It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Jan, 26, 2010 Obama Going To Trial On His Illegal Alien Status

page: 8
6
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 07:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Lillydale
 


The graying president has purple lips, that freeks me out.
No, it's not about race. It's about Islamic principle, which states that if someone leaves Islam then they must return or be killed. That puts a target on our president's back. Further, Barakah (Arabic: blessing) Hussain (Arabic: leader) Obama (son) knows very well the customs and principles of Islam and knows that by sending troops to Afghanistan he is promoting fard ayn in dar ul Harb. That means he invited terrorism on to American soil.




posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 07:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by JJay55
See, here's the major thing you are missing. Barakah Hussain Obama was born to a muslim father, that makes him a muslim.


It does not, but why would it matter if he was a muslim? Do you think the POTUS has got to be a Christian?

What if he was a Jew, Hindu, Mormon, Pastafarian etc etc. - does that mean none of them could be POTUS?

snip a rant that has nothing at all to do with topic



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 08:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by JJay55
reply to post by dereks
 


See, here's the major thing you are missing. Barakah Hussain Obama was born to a muslim father, that makes him a muslim.


It is a religion, not a race. My parents were both Catholic. Quick quick, what religion am I?


Further, he attended a madrassas in Indonesia which also makes him part of the muslim community.


I attended Catholic School for 10 years. Which community am I part of?

Which Muslim community is that exactly? Is he Shia or Sunni?


So as far as Islam is concerned, he is one of their subjects.


It does not matter what Islam thinks of Obama. It only matters what Obama thinks of the U.S.


Now what happens next is he is invited back to Islam, since he ventured into a Christian church. If he refuses to go back to Islam he then becomes an apostate.


When will this happen and how do you know? Get and invite to his invite?


While it matters his legality in the US, more importantly is the view from Islam and where he belongs.


Are you claiming that a religion's view of Obama is more important that his view of it? You do know that even Islam is splintered like Christianity, right? You seem to think that a Muslim is a Muslim which leads me to believe you are just saying things here. The complete lack of facts and evidence plays into that a bit too though.


Especially since we are at war with AQ. There are many Islamic principles that make a big difference and will become very important in the next few months in the conflict with the US.


Now why would you even say that and not tell us what they were. Either you do not really want to warn anyone about what you know, or you really really hoped someone would ask you to go on. Please do.



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 08:07 PM
link   
Obama was chosen to be the president, and not by the people. So with that, there would be no way he will be ousted.



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 08:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by JJay55
reply to post by Lillydale
 


The graying president has purple lips, that freeks me out.
No, it's not about race. It's about Islamic principle, which states that if someone leaves Islam then they must return or be killed.


Your sentence right there just proves my point. With some people it is about politics. With some people it is about partisan politics. With some people it is about people. With some people it is about race. With some people, it is apparently about religion. Please do not tell me that you really think that your view of what it is all about is the same as everyone else that dislikes Obama. Plenty of people that believe he is an American Christian hate him too.


That puts a target on our president's back.


You mean unlike Bush, Clinton, Bush who could all walk in and out of terrorist camps freely? They took cruises together? Being POTUS puts a target on his back. You only need one target. Muslims cannot kill him more than any other nut that would do so.


Further, Barakah (Arabic: blessing) Hussain (Arabic: leader) Obama (son) knows very well the customs and principles of Islam and knows that by sending troops to Afghanistan he is promoting fard ayn in dar ul Harb. That means he invited terrorism on to American soil.


I do not go by my birth name. Would you also show me the same disrespect as to refuse to acknowledge the name I legally go by now and insist on some foreign spelling of my first name in order to make it a different word? He goes by Barak, not barakah. My brother's name means "little king." Want to see his castle sometime?

Annnnnnnnny way. What on earth are you talking about??????

He has invited terrorism on to American Soil? What? Are you serious? What hole have you been in for the last decade where we have had MANY MANY MANY MANY MANY terror warnings - INSIDE THE U.S.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Do you think the twin towers were bombed in 93 because of what Barak just did?



