It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nj2day
Matthew 10:34
Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.
Revelation 19:13-15
13And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
14And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
15And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.
Matthew 15:1-5
1Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,
2Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.
3But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?
4For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.
So he chews out the pharisees for not upholding the commandment of killing disobedient children?
5But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;
6And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.
7Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,
8This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.
9But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
10And he called the multitude, and said unto them, Hear, and understand:
11Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
12Then came his disciples, and said unto him, Knowest thou that the Pharisees were offended, after they heard this saying?
Originally posted by badmedia
Tell me. What would it be called if someone took a look at science, misunderstood the science and then made claims disproving things based on their understanding, rather than what was really being said?
And what of the person who would base their opinions of Science based only on the misunderstandings of others?
Originally posted by nj2day
exactly the point I'm making... therefore we must deal in probabilities, unless you can conclusively prove a god exists...
No its not... when dealing with probabilities, its important to review all options... and then investigate the evidence to determine the most probable outcomes... Does man create god? or does god create man...
Now we look at why man would create god... vs... why god would create man... stack the probabilities up, and make a decision from there.
your aversion to the scientific method is stunning to say the least. However, investigating the probabilities is not a cop out... instead, decreeing by fiat and than refusing to induct new data into our investigation is a cop out... its the equivilent of saying "because I said so".
Unfortunately, that only works on toddlers, small children, and gullible adults. All others, want a better answer.
Its only christianity we're attacking because that is the basis of your argument... I suppose it wouldn't make much sense if you were talking about judeo-christian gods for us to turn around and reply with an argument based on Thor...
If you talk judeo-christian beliefs, you can expect us to respond in kind.
Originally posted by nj2day
reply to post by crmanager
He's actually pointed out a well known logical paradox presented by christianity...
however, your aversion to him trying to speak to people about it, seems hypocritical in nature if you're a believer. I suppose it would be ok if he was trying to "save" people for jesus huh?
But its not ok for him to point out weaknesses in the dogma of religious faith?
If believers want this sort of stuff to go away... all they have to do is answer the questions non-believers have been asking...
however, they cannot answer in a way that is not circular logic, or false arguments...
You keep going OP... Ignore the bigotry that will come in here... I'll check in and lend a hand if I see the flames are starting to get high lol
Originally posted by badmedia
So, what is your point? Such things have nothing to do with the existence of God.
It all boils down to you having a problem with some religious people and from that you go off on some tirade over dumb things.
Originally posted by badmedia
You purposely ignore the possibility of god because you don't want religious people to be right in anyway, and it's dumb.
Originally posted by badmedia
All you are doing is changing the subject to avoid the points made. I'm just about done with this thread.
Originally posted by badmedia
In this entire thread, has 1 thing been mentioned where someone quoted something Jesus said as bad? Go ahead, I'll wait.
Originally posted by nj2day
LOL I forgot, if it doesn't fit your dogma, the passage is "figurative or symbolic".
Somehow, we're supposed to take some parts figuratively, and some parts literally... who gets to decide these things?
So the crucifixion could have completely been figurative... so could "lord" and "god" to mean something along the lines of a more Deistic god.
Tell me. What would it be called if someone took a look at science, misunderstood the science and then made claims disproving things based on their understanding, rather than what was really being said?
I'd call that the majority. however, science has a nifty way of having the evidence in place, as well as experimental protocol... Even if one didn't understand, they could replicate the experiment's results, thus positively asserting the hypothesis.
And what of the person who would base their opinions of Science based only on the misunderstandings of others?
Gullible lol to say the least... I have more respect for someone who looked for answers and drew the wrong conclusion than someone who didn't bother looking at all...and was told what to believe.
I'm not a fan of Faith, as I'm sure you can tell... but blind faith is worse.
Much of the time, when I see blind faith, I regard that individual with the same regard as I would a cockroach... They aren't overtly harmful, but I wouldn't want them in my house.
Originally posted by TruthParadox
What are you talking about?
You're the one that implied that you need God to be a good person. I was just saying that you don't.
I don't need to believe in God to commit good anymore than I need to believe in Satan to commit evil.
And I believe in neither.
Originally posted by badmedia
No! Not at all!
I do not ignore the possibility of God, I'm instead looking at the probability.
There is not one shred of evidence, so I leave it at this:
The probability of God's existence is no more or less than any other deity or imaginary figure which has or has not been imagined.
Your 'proof' is in your head (as you have said), and you yourself have said that it's not proof to anyone but yourself.
The same is true with any number of religious beliefs - this is not new...
But as far as Christianity is concerned, there are flaws in the belief system which can be pointed out and discussed.
As for the God you believe in, what do you want me to say?
There's no evidence for or against his existence.
I readily admit that!
Would you do the same?
I doubt it.
Originally posted by badmedia
The very nature of proof you ask for is impossible in itself.
There is nothing that would or could ever prove god to you in the way you ask for proof. You could always just dismiss whatever physical evidence that might exist, such as maybe all of creation, as just being something else.
Tell me, what could possibly prove god to you externally?
