It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Revolution-2012
LOL!
I say that all Religious, or lack there of, advertisement should be banned from public locations.
Anyone agree?
noun 1 the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods. 2 a particular system of faith and worship. 3 a pursuit or interest followed with devotion.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by ImaginaryReality1984
And you completely ignore #3.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by ImaginaryReality1984
Warped semantics. But go ahead and define it as you wish. Just don't be suprised when others disagree.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
I have to wonder what motivates them.
Hate?
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Care to back up anything, even one fact in your statement with empirical data?
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
And the idea that most atheists don't know about religion is ludicrous. Many atheists have raed the Bible and the texts from many other religions or at the very least have a decent level of general knowledge on the subject.
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
What do you need me to back up exactly?
The fact that you exist, and you depend on the universe to exist, and that universe gives you life, and that universe was responsible for your creation? Or that people believe all that to be "God"?
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
Reading something, and having knowledge about that something, has NOTHING to do with actually understanding what was read, or what they know.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
I amended my original statement. But in extension, religion is not synomous with belief in the supernatural no matter how much certain other people wish to pretend otherwise and the definition reflects that. But, I love to see the special cases you make for your particular favored belief and the lengths you go to to seperate it from those it finds it's self in conflict with *if you truly had a lack of belief you would not bother to call yourself an atheist, you know joining a group label that does consist of a group of like minds, you would not address the question at all*. It's telling in a way.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
But as I said, believe as you wish. I would imagine you would also argue no blood has been shed in the name of atheism. And that is your right, but I would also argue you sadly mistaken. I call it "abuse of quallifiers" especially in light the qualifiers are used in one special case only.
Originally posted by crowkey
reply to post by ModernAcademia
The same kind of advertising campain was done in london a year or so ago. with adds on the tube and on the sides of buses. Its curious these people call them selves the Big Apple Coalition( i know you call NY the BA] but did not one bad snake tempt Eve with a big juicy apple.
Actually marriage does not have it's roots in religion, it has it's roots in "contracts", meaning a business arrangement for the financial benefit of the families involved.
Well it's not that telling, atheist simply means a lack of belief, i have no belief and therefore i am an atheist. If the label didn't exist i would not invent it, it just happens to be there and is inescapable.
Oh dear if you want to get into that argument we can but lets start by saying that something done by an atheist does not mean it was done in the name of atheism.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
You need to back up that it is god, not that someone believes it. You seem to think that some people believing that the universe is in itself god means that atheists are ignorant and blind because they used clouds on their advert. Not just clouds i know.
GOD
1 capitalized : the supreme or ultimate reality: as a : the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe b Christian Science : the incorporeal divine Principle ruling over all as eternal Spirit : infinite Mind
2 : a being or object believed to have more than natural attributes and powers and to require human worship; specifically : one controlling a particular aspect or part of reality
3 : a person or thing of supreme value
4 : a powerful ruler
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
But that entire string of logic, and i use that word loosely, is that some religious people believe that the universe is itself God.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
Reading something, and having knowledge about that something, has NOTHING to do with actually understanding what was read, or what they know.
So you're saying that they are not allowed to read something and decide for themselves how to interpret it, you are saying that they must read it and see it as you or others do. Wow.
your just lucky we haven't burnt all your churches to ground by now...
Originally posted by endisnighe
reply to post by amazed
Actually marriage does not have it's roots in religion, it has it's roots in "contracts", meaning a business arrangement for the financial benefit of the families involved.
Do not assume too much. You have been indoctrinated well into TPTB view of the world. What you state is pure!!!! ignorance.
Marriage is a union between a man and a woman before the eyes of God. All one has to do is stand before the one you wish to marry and state your intention to God. Or does your government enforce your Marriage! It was never defined as a CONTRACT (again ignorance!) before it was defined by God or did lawyers exist before religion.
Also, I suppose birth certificates existed before baptismal records.
SOMETIMES AAAAAAAAAAAAUUGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!
DENY IGNORANCE AND LOSE YOUR PROGRAMMING
[edit on 10/22/2009 by endisnighe]
Originally posted by endisnighe
reply to post by amazed
Actually marriage does not have it's roots in religion, it has it's roots in "contracts", meaning a business arrangement for the financial benefit of the families involved.
Do not assume too much. You have been indoctrinated well into TPTB view of the world. What you state is pure!!!! ignorance.
Marriage is a union between a man and a woman before the eyes of God. All one has to do is stand before the one you wish to marry and state your intention to God. Or does your government enforce your Marriage! It was never defined as a CONTRACT (again ignorance!) before it was defined by God or did lawyers exist before religion.
Also, I suppose birth certificates existed before baptismal records.
SOMETIMES AAAAAAAAAAAAUUGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!
DENY IGNORANCE AND LOSE YOUR PROGRAMMING
[edit on 10/22/2009 by endisnighe]
History
The way in which a marriage is conducted has changed over time, as has the institution itself. Although the institution of marriage pre-dates reliable recorded history, many cultures have legends concerning the origins of marriage.[19]
One of the oldest known and recorded marriage laws is discerned from Hammurabi's Code, enacted during the Mesopotamian world (widely considered as the cradle of civilization). The legal institution of marriage and its rules and ramifications have changed over time depending on the culture or demographic of the time.[20]
Various cultures have had their own theories on the origin of marriage. One example may lie in a man's need for assurance as to paternity of his children. He might therefore be willing to pay a bride price or provide for a woman in exchange for exclusive sexual access.[21] Legitimacy is the consequence of this transaction rather than its motivation. In Comanche society, married women work harder, lose sexual freedom, and do not seem to obtain any benefit from marriage.[22] But nubile women are a source of jealousy and strife in the tribe, so they are given little choice other than to get married. "In almost all societies, access to women is institutionalized in some way so as to moderate the intensity of this competition."[23]