It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CobraCommander
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by CobraCommander
It's 2011 now, not ancient times!
Even in the 1970's you killed your wife....you see alot of jail time, ALOT!
Lol, I dont care when it was, no one should kill their wife... well, I can think of one example maybe.
Originally posted by CobraCommander
Originally posted by Aeons
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by Aeons
Their feelings on the matter are not relevant. The woman made the decision.... How is that so hard to understand? I mean jeez, I donate lots of things, my old cell phones, my old computers. Should I now worry that if some assclown uses them in a crime that I would be held liable for it?
Children aren't a cell phone or a car or a computer.
Children are ACTUAL REAL PEOPLE. With legal rights. Rights that no one else can sign away on their behalf.
Even if that's inconvenient.edit on 2011/6/3 by Aeons because: (no reason given)
Wrong. CHildren have no rights.
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by Aeons
So they are people, so what? How does that mean that a donor should be responsible? Seriously, it is a stupid stance. Don't donate guys, there are insane people out there that might hold you responsible for what the recipient makes out of your donation.
Originally posted by Aeons
reply to post by CobraCommander
There you go sonny. Am I really arguing against you? Are you sure you want to side with people whose ideas of "Fixing" the system mean that you have no legal rights so that you can't be held financial responsible? Or to make the children of the poor work instead of go to school so that the non-custodial parent doesn't have to pay support? Or people who think that children's rights are "garbage."
Are you really SURE that's your fraternity there?
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by Aeons
Thats probably why you are one of the few level headed people on this thread.....
I have been reading all your posts!
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by Aeons
If they think a donor should be responsible for them, then yes, I do....
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by CobraCommander
Children can not legally be subjected to contracts under the age of 18 or 21, whatever the legal age.
You men just don't get it do you! When you see a child well fed, clean and in good health......is'nt it obvious the mother is doing a good job? That means she is using the child support in a proper manner!
GOT IT??????????????????????????????????????
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by sonnny1
Child support has nothing to do with whether a woman is a feminist or not. It's about fighting for the right of the child to be cared for properly.......and that costs MONEY my friend!
Every child has the right to a roof over his/her head, decent food in it's mouth, clean clothes on it's back, electricity/gas for heating and lighting, dental/medical, haircuts, an education, phone (you do want contact don't you?)........
some of the responses on this board makes me wonder how the hell you were given the God given right to have kids because some of you here sure don't deserve to have children in any shape or form.
Originally posted by Aeons
Originally posted by CobraCommander
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by CobraCommander
It's 2011 now, not ancient times!
Even in the 1970's you killed your wife....you see alot of jail time, ALOT!
Lol, I dont care when it was, no one should kill their wife... well, I can think of one example maybe.
Too bad for you I'm probably the only person on this thread with an actual working marriage the first time, and my husband is an actual real man who acts like a real man, and he actually really likes me.
Tough stuff that. That I actually have all that "conservative" "real family" stuff, and my man's actually a happy guy. Killer.
Originally posted by Aeons
Originally posted by CobraCommander
Originally posted by Aeons
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by Aeons
Their feelings on the matter are not relevant. The woman made the decision.... How is that so hard to understand? I mean jeez, I donate lots of things, my old cell phones, my old computers. Should I now worry that if some assclown uses them in a crime that I would be held liable for it?
Children aren't a cell phone or a car or a computer.
Children are ACTUAL REAL PEOPLE. With legal rights. Rights that no one else can sign away on their behalf.
Even if that's inconvenient.edit on 2011/6/3 by Aeons because: (no reason given)
Wrong. CHildren have no rights.
And there it is. Children have no rights in this man's view.
A man who complains about slavery, believes that children haven't any rights. Which totally explains why they don't matter.
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by sonnny1
Child support has nothing to do with whether a woman is a feminist or not. It's about fighting for the right of the child to be cared for properly.......and that costs MONEY my friend!
Every child has the right to a roof over his/her head, decent food in it's mouth, clean clothes on it's back, electricity/gas for heating and lighting, dental/medical, haircuts, an education, phone (you do want contact don't you?)........
some of the responses on this board makes me wonder how the hell you were given the God given right to have kids because some of you here sure don't deserve to have children in any shape or form.
Originally posted by Aeons
reply to post by sonnny1
I haven't made any men out to be ANY of those things even once in this entire thread. Not ONCE.
"Unlike male Family Annihilators, who kill their spouse and children and do it over money very often."