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 08:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lillydale
Annnnnnnnny way. What on earth are you talking about??????

He has invited terrorism on to American Soil? What? Are you serious? What hole have you been in for the last decade where we have had MANY MANY MANY MANY MANY terror warnings - INSIDE THE U.S.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Do you think the twin towers were bombed in 93 because of what Barak just did?

We were bombed in 93 because of the same principles that Muslims represent. If Barak is indeed a muslim then those principles are in effect. if you can understand these implications then you can understand why this topic is important.



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 08:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by JJay55
We were bombed in 93 because of the same principles that Muslims represent. If Barak is indeed a muslim then those principles are in effect. if you can understand these implications then you can understand why this topic is important.


No, not really. I am failing to see how it makes any difference. When did we stop being under threat from terrorists and when does it start back up again, exactly?

We have been under threat for quite some time. Unless you can explain to me when there has been any difference in that.



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 08:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lillydale

Originally posted by JJay55
We were bombed in 93 because of the same principles that Muslims represent. If Barak is indeed a muslim then those principles are in effect. if you can understand these implications then you can understand why this topic is important.


No, not really. I am failing to see how it makes any difference. When did we stop being under threat from terrorists and when does it start back up again, exactly?

We have been under threat for quite some time. Unless you can explain to me when there has been any difference in that.

Because the administration has muslims strategically placed to be sympathetic to ME and Islamic cause. Thus giving the enemy the edge and foot in the door before we can defend ourselves.
This administration didn't want to bust the NYC, Denver, Toronto cells and they were forced to because the FBI leaked information and then if the administration didn't act they would have been responsible. In many cases the administration is blocking security. But the brave men and women in our agencies are not allowing terrorism to happen.
For instance, allowing the crotchbomber to be tried in federal court gave him rights and stopped him from singing like a canary about other terrorists who were on their way to our soil. This is the administrations policy to remove terrorism from seperate court systems. Now we don't have the intel we need thanks to Obama specifically.



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 08:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by Alxandro
 


First off, the Origional oath actually did count, but Obama figured there would be someone like YOU who would question it, so they took it again in the white house. Overdubbed my ass.

He was actually taking an oath to me.


sad man, really sad.


What is sad is that you actually believe he took an oath, to YOU.

Come on man, the oath he took was to people like Soros and his other puppet masters.
Do you honestly think he even cares for the common folk?

Anyway, back on topic, If you claim he took a second oath because people like me would "question it", then he should realize that many more people are questioning his citizenship.
Maybe he should kill two birds with one stone and take a third oath, only this time he should bring his birth certificate with him.



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 08:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by JJay55
Because the administration has muslims strategically placed to be sympathetic to ME and Islamic cause. Thus giving the enemy the edge and foot in the door before we can defend ourselves.


Now I see why you completely ignore my questions trying to validate any of your claims. If you will look at my posts, I asked some key questions about this information you claim to be privy to. You have not addressed one of them Looking at this post, it is obvious that you just insist on parroting this ridiculous fantasy of yours. Sorry but unless you can even attempt to start answering some of the questions about your tale, there is very little reason to take anything you say seriously. No proof, no evidence, avoidance of apporpriate questions, failure to even acknowledge proof against your story = deluded, trolling, stuck in a fantasy, or just lying for fun.

Either way, let me know when you have a fact or two to back this up. Let me know if you ever become confident enough in your story to actually attempt to answer my questions. Until then, I think I see your agenda and I am not interested.



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 08:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Alxandro
 



What is sad is that you actually believe he took an oath, to YOU.


Take a joke.


Come on man, the oath he took was to people like Soros and his other puppet masters.
any actual proof or more birther lies and slander?


Do you honestly think he even cares for the common folk?


Hell no, hes a politician.


Anyway, back on topic, If you claim he took a second oath because people like me would "question it", then he should realize that many more people are questioning his citizenship.


