agreed with the above, but there are some serious limitations to being able to accomplish this with lasers. It can be done, but not by just anyone.

Look at the Easter Island writing on the previous page. Take note of the last one posted. It is zoomed in, and it looks like a snake. Now scroll down and look at the still frames. Go down ten rows and over three. They look the same

greeneyedleo, sorry mate - it is possible, youre right, but then, these witnesses would have some explaining to do & *for now* im prepared to take the witnesses accounts as being credible.

interesting that it seems that if the seperate symbol images are overlayed upon one another (as shown on another forum just now) it could be considered that there is some kind of continuation in the stroke or lines of the symbols as if it were in fact they all are just one large "squiggle" - not that this proves or disproves any ufo or kid in the field......

If you look at the whole video its pretty obvious after you see how fast and steady the zooming action is at around 3:25 and 7:30 to point out just two even though the object is supposed far away high up in the sky that he is actually filming a simple animated object maybe from / on a large tv-screen. Theres also interesting couple seconds at around 7:45-7:50 where you can actually see the slideshow effect to disappear for a second or two from the streaking "ufo".

The audio track has been obviously edited on to the film at a different time as the whole film has been most likely been taken inside or at someones house from their tv-monitor. I dont know what the bowl shape is as its so out of focus theres no way to make it out. It could be anything, but its pretty obvious the bowl and the mystical thread flying around the "sky" are two different clips edited together.

Just my two cents.

[edit on 4/3/08 by Gonjo]

a good point about the need to have an object to reflect off of...that's why you have the smoke machines in the night club with the lasers.....so....let's ask this question.....

What was the weather conditions on the night of the filming? was it cloudy? Was it clear? What was the actual date of the filming? should be pretty easy to look up.

Originally posted by GonjoThe audio track has been obviously edited on to the film at a different time as the whole film has been most likely been taken inside or at someones house from their tv-monitor. I dont know what the bowl shape is as its so out of focus theres no way to make it out. It could be anything, but its pretty obvious the bowl and the mystical thread flying around the "sky" are two different clips edited together.

Just my two cents.

[edit on 4/3/08 by Gonjo]

you seem so convinced with what youre saying - the audio track has been obviously edited on to the film afterwards? how is it so obvious to you? pls explain.... i'd love to know, i feel im missing something here.

I've often wondered if the crop circles and now this luminescent flashing of symbols are someone's way of saying to the Earth, "Mene, mene, tekel, upharsin". But we've lost the language and the dictionary with time so all we can manage in response is some form of "Ooh. Aah." or "That's a damned fake it is..."

[edit on 4/3/08 by Pellevoisin]

To me it looks like the writing was on angle. I wish we could get footage from another location so we could see which way the writing (if it can be said to be writing) was directed. Some of the shapes posted in the collection of stills certainly looks like images on an angle.

I am pretty sure the UFO hunters discounted a balloon as the entire balloon would light up when hit by the laser. And that video certainly rules out a reflective non transparent finish due to the changes and angles in play.

Edit: it would be very interesting if my above theory is right on the angle of the writing to work out which place it was meant to be seen best from.

[edit on 4-3-2008 by Shere Khaan]

Originally posted by Pellevoisin
I've often wondered if the crop circles and now this luminescent flashing of symbols are someone's way of saying to the Earth, "Mene, mene, tekel, upharsin". But we've lost the language and the dictionary with time so all we can manage in response is some form of "Ooh. Aah." or "That's a damned fake it is..."

[edit on 4/3/08 by Pellevoisin]

Kudos on that email skip!
If real wonderful..if not..Shortshrift will be made of it for sure..

That is most interesting Pelle ..what is the translation of that.? It has a nice sound..
anyway as long as it doesnt translate to convert or die..I will be quite happy..
I am anxious on the video analysis..Gorg raises some questions..I hope these witnesses are accessible to answer..can zoom in zoom out be controlled remotely? just curious..

[edit on 4-3-2008 by Sys_Config]

Apart from the convenient sound track, I was worried about the zooms. Something about them tells me they are afterFX. I haven't even figured how to download the video to my drive yet, but maybe someone who has can comment. If these zooms were made at the time of capture the resolution of the Zooming frames would remain constant. If these zooms were performed digitally during a later editing phase, would the zoomed images exhibit a decrease in resolution? In other words, the pixellation of the long shots is enlarged by digital zooming. I guess there will be some algorythmic treatment of the enlarging process which would be identifiable to those who know what to look for. Make any sense?

WG3

[edit on 4-3-2008 by waveguide3]