Originally posted by mbkennel
Originally posted by truthquest
This is definitely the first piece of evidence that has me seriously doubting Obama's birth. The previous stuff simply raised questions, but this
would be really serious evidence that Obama is not a natural-born citizen.
Why, exactly?
From a legal point of view---and that is what matters in a legal matter such as this one---the certification from the authorities in the state of
Hawaii as to the birth is what matters, versus an old document in a civil case.
It is quite reasonable to assume that somebody might have made a mistake in preparing the divorce document, especially given that "Barack Hussein
Obama" is the name of Senator Obama's father as well, and he was born in Kenya.
Anyway, the U.S. Supreme Court has recently looked into and rejected an case regarding the legality of Obama's eligibility for office.
Obama had strong incentive to get Hawaiian government workers to manufacture a birth certificate for him. However, no such strong incentive existed at
the time the divorce papers were written about Obama's birthplace. So, I consider the divorce paper to be far stronger evidence than the state of
Hawaii may have. Furthermore, one of the parties divorce documents have gone missing when they really should not have which took the PI by surprise.
That just adds a question of how they went missing.
The document does not even seem to use the words "Barack Hussein Obama". It says something like "His son, born in Kenya." While it surely could
have been a mistake, there is no reason for me to believe it was a mistake, so I'll take it as true. Someone could have also made a mistake in
issuing Obama a Hawaii birth certificate if he was born in Kenya.
[edit on 31-12-2008 by truthquest]