Here is an example of a religious organization, with all the morals that it preaches and all, letting those very same morals take a backseat to money and power. Therefore, secularism has little to do with whether a society is bad or not.
No, I never said Christianity owns morality. Christianity borrowed from many things. Yes, morality existed prior to Christ. See The Axial Age