It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by beezzer
I'm not against the voter ID issue at all, it makes sense to me. I just think the republican motivations behind it are more than obvious. The majority of the people that do not have ID's are democrats, if it were the other way around you wouldn't hear them say anything about it. Voter fraud rarely ever happens, it is a non-issue.
An analysis of state data related to Pennsylvania's new voter ID law suggests that minority voters in Philadelphia will have a tougher time than white voters in getting the credentials to vote in November.
The study found that voters in the city's most heavily African American voting divisions are 85 percent more likely to lack PennDot credentials than voters in predominantly white divisions.
And voters in heavily Hispanic neighborhoods are more than twice as likely to lack PennDot ID, the study showed. Manik-Perlman said there was a similar pattern in heavily Asian neighborhoods.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
Good thread, and I don't have an explanation except for grimy party politics, but I heard something today and I had to go check it out and it is almost true!! I heard that the state of Missouri has more registered voters than it does residents.
Turns out that it is kind of true. They have 4.1 million registered voters, and only 6.1 million residents. It isn't technically "more," but it is an unbelievably high percentage!!
Maybe Obama, and Romney, and our Governor Scott here in Florida are all correct, and they need to be restricting voter access as much as possible to make sure everyone is who they say they is!
I wonder what other states look like?
According to your argument, you'd rather let 10,000 people vote illegally, (probably democrat) than to keep those 10,000 people from voting illegally and perhaps "disenfranchising" 1 or 2 who don't have IDs.
Face it, your motive is to get as many votes as possible, legal or illegal; you don't care and you've already proven that.
If your right to vote isn't worth the effort of obtaining ID, then you don't deserve that right.
Originally posted by Domo1
Someone explain this gently to me. Why is it an issue if only active military is allowed an extra few days? I thought the point in allowing that was so that they had time to get the votes in from wherever they are.
Originally posted by axslinger
In my opinion, this legal back-and-forth precedence was set by GW in 2000. However, it wan't just GW. See, Algore was trying to use the courts to win as well. At the end of the day, the election was settled in court. Some say that Bush lost the election; no, he won. As I recall, he was in office for 8 years sooooo, to me that means he won.
Gore tried to play a similar game and only have recounts in democrat heavy counties. They were both to blame for the whole debacle. I also believe the correct solution would have been to recount the entire state but they were too stupid to think of that.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
They have 4.1 million registered voters, and only 6.1 million residents. It isn't technically "more," but it is an unbelievably high percentage!!
Maybe Obama, and Romney, and our Governor Scott here in Florida are all correct, and they need to be restricting voter access as much as possible to make sure everyone is who they say they is!
Originally posted by something wicked
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
Good thread, and I don't have an explanation except for grimy party politics, but I heard something today and I had to go check it out and it is almost true!! I heard that the state of Missouri has more registered voters than it does residents.
Turns out that it is kind of true. They have 4.1 million registered voters, and only 6.1 million residents. It isn't technically "more," but it is an unbelievably high percentage!!
Maybe Obama, and Romney, and our Governor Scott here in Florida are all correct, and they need to be restricting voter access as much as possible to make sure everyone is who they say they is!
I wonder what other states look like?
Hi, apologies if you covered this later in the thread, but if there are 4.1 million registered voters and 'only' 6.1 million residents... doesn't that mean there is a delta of 2.1 million that aren't registered voters? have you got your numbers the wrong way around? If not I don't see the problem
Originally posted by wwiilliiaamm
Besides the generalities, please give the readers a source for the number of "VOTER FRAUD" over the last twenty years. The reason why I ask for this information is simple. On this thread, we see several videos, quotes, etc. which explain "ELECTION FRAUD" which was a benefit to the GOP.
Fraud by individual voters is both irrational and extremely rare. ... Each act of voter fraud risks five years in prison and a $10,000 fine - but yields at most one incremental vote. The single vote is simply not worth the price.
Because voter fraud is essentially irrational, it is not surprising that no credible evidence suggests a voter fraud epidemic. ... Indeed, evidence from the microscopically scrutinized 2004 gubernatorial election in Washington State actually reveals just the opposite: though voter fraud does happen, it happens approximately 0.0009% of the time. The similarly closely-analyzed 2004 election in Ohio revealed a voter fraud rate of 0.00004%. National Weather Service data shows that Americans are struck and killed by lightning about as often.
Many vivid anecdotes of purported voter fraud have been proven false or do not demonstrate fraud. ... In Missouri in 2000, for example, the Secretary of State claimed that 79 voters were registered with addresses at vacant lots, but subsequent investigation revealed that the lots in question actually housed valid and legitimate residences. Similarly, a 1995 investigation into votes allegedly cast in Baltimore by deceased voters and those with disenfranchising felony convictions revealed that the voters in question were both alive and felony-free.
Each act of voter fraud risks five years in prison and a $10,000 fine - but yields at most one incremental vote. The single vote is simply not worth the price.
You also forgot to mention that they're racist too, or did I somehow miss that post....
Ohio republicans and Romney are terrorists that want to limit voting access to all citizens.