It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
we were thrown back to a stone age state and had to live like cave men...so in effect we were cave people...
Originally posted by RadeonGFXRHumanGTXisAlien
No.
Cavemen, were the evolution of Homo antecessor.
Us modern day humans, are in no way related to them, we modern day humans were created by the annunaki, we didn't evolve we didn't destroy ourselves, since we were never cavemen.
Originally posted by blocula
probably the same way that these scientists were supressed and eliminated > www.rense.com...
History is written by the victors and the question is:
we were thrown back to a stone age state and had to live like cave men...so in effect we were cave people...
Originally posted by Hanslune
Oh you forgot to detail how I would be suppressed - remember you're the one who keeps saying people would be suppressed - I would think you'd be an expert on 'archaeological suppression? Or are you just making stuff up?
does the information in this link look like i'm making things up? theres around 30 links here within this link with evidence and if anyone would "actually read through them" they might be convinced that our history is a lie,because it is >>> www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
Originally posted by wirehead
Originally posted by Hanslune
Oh you forgot to detail how I would be suppressed - remember you're the one who keeps saying people would be suppressed - I would think you'd be an expert on 'archaeological suppression? Or are you just making stuff up?
Don't give the plot away so early!
Originally posted by blocula
probably the same way that these scientists were supressed and eliminated > www.rense.com...
These two strains of deaths, the one overtly caused by terrorists and the other suggestive of more covert means (for those unwilling to accept that these were just a very strange chain of coincidences) came at a time when the Soviet Union was struggling to find a way out of the trap it had set for itself through unconstrained defence spending to back an ideological psycho-political assault on the Western World. The Soviets were finding that they could not sustain their military in the face of dramatic improvements in Western military technology, and faced the prospect of economic collapse if they could not find some way of reform aside from the unthinkable step of dismantling the USSR and declaring that the whole arrangement had been a mistake.
In the late 1980s, the Strategic Defence Initiative and the realm of underwater warfare were the two leading areas of strategic defence for the Western World, and the threat that the US might actually start an SDI program resulted in numerous concessions from an increasingly nervous (and unstable USSR).
Originally posted by blocula
does the information in this link look like i'm making things up? theres around 30 links here within this link with evidence and if anyone would "actually read through them" they might be convinced that our history is a lie,because it is >>> www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
Originally posted by wirehead
Originally posted by Hanslune
Oh you forgot to detail how I would be suppressed - remember you're the one who keeps saying people would be suppressed - I would think you'd be an expert on 'archaeological suppression? Or are you just making stuff up?
Don't give the plot away so early!
Archeologist Francis Taylor stated that etchings in some nearby temples he translated suggested that they prayed to be spared from the great light that was coming to lay ruin to the city.
Originally posted by blocula
does the information in this link look like i'm making things up? theres around 30 links here within this link with evidence and if anyone would "actually read through them" they might be convinced that our history is a lie,because it is >>> www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
Originally posted by miniatus
Originally posted by LS650
I believe it's very possible there were past civilizations that were maybe as advanced as say the Roman Empire, but no more. I see claims all the time that plastics will last for literally thousands of years in landfills - so if there have been technically advanced societies, where is all the plastic? They just didn't make plastic? I doubt it.
Why would you doubt they made plastic? that's a silly assertion to make, no offense. .. plastic is a synthetic, why would you assume a previous advanced society must have mastered plastic?
They have developed plastics now that are plant based that biodegrade just fine and relatively fast ... maybe they were smart enough to skip the synthetic plastics..
And I tend to think that civilizations could have evolved technologically different.. they could be advanced while having entirely different technology.
Originally posted by punkinworks10
reply to post by blocula
Really? That's the best you can do? , dig up the same old tired drivel thY has been rehashed and discredited literally dozens of times already.. I'm surprised this thread is still open as there are numerous discussons already on this site on the subject. In my view the biggest argument against any previous "advanced" civilzation is, where did they get the iron ore that supplies a critical phase of development in the progression of any advancing society. More iron ore is mined in one day today than in all of the previous 4000 years of human history of iron use. Iron ore is found in a very specific geologic level. Any society that has reached the level of 20th century technology would have used so much iron ore that the signs of it would be unmistakable. We have in just the last 150 years used most of the readily available ore. And what did they use for energy? The technological progression would have left clear indications in the worlds coal seams.
I'm not a total "stick in the mud" on the idea that there have been a previous society that had reached a reasonably advanced level,say that of the 19th century. But it certain.ly wasn't humans and not with the past 10s of millions of years.
Originally posted by punkinworks10
reply to post by blocula
Really? That's the best you can do? , dig up the same old tired drivel thY has been rehashed and discredited literally dozens of times already.. I'm surprised this thread is still open as there are numerous discussons already on this site on the subject. In my view the biggest argument against any previous "advanced" civilzation is, where did they get the iron ore that supplies a critical phase of development in the progression of any advancing society. More iron ore is mined in one day today than in all of the previous 4000 years of human history of iron use. Iron ore is found in a very specific geologic level. Any society that has reached the level of 20th century technology would have used so much iron ore that the signs of it would be unmistakable. We have in just the last 150 years used most of the readily available ore. And what did they use for energy? The technological progression would have left clear indications in the worlds coal seams.
I'm not a total "stick in the mud" on the idea that there have been a previous society that had reached a reasonably advanced level,say that of the 19th century. But it certain.ly wasn't humans and not with the past 10s of millions of years.
The pyramids are still standing because they were built out of stone.
I dare you to make something out of metal that will last just as long.
If you were to out the Pyramid of Giza in Minnesota during the Ice Age, the glaciers that were a mile or two high, would have crushed it or smoothened it out into a hill.
Originally posted by blocula
you ^^^ call 73 pages of evidence,"that you'll probably never even read through" tired drivel??? denial,denial,denial.
The most puzzling aspect of the map is its depiction of Antarctica.