posted on May, 7 2012 @ 06:40 AM
reply to post by 0subsZero13
you people are so brainwashed it is unbelievable. How on earth can you say this is okay??
I'm genuinely curious as to what the negative aspect of this would be.
Not trying to sound condescending or sarcastic, I just really can't think of why there is a problem with getting a child's fingerprints.
The only thing people against it are saying is "Because it's my child, not the governments." (which I'm not arguing there, but still - what does
that have to do with the local or state government having your children's fingerprints on file?)
"Because the government is too invasive already, what's next soldiers sleeping in our houses?" Right...because we all know marijuana truly
a gateway drug....
(Okay...no more sarcasm. Honestly though, this is a faaaar reach from housing soldiers.)
Those that don't see it as such a big deal (the ones you say are brainwashed) have given their reasons, and while it is a grim reason - it's
legitimate. In cases of abduction, it can be used to identify a child's body. And no, parents are not always able to ID a child if something has
So why should I be against it? Where is the harm? That they could possibly frame a child later in life - they can do that anyway, with or without
So what is it? Why/how could this legitimately be used against a child later (or at the present time) in life?
And as far as brainwashing goes - fear mongering and using scare tactics don't just come from big government to citizens. It goes both ways. Just
because it's coming from an alternative source (not the MSM), doesn't mean it can't be fear mongering and brainwashing.