www.snopes.com...

The referenced case has already been dismissed by Judge Carter, who concluded his 29 October 2009 order granting the defendants' Motion to Dismiss with the following statement:

"Plaintiffs have encouraged the Court to ignore mandates of the Constitution; to disregard the limits on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a sitting president who was popularly elected by "We the People" — >over sixty-nine million of the people. Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism."

Judge Clay D. Land imposed a $20,000 fine on Dr. Taitz as a sanction for her misconduct in violating the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, noting that:

" When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a
modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a
platform for a political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law."

Originally posted by Polynomial C
reply to post by Bombeni

---

I am not Mexican .. but please .. explain your insult ..

I am really curious ...