Quit asking men to prove god to you, and grow a pair of balls and ask god instead. Of course, I know you are scared as hell just because - what if it is true, and then suddenly you might have to answer for somethings. Normal fear, not a comfort. Scary for all, admit it or not.
Probabilities? As for who creates who, it's father and son relationship.
You are technically god, your body/flesh is a temple of god. But you and I are in the son role of the realtionship right now. Where the father role is all knowing, where time does not exist and so on(views the all the movie films stretched out at once), you are in the son role currently. You have a limited perspective and do not know all. In this perspective you see the movie instead of the film.
Understanding this was what changed my life. It's John 14:20 and what Jesus was talking about. This is when you understand you are consciousness and not flesh, and this is when you are born anew.
Sure you can do that. Or maybe you could instead realize who freaking tiny our individual perspectives are in terms of the entire universe.
Even in just in the visible universe at this 1 point in time it's mind boggling. Not to mention our senses only provide a very small % of the universe. So what you are basically saying is - "Anything which has not come across my limited and very small perception of this universe is not true". Sure, it's "practical",
but it's not the truth, and it is a rather arrogant position to take.
I'm a programmer, I create technology. I'm not against science, I am against people who can't see beyond science.
It has it's place. It is great in the realm of action and reaction where it can be repeated 99% of the time. It's what allows for technology and so on. It's very useful and it is dumb to not use it.
However, it has it's limits believe it or not. It is unequipped to deal with consciousness and things that are not based on action and reaction, because it is not repeatable 99% of the time in a lab.
The best it can do is label it as random, and then look for behavior patterns, and brain wave patterns.
Religion and Philosophy operate in the realm of consciousness, reason and understanding and Science in the realm of action and reaction.
Both things need to stay in their proper places, and both are needed. If you can't balance the 2 out, then your technology will doom you, and at the other end of the stick, you'll be stuck in a world of no progress as anyone who goes against the belief of the time is killed.
Yeah, the reason I am no longer an atheist was because I realized how arrogant of a position it was to believe that anything that hasn't come across my reality is by default "probably not there". You're right, I was no longer gullible enough to believe that something came from nothing. And I certainly did want better answers.
Actually, you were the first person in this thread to bring up Christianity.
Originally posted by TruthParadox
To me, it's not about what Jesus said, it's what he didn't say.
You say that the God of the Torah was not really God, as God would not do those evil things.
Don't you find it strange that Jesus comes along and says that the God of the Torah IS his father?
He never once informs the people that their books were wrong and that was not really God.
He linked HIMSELF to that God.
Don't you find that just a little bit strange?
Then you have the terrible laws in Deuteronomy. Jesus himself saws that he did not come to abolish the laws in the Torah.
Why in the friggin' heck wouldn't he CONDEMN those laws if they were false?
That should have been his main message!
It doesn't add up...
Originally posted by badmedia
Tell me, what could possibly prove god to you externally?
Originally posted by badmedia
Quit asking men to prove god to you, and grow a pair of balls and ask god instead.
Originally posted by badmedia
Of course, I know you are scared as hell just because - what if it is true, and then suddenly you might have to answer for somethings. Normal fear, not a comfort. Scary for all, admit it or not.
Originally posted by badmedia
Originally posted by TruthParadox
Because the commandments aren't false. He gives correct understanding of them. The 10 commandments aren't that hard to follow as long as you understand them. It's not like going to church or any of those other traditions of man. Gods laws are the 10 commandments, the rest are man's laws. It's basically loving your neighbor as yourself(treat them as you want to be treated) and love god.
Originally posted by badmedia
Originally posted by TruthParadox
What are you talking about?
You're the one that implied that you need God to be a good person. I was just saying that you don't.
Where?
Originally posted by badmedia
Originally posted by TruthParadox
But you don't need the Bible to live a good life...
No you don't need the bible. It's called a personal relationship with the father.
Originally posted by badmedia
Ok, probability. Are you including the factor where you have an extremely tiny perspective on just the known universe, the point where any of your conclusions based solely on the factors included in that tiny perspective, and thus should at best just plain out admit you have no clue one way or another? Isn't that the more probable conclusion for you at this point?
Originally posted by badmedia
Why wouldn't he? I'm not sure what you are saying. The entire time he was pointing out how the people were not actually doing what the father of the Torah says. He was pointing out their hypocrisy and errors.
Originally posted by nj2day
Actually, if any of the evidence showed any indications...
Prayer and medical patients... no change... (except for one study, which was shown to be flawed in its methods).
I could ask god all day to turn my ice water into wine... wouldn't happen...
An all powerful being could conclusively prove his existence to everyone instantly...
but alas, convieniently, he "doesn't want to"...
I will set an apple on my counter with a video camera... leave it there for 24 hours... Meanwhile I'll contact the clergy, and have them pray endlessly for that apple to turn into pear...
LOL nah, I've been there done that... most Atheists don't start out as atheists... most start out in other religions and move from there...
Decree by fiat... i'm to accept this because you say its true?
Just because that's what you believe, does not make it true. I don't suppose there is the remotest possibility that you are wrong is there?
