It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
....from the real anti-christ which is the spirit of Satan
Here is a screen-capture from my order confirmation from Amazon.
It's not been past you to lie in the past, what prevents you from also lying about what books you're reading?
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
The popes throughout history are only products of a certain "religious" establishment that is NOT semitic in origin. Basically non-semitic white people (no offense towards white people at all) decided they knew exactly how to interpret a semitic religion.
No not quite. Christianity was originally founded by jews. Primarily Jesus himself and then his disciples and the thousands they converted. Christianity is what judaism was supposed to be. What got Jesus crucified was he dared to challenge the pharisees and Sanhedrin and accused them of hypocrisy.
OK, so explain the difference.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by jmdewey60
"Israel" is to be understood today as the people we normally call Christians.
No, Israel and the church are mutually exclusive. They have different promises and different covenants. The mystery Paul reveals in the NT is that gentiles get to be "fellow" heirs to the promise. He doesn't say gentiles get to be the "new" heirs.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by jmdewey60
"Israel" is to be understood today as the people we normally call Christians.
No, Israel and the church are mutually exclusive. They have different promises and different covenants. The mystery Paul reveals in the NT is that gentiles get to be "fellow" heirs to the promise. He doesn't say gentiles get to be the "new" heirs.
OK, so explain the difference.
son of perdition
man of sin
antichrist
the wicked one
the beast
the little horn
the prince that shall come
the one who comes in his own name
King of Babylon
Prince of Persia
King of Tyre
But more than the label of "messiah", the world will worship him as god in the flesh. He'll claim to be Jesus of Nazareth.
But it is only theory which ties these all together.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
But more than the label of "messiah", the world will worship him as god in the flesh. He'll claim to be Jesus of Nazareth.
That you would quote a fictional book claim as fact would be the sign of a true cultist.
Christianity is what judaism was supposed to be.
. . . we follow the 10 commandments when they do not, except for the saturday sabbath thing which i am working on figuring out.
Based on my studies of all sides, the amillenialist camp I had to abandon.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Based on my studies of all sides, the amillenialist camp I had to abandon.
That would be an interesting thread you should do.
You could explain your rationale for why you made the switch to Darby-ism.
Christ's disciples asked Him if He was going to restore the kingdom at that time, and Jesus never denies that He will restore the kingdom and rule, He tells them it's not their business to know when He will.
'God Almighty'
That would be a personal belief, based on probably a theory you read somewhere or heard someone speak on.
God is a God with many names and many titles and to each person in Scripture God revealed himself differently because His relationship was different with each person.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Christ's disciples asked Him if He was going to restore the kingdom at that time, and Jesus never denies that He will restore the kingdom and rule, He tells them it's not their business to know when He will.
What?
So, according to your logic, since Jesus never denied his throne would be on the Moon, then his throne must be on the Moon.