At last count there were 400,000 people (and I think that is a stretch) that question Obama's right to hold office. Of course that is about .001% of the population. So a tiny minority of people who have no real grasp on reality question Obama's birth certificate.


Maybe he should kill two birds with one stone and take a third oath, only this time he should bring his birth certificate with him.


please, hold your breath for that one.



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 09:00 PM
link   
GENTLE REMINDER

Please be advised that the discussion is about Obama and his status and not each other. Please stop with the sniping and other personal remarks.

Mod Edit: Please Review the Following Link: Courtesy Is Mandatory



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 09:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alxandro
only this time he should bring his birth certificate with him.


once again you ignore the fact that his birth certificate has been checked and is on display.... but then it is not really about his birth certificate, is it!

[edit on 10/1/10 by dereks]



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 09:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by dereks

Originally posted by Alxandro
only this time he should bring his birth certificate with him.


once again you ignore the fact that his birth certificate has been checked and is on display.... but then it is not really about his birth certificate, is it!

[edit on 10/1/10 by dereks]


Checked by whom? Snopes?
Sorry, they are no longer credible because they have an obvious Obama agenda.

Anyway, don't be surprised if Hillary Clinton pulls out Obama's birth certifcate for you someday.



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 09:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alxandro
Checked by whom? Snopes?


No by www.factcheck.org...
also by ": The Associated Press quoted Chiyome Fukino as saying that both she and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama's original birth certificate."


Sorry, they are no longer credible because they have an obvious Obama agenda.


And their obvious Obama agenda is they point out the crap posted by birthers....


Anyway, don't be surprised if Hillary Clinton pulls out Obama's birth certifcate for you someday.


If the one on display was not valid she would alreadyhave done that!



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 09:48 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 10:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bombeni
You are so right about the stupidity being spread around.

You want a revolution to be peaceful .. no guns .. no civil wars ...possibly socialist (your own words from another thread).

Proof that the koolaid is still working.


Bombeni, are you saying you want a violent revolution,
- a "civil" war with guns?

And you are complaining about other people's stupidity?



posted on Jan, 11 2010 @ 12:04 AM
link   
On the actual subject of the OP: Jan, 26, 2010 Obama Going To Trial On His Illegal Alien Status

I wonder, if anyone actually thinks this will force some sort of closure to this inane, moronic, pedantic, theory?

I myself feel that this will just get thrown out as all the other frivolous and ridiculous lawsuits have. Thus, the birthers will struggle on trying to find "the truth
"

But I must say, Birthers should contact their Republican Senators and Republican Representatives and DEMAND they publicly address this issue. Make sure you go out on the campaign trail with your Republican candidates and wave your signs high!



posted on Jan, 11 2010 @ 12:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by dereks

Originally posted by JJay55
See, here's the major thing you are missing. Barakah Hussain Obama was born to a muslim father, that makes him a muslim.


It does not, but why would it matter if he was a muslim? Do you think the POTUS has got to be a Christian?

What if he was a Jew, Hindu, Mormon, Pastafarian etc etc. - does that mean none of them could be POTUS?

snip a rant that has nothing at all to do with topic

Mormons are indeed Christians.
Hence the official name of their church is:
THE CHURCH OF
JESUS CHRIST OF
LATTER DAY SAINTS



posted on Jan, 11 2010 @ 03:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by dereks

Originally posted by JJay55
See, here's the major thing you are missing. Barakah Hussain Obama was born to a muslim father, that makes him a muslim.


It does not, but why would it matter if he was a muslim? Do you think the POTUS has got to be a Christian?

What if he was a Jew, Hindu, Mormon, Pastafarian etc etc. - does that mean none of them could be POTUS?

snip a rant that has nothing at all to do with topic

Understand the implication of a muslim president and Islamic terrorism.
In the eyes of Islam that means that the leader represents the territory and thus we are all subjects of Islam. Now I'm not sure you know what Sharia Law is but it's not really fun and it's not anywhere near the Constitution. Sharia law trumps any other world law, therefore, you might be wearing a burka soon and the males of your family be.ed.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join