Sure you can do that. Or maybe you could instead realize who freaking tiny our individual perspectives are in terms of the entire universe.
LOL funny, I always say the same thing... only I'm not afraid to admit that I don't know, or that science doesn't know something... YET...
Apparently, you need answers... you need everything to be absolute and understandable... Which isn't really your fault... its the genetic predisposition again... The unknown can be scary... Guess its easier to think someone with your best interest in mind is in control.
Where did I say that? I've also stated that we know of the existence of things outside of our senses by observing and measuring the interaction it has within the universe. I'm willing to say we don't know everything... but I'm not willing to attribute the unknown to "god".
but it's not the truth, and it is a rather arrogant position to take.
Lets think for a moment exactly how ironic this statement is...
You are telling me that i'm wrong, and your fairy tales are right because you have divine knowledge that I don't have that it is true... then you say questioning your line of reasoning is arrogant?
Sounds like you're arrogantly decreeing by fiat that everything is a certain way "because you say so" or "god told you so".
You hinted at a dislike of "blind faith" in a previous post... now you expect me to employ it...
I'm a programmer, I create technology. I'm not against science, I am against people who can't see beyond science.
Everything is science. Thats what Science is all about... attempting to understand EVERYTHING. What was once thought to be fairy tales has been proven in the past. BUT they didn't start the observations with the assumption that the fairy tale was an undeniable truth.
After all... The platypus was a mythological creature... much like bigfoot... until it was discovered by zoologists. Now its undestood and it's science...
Originally posted by TruthParadox
I don't know if a Purple Cookie Monster of DOOM exists or not, but there's no evidence to support him.
Are you an agnostic where Purple Cookie Monsters are concerned?
I'd be willing to bet that your pretty darn sure that they don't exist...
Originally posted by nj2day
It has it's place. It is great in the realm of action and reaction where it can be repeated 99% of the time. It's what allows for technology and so on. It's very useful and it is dumb to not use it.
Not all science is "useful"... Science is about understanding and observation.. its a "way of thinking"...
Negative... you are applying the same BS to consciousness as before... series of chemical reactions that you are the one adding the importance to it... you refuse to believe that it could really just be that simple...
Anything that you say Science doesn't understand... science will understand eventually. Scientific knowledge is on an exponential growth curve...
Thats all it is... brain waves and chemicals... point blank period. Why must it be so important? If animals are conscious, than I doubt they know "god"
Both are the products of chemical reactions and electrical currents... Thought is nothing but the sum of biological reactions...
Arrogance is assuming that you're special... or that your anything more than a meat puppet
assuming your superior to other life forms.. .being a tree, insect, or mammal,
Assuming a divine being would want to waste their time on what is essentially smaller than a microbe compared to the universe,
automatically assuming that there must be some "purpose" set forth, just for you and your fellow microbes... THAT is the epitome of arrogance...
Its not pretty or "warm and fuzzy"... but, there is only one thing special about each person... and that is the sum of their DNA... and in the grand scheme of things...the DNA of a single individual isn't all that important.
Originally posted by TruthParadox
That is what I'm saying - that I don't know either way.
But that does not make it 50%.
I don't know if a Purple Cookie Monster of DOOM exists or not, but there's no evidence to support him.
Are you an agnostic where Purple Cookie Monsters are concerned?
I'd be willing to bet that your pretty darn sure that they don't exist...
Also, I could use your argument against you.
You also have an extremely tiny perspective of the universe.
Is it not possible that God (assuming he does exist) is actually evil and is trying to trick humanity?
Is it not possible that God is Satan and Satan is God?
Is it not possible that Zeus is God, but he created humans to believe there is a God so that other gods will go after an imaginary God instead of Zeus?
The probability must be the same for each scenario, as there is no evidence for or against any of it.
Yet you do not consider yourself unsure where God is concerned, even given an infinite number possibilities.
You missed my point.
I created a list in a previous post which had a few of the evils of the Bible.
Two of them were God's actions:
* Destroying the first born sons just because the pharaoh was stubborn
* Killing everyone in Noah's flood who was evil, yet forgetting that there must have been countless children and newborns who were innocent
Then you replied and said that was not God.
Don't you see the error?
You believe Jesus, yet Jesus claimed the God who committed these evil acts was his father. He never said "My father never killed the first born just because of the pharaoh". He never set the record straight, so he essentially tied himself to everything that was written about his father.
If what you said was true, then he would have told everyone that the Torah was wrong and was not of God.
He also never told them that the absurd laws in deuteronomy (which was part of their law which they believed was from God) were not from God.
You've said that we are taking the worst parts of the Bible and using it to portray Jesus. But don't you see, he did that himself by tying himself TO the God of the Torah who committed such vial acts...
Originally posted by TruthParadox
lol, true that.
One could even make the argument that we have 'negative evidence' of God's existence, as if he truly existed, people would be performing miracles all around. The extraordinary would be ordinary.
At least the Purple Cookie Monster of DOOM makes no such promises - therefor making him immune to such arguments . Crafty guy...
May his cookie live long and prosper with eternal tastiness.