posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 11:54 PM
Originally posted by Kailassa
Why are you so much more ready to accept the existence of a legal marriage certificate, which you have never seen, than a birth certificate, which you
Hmm, a divorce decree is the alleged piece of information that is to be presented, although, like the stuff that API alleged would be produced, I
doubt it will.
Personally, I doubt Obama's parents ever legally married. His mother was ahead of her times, a wilful girl who I could imagine refusing to go
through the legal formalities.
You may be right, although if the dates are correct, Dunham was married just about the time she would have stated to show her pregnancy. 1961 was not
a good time to be an unmarried pregnant girl in college. Regardless of how forward thinking Dunham was, society wasn't. My own birth mother (about
the same time) was forced to withdraw from (college) classes until after I was born. She was unwed.
Anecdotal, I realize, but an example of the times.
Of course this would make the claims of revealing divorce papers a very silly scam.
And it probably is. But on the slim chance it isn't, there would be a docket # and a judge's signature that could be validated. In fact, what I
don't understand is why they didn't already announce the docket # - anyone could order a copy of the divorce decree with that - it's public record
after this many years.