It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Anyway, if you have the time to read through ... give us your thoughts! IMO, the main participants are schmae, silo13, dav1d, myself (wildtimes), if you care to read through our posts to get up to speed.
As I'm sure everyone here is finding out, it's very hard not to draw certain conclusions when parents of a missing child don't behave the way you would expect them to in this situation. But, I have to say that up to this point, I am very suspicious of this mother, simply because of her conflicting statements.
Like I said earlier, I'm not convinced she necessarily killed the baby or anything like that, but something in my gut tells me this woman is behind this for the purposes of garnering some attention. There are quite a few people like this out there, as sad as that may be.
There are various theories regarding the cause of Munchausen Syndrome. Dowdell and Foster theorize that a mother may feel that a sick child can bring her closer to her spouse. It is more likely, however, that mothers suffering from this disorder “have had an emotionally deprived childhood with a high probability of a history of physical abuse,”
The women are most likely depressed and insecure, and channel their personal inadequacies into abusive behavior, which in turn produces gratifying attention for themselves. The environment of a hospital also gives the mother a chance to rid herself of parental responsibility while medical personnel tend to her child. If a mother realizes an increasing detachment from the family in the father of her child, she may resort to hurting her child in order to restore cohesiveness in the family. An absent spouse also leaves the mother plenty of time alone with her child to inflict injuries and sickness that she otherwise may not be able to inflict in the presence of her husband.
The witness statements involving a man carrying a baby down the street in the middle of the night is very weird. And, while it does take the heat off of the mom by appearance, I am not quick to take her out of the equation just yet.
I feel this baby is still alive. I hope I'm right. Another thing I would like to add is, please remember that when these things happen, there are many freakos out there that contact the police with bogus information,
It's always bothered me that the dog never barked if someone actually did come into the house and take this child and walked around gathering cell phones.
Who knows? We could be looking at a Munchausen by Proxy case gone wrong - meaning Lisa got sick but they hadn’t escalated into the ‘hospital phase’ yet.
You are on the ball, Silo.....very interesting, indeed.
Edit to add: Perhaps you should consider work in investigation, Silo, if you do not already do such work. I'm being serious. Not many people can maintain an unbiased viewpoint while examining crimes, but you do it very well. Sometimes, even though I've had an opportunity to work on both sides of the legal spectrum, I even have a hard time with it....LOL
LUD (Local Usage Details) is a detailed record of local calls made and received from a particular phone number. These records are regularly available to police in the United States with a court order, and were traditionally subject to the same restrictions as telephone tapping.
LUDs may be legally used by the police without first obtaining a warrant, as determined by Smith v. Maryland (1979).
Other terms for call records include CDR (Call Detail Records) or SMDR (Station Message Detail Recording). These terms normally apply to "raw call records" before they have been processed to apply locations and rates.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by Dav1d
Actually I do not believe that has been established at all!
It was established via her former Ft Bragg friends, that she was prone to doing things that made her not cool to be around. Way back when they interviewed them. It's just hearsay, but it was established...
Originally posted by schmae
What if the other biological parents are granted temp. custody of the boys? Say the parents are arrested and when you get arrested your kids go to foster care UNLESS they have another family member willing and able to take them . So the 2 bio parents take their sons home and then allow those sons to speak with police unfettered? Interesting.
Sorry off the current topic, but my mind is all over the place today.
Took the words right out of my mouth, gabby. I've followed this thread from page 1 and some of the completely baseless speculation that is being thrown has gone beyond far-reaching to downright ridiculous.
Here's my theory. Deborah really really wants to be in a Hollywood movie and be famous and make lots of money. So she had a friend kidnap the child and take her to Europe while the the mom got drunk and made up a whole story to get attention knowing that someday she'd be able to garner a movie deal out of it. Meanwhile, Jeremy is a closet transgender who hates himself so much and is so insecure without Deborah that he'll go along with her story no matter what.
Thank you to whoever the poster was a couple of pages back that brought up the phone call in the middle of the night and provided more info on it. I had been wondering what had happened on that.
Tells me it was an intentional call though maybe a wrong number. I'd give a case a a cookies to find out what the numbers are to Jeremy's cell phone compared to Megan's number, and on down the line.
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by Redux
Took the words right out of my mouth, gabby. I've followed this thread from page 1 and some of the completely baseless speculation that is being thrown has gone beyond far-reaching to downright ridiculous.
And now you've added to it. Nice to have you here. Keep up the good work.
Peace
Cyndy Short’s abrupt exit from the Lisa Irwin saga strikes me as bad news for the missing baby and her family.
Based on what we’ve seen, the lawyer still representing Lisa’s parents, New Yorker Joe Tacopina, operates much differently. He’s spent little time in Kansas City and he thrives on interviews with the national media. I’m sure he wants a good outcome for his clients, Jeremy Irwin and Deborah Bradley, but he’s representing them because the case is high-profile.
There’s little use in asking why Short is off the case. That’s a matter between attorney and client and Short is too professional to drop any hints. Her departure is a small mystery within a very big mystery: What happened to baby Lisa Irwin.