It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by paratus
Watch the video, a bottle did not draw blood like that.
Fighting words
Originally posted by muzzleflash
If you think that someone has a right to use violence against someone they disagree with over a verbal debate, than you need to leave this country now please.
This country is founded upon the protection of rights.
You do NOT have a right to hit someone.
You DO have a right to argue back, or choose to IGNORE them.
Hitting someone makes you a criminal, especially if it's over beliefs.
Originally posted by Maslo
Originally posted by Kryties
Originally posted by Maslo
IMHO.
Would this be the same opinion that anyone who doesn't agree with your narrow view of the world should be jailed, deported, executed etc etc?
Not much of an opinion if you ask me.
What the hell are you talking about? Thats not my opinion. I dont even support exections..
Stop with the immature trolling and ad hominems already..
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by Indigo5
As Samuel Johnson once wrote..Every man has a right to utter what he thinks truth, and every other man has a right to knock him down for it.
You believe in garbage than.
You have no right to hit me for what I say. If you do I will have to use full force to protect myself.
Originally posted by paratus
reply to post by Indigo5
There are more videos on the interwebs.
All of which could be used as evidence.
feel free to search
pics, and it DID happen
Originally posted by neformore
If you go into a bear pit with the intention of provoking a bear, chances are you'll provoke a bear.
Stupid is as stupid does.
All this crap about constitutional rights doesn't cover up deliberate provocative stupidity does it?
Originally posted by muzzleflash
If you think that someone has a right to use violence against someone they disagree with over a verbal debate, than you need to leave this country now please.
This country is founded upon the protection of rights.
You do NOT have a right to hit someone.
You DO have a right to argue back, or choose to IGNORE them.
Hitting someone makes you a criminal, especially if it's over beliefs.
Originally posted by grey580
Whitney has been thoroughly discredited by later decisions. See Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494, at 507 (1951). These later decisions have fashioned the principle that the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.
Originally posted by Violater1
Originally posted by mysterioustranger
A bloody pigs head was stuck on a pole and waved at the Muslims while Christians screamed at little kids that...
"Youre going to Hell!"..and "Allah is Satan!"
I was there as an EMT and treated no injuries.edit on 06-10-2010 by mysterioustranger because: grammar
Pictures or it never happened.
What you actually called them was vicious sub-humans who don't have a right to walk this earth.
Still not an opinion I listen to, I don't take extremist points of view like yourself.
Whitney has been thoroughly discredited by later decisions. See Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494, at 507 (1951). These later decisions have fashioned the principle that the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by Furbs
No, not at all. In fact, by judging the animus of the Muslims - which is much greater than that showed by the Christians - it is easily as likely, or even more likely that they met them at the lines because they couldn't tolerate the presence of Christians in "their" Muslims town protesting their festival.