It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by Furbs
Actually, that carnival was issued a permit by the city to be used for their festival. They were leasing it, and as such, hold certain property rights under Michigan law. A
They purchased a permit for a particular area within the city; outside the lines is where they protested. Legally.
They infiltrated the festival grounds to protest, which wasn't covered under the permit festival organizers obtained.
It appears to me that they were outside the lines, since they were behind the officers who defended those lines.
Wow. The ignorance and hatred for people you consider "different" to the narrow view of life you cling to is astounding.
Civilized humans usually first learn how to write... and then they learn (somewhere in those school books) that we (humans) are all created the same, have same quality in genes.... But not sure if that can reach your 'civilised' super-human head.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Kryties
Baseless drivel. Nowhere in my post is stated anything to imply what you wrote. Unless by "different" you mean "with a tendency to violent response", then I stand by my statement.
reply to post by SuperFrog
Why on Earth do you bring up genes?
Originally posted by Hr2burn
Gosh! I thought it was "only the radical extremist Muslims" that were violent! Muck the Fuslims!!!!! It is funny that a megaphone is a violation of the ordinance but throwing everything you can get your filthy hands on is just fine....obviously.
Pssshft...whatever.
Originally posted by TKDRL
I wouldn't condone a soldier beating the living crap out of a westboro nutjob for protesting a funeral with bile and hatred, but I certainly could understand it.
Originally posted by Maslo
Some people try to excuse rape or transfer some of the blame to the victim by stating that victim had revealing dress or was acting "slutty". You will surely agree with me that such a notion is ridiculous.
In an analogous way, some people in this thread try to excuse the crime of an assault by stating that the victim had an insulting sign. Such a notion is ridiculous, too, for the same reasons.
Riiiiiiiight..... Who was raped at this festival again? What the hell are you talking about?
Your hate-filled rants are getting less and less sensicle.
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by Furbs
Right... And were to trust the objectivity of a deerborne newspapers claim?
As long as the police were present - as they were - it seems unbelievable that they would cross those lines without a police response.
Also, their throwing things at protestors while they were still outside the lines - what explanation do you have for that???edit on 27-6-2012 by dontreally because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Kryties
It's really this simple: if the Christians had not gone to the Muslim festival carrying hate signs and shouting obscenities at the Muslims this would not have happened.
You get exactly what's coming to you and no more than you deserve.
Some people try to excuse rape or transfer some of the blame to the victim by stating that victim had revealing dress or was acting "slutty". You will surely agree with me that such a notion is ridiculous.
In an analogous way, some people in this thread try to excuse the crime of an assault by stating that the victim had an insulting sign. Such a notion is ridiculous, too, for the same reasons.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Kryties
Not raped, but assaulted.
You seem to lack basic reading comprehension. I only wrote simple sentences, come on, it is not that hard.
Originally posted by Maslo
Some people try to excuse rape or transfer some of the blame to the victim by stating that victim had revealing dress or was acting "slutty". You will surely agree with me that such a notion is ridiculous.
In an analogous way, some people in this thread try to excuse the crime of an assault by stating that the victim had an insulting sign. Such a notion is ridiculous, too, for the same reasons.
Originally posted by EvanB
reply to post by Muckster
Seriously
You need to get out more and take your tinted specks off.. Around my area there are none whites allowed areas.. In Alum Rock for instance, if you are a single white female you will not make it through the area un-molested.. In Halesowen, I was at ASDA. In the multi-storey car park was a big gang of muslims sexually harassing a white woman trying to get to her car... Peaceful and respectful hey?? Needless to say I waded in!
I can cite lots of instances... They are hated in my part of the country and with damn good reason.. When they reach a certain level of population, they become an aggressive, regressive, intolerant, backward stain that is hard to shift..