It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by badmedia
ok, so tell me how a series of chemical reactions creates the ability to observer, understand and be aware? What are these magical chemicals? What is so special about them that they create these things? Absurd IMO.
Who has blind faith now?
If they are consciousness, then they are god. And if it's just random brain waves and chemicals, then how do you get random from a world of action and reaction?
See, we already discussed this. I remember now why I said I was leaving the thread. Chemical reactions and electrical currents just magically produce consciousness?
Tell me, have they identified these things yet? Can you provide any proof that this is true? Or are you just operating on blind faith because you have faith and believe that one day that is what the science will prove?
My flesh is a meat puppet. I am the one that pulls it's strings.
Yawn, where did I claim to be superior?
It's not an assumption. You assume I'm making what I say up. You think I am a liar.
Opposed to assuming the opposite? An assumption is an assumption either way. Assumptions being true is the epitome of arrogance. You just think I'm a liar is all.
Why do you keep assuming it's all warm and fuzzy, it's not. Realizing the truth requires being comforted after. When you realize what the world truly is, and what exactly is and has been going on, it's not all warm and fuzzy. It's quite the opposite.
Well good luck, we are just repeating previous points as I figured before, there is no new discussion going on between us.
Originally posted by badmedia
Ah yes, mock and ridicule. Woohoo, what I fool I am right? I must be a liar or ignorant to have my beliefs right?
Originally posted by TruthParadox
I'm just having fun while making a point.
If Jesus' words were true, then the events in the Bible would not seem extraordinary, because they would be happening all around us.
People would be healing the sick as Jesus commanded.
Originally posted by thrashee
Originally posted by TruthParadox
I'm just having fun while making a point.
If Jesus' words were true, then the events in the Bible would not seem extraordinary, because they would be happening all around us.
People would be healing the sick as Jesus commanded.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. This is not good logic, Truth.
Originally posted by TruthParadox
Ummm...
Jesus says whatever you ask in God's name will come to pass...
Jesus says if you have faith as a mustard seed you can move mountains, walk on water, etc,etc...
In that case, while looking at how our universe would be if such things were true, yes it is evidence.
It is not proof, but it is evidence.
This is how science works. If you expect to see something based on the data, and you don't see it, then that's more evidence that the initial data was wrong (in this case, the Bible).
Originally posted by nj2day
LOL funny you use a famous Atheists words to defend god lol
anyway... where you are mistaken is since you cannot disprove the existence of anything, therefore you must prove the existence...
In the abscens of positive proof, we have nothing to go on but probability....
Weighing the evidence provided for each possible answer will give you your probability... and, as TP has mentioned... it is not 50/50...
We're talking a significant difference in probabilities... We are tossing a coin, and saying its going to land heads or tails... you're insisting that its going to land on its edge...
Originally posted by thrashee
I must have not bothered to read these probabilities...please explain how the probabilities for God are low, again?
Originally posted by nj2day
Its easy! First.. you make a list of all the concrete physical evidence and all the positive hypotheses that support the idea that god exists...
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
The argument put forth isn't good because of the first premise. "Omniscient" usually is understood to mean all-powerful. Why, then, do you say that if God CAN change the future he is not omniscient? A god that can do anything and everything is the god put forth by Judeo-Christian and also Muslim faiths. Please comment.
Originally posted by thrashee
Lol. No, it's not that easy, sorry.
If you logically think about the question of where the universe came from, you wind up with three general possibilities:
1) Some "supernatural" force created it outside of space/time.
2) Some physical cause created the universe.
3) The universe was not created; it always existed.
That's generally it. Now, there are logical issues with EACH of these answers. For instance, option 2 only begs the question of what created THAT thing that created the universe--thus you're lead into infinite regression. Option 3 goes against everything we know empirically from a causal standpoint. And Option 1 interjects some "catch all" to explain everything.
So you see....it's not so simple as rounding up positive evidence.
Science theoretically favors the notion of a mutliverse, but there is absolutely NO empirical evidence for this theory (remember, it's theoretical), and such theories are grossly incomplete and riddled with logical inconsistencies of their own.
Originally posted by TruthParadox
Jesus says if you have faith as a mustard seed you can move mountains, walk on water, etc,etc...
Originally posted by nj2day
Sure it is! that way we don't muddy the water with speculation... only positive confirmed results!
Hrm... than we won't include that in our list... we're only working off solid evidence here...
Yes it is.. you just want to make it more complicated... we're talking about god existing! positive hypotheses are the only ones we can use to prove anything, as we cannot disprove the existence of anything...
String theory is dead... it has been "reborn" so to speak in the form of M-theory... which is on the verge of collapsing completely...
But this isn't a discussion about quantum physics... unless you can prove god's existence with quantum... but even quantum physics is a theory. (I gather you think theories are just "opinions")
Originally posted by nj2day
reply to post by jackflap
Depends on which 10 commandments you follow...
They appear 3 different times, and aren't the same each time...
Exudus 20
Exudus 34
and Deut 5
Although, since the commandments in Ex 34 include blood sacrafice, most people like to pretend they don't exist
16 "And you will take wives from among their daughters for your sons, and their daughters who prostitute themselves to their gods will make your sons also prostitute themselves to their gods."
20 "The firstborn of a donkey you shall redeem with a lamb, or if you will not redeem it you shall break its neck. All the firstborn of your sons you shall redeem.
No one shall appear before me empty-handed."
25 You shall not offer the blood of my sacrifice with leaven, and the sacrifice of the festival of the passover shall not be left until the morning.
those are just a few of the lesser known "commandments"
Originally posted by thrashee
In that case the only thing you can logically state is "you don't know".
That's it. No probabilities, no anything.
Then, again, the only concrete thing you have to say here is "I don't know".
No, I'm not.
Perhaps you're failing to understand the very cosmological argument that fuels science today. Again, if the only thing you rely upon is positive evidence, then you must be content with stating "I don't know". Which means your argument for or against God is exactly the same.
Not hardly. Perhaps you're not understanding me here. I'm not stating there is positive evidence FOR God, I'm stating that there is NO positive evidence to justify ANY of the rational choices regarding the creation of the universe.
Originally posted by jackflap
I never heard this argument but I will look into it. You seem to know a bit about scripture. You would know what the significance of the sacrifice was then? And why it was done?
Originally posted by thrashee
Option 3 goes against everything we know empirically from a causal standpoint.
Originally posted by jackflap
I feel like a Mcdonalds fry cook in an Iron Chef battle.
Originally posted by nj2day
No, There is a long laundry list of assertions the bible makes, and how events transpired that can very much be proven incorrect...
see where probability comes in now?
erm.. this thread is about god... not the big bang, or origins of the cosmos...
If you're here to argue the big bang, or whatever other origin of the universe story, I'm thinkin you hit up the wrong thread...
Erm... we're talking god again... seriously... I think you should start at square 1... and prove the existence of, or determine the probability of the existence of...
and, you're also suggesting that I have to say "I don't know" because I can't DISPROVE god... But i don't... because I can disprove that how god says the universe works... and other scientific oddities in the bible... are in fact, wrong.
therefore, i can successfully claim that the probability of an all knowing, all powerful "god" existing is virtually nil.
But we're not talking the origin of the universe... since we have agreed we can't 100% determine how that came about, than we will not include it in our lists!