It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Really people, as an American, I find this jumping at shadows mentality to be symptomatic of a national neurosis. America could learn so much from the Aqua Teens. If only they'd listen. Also they could learn a lot about LEDs here, if they'd only listen. But why are news people paid to make us scared, and not smart?
Originally posted by jsobecky
It's a package on a bridge abutment 20 feet above eye level, and you're telling me that you would immediately recognize it as harmless? No way, pal. I would not trust your judgement as gospel if I were in charge of protecting the public.
Let me say this: I've forgotten more about electronics than you will ever know. Want to call me out on that? Whenever you're ready, just yell.
That's a stupid and irresponsible statement, as well as an ignorant denial of the stress that it causd to a major city. Go watch cartoons, that's where your head is.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Originally posted by jsobecky
It's a package on a bridge abutment 20 feet above eye level, and you're telling me that you would immediately recognize it as harmless? No way, pal. I would not trust your judgement as gospel if I were in charge of protecting the public.
It's not a package, it's a flat board with a "payload" of batteries. Do you do any bird watching? Field specs might prevent a panic.
I'm not saying there shouldn't be a fine, but these people who want vengeance and for heads to roll are very sad people. This was not a big deal, and it was clearly a cartoon character. The responders are the ones at fault. They were all incompetnt in regards to A: electronics, and B: pop culture, and I as a citizen find that unacceptable.
That stress is designed, didn't you know? The fear in America is designed, and the people of Boston (for example) have been disarmed and ramped up in fear for a reason. I think this thread could really do some good in that regard. But point is: The result of this little nothingness of a stunt, is maybe 80% due to the inept responders and authorities. I'd say 20% due to the stupidity of the people who didn't label the devices clearly with an 800 number or some kind of way to tell a bomb guy "Hey idiot, there's nothing to explode here!"
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Okay Shots you got me. I underestimated the impact time of day would have on the shows popularity. Nevertheless, the point still stands. Remind me again Shots, what was the point again?
Anyway, the only way these guys can be prosicuted is if they can prove that they intended to produce a bomb scare. If the defense show that these advertisers intended to make this an advertisement, and not a bomb scare, then they'll be fine. The judge is even pretty nonchalant about the whole thing too, so they're likely to get off light.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
some kind of way to tell a bomb guy "Hey idiot, there's nothing to explode here!"
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Originally posted by smallpeeps
some kind of way to tell a bomb guy "Hey idiot, there's nothing to explode here!"
That's a great idea! If everyone would just label all their baggage with a sticker saying "Not a Bomb" before going to an airport, we could fire all the security guards and save a lot of money! Good thinking! :shk:
Originally posted by jsobecky
Not necesarrily. Intent is only one component to consider. Consequences wield at least as much weight.
Example: Tuesday night, a guy drove his pickup the wrong way on I495. He struck a couple vehicles, causing severe injuries but thankfully no deaths.
He never intended to hurt others, but the consequences of his actions proved otherwise.
What do you think he will do jail time for, his intent or his consequences?
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Okay Shots you got me. I underestimated the impact time of day would have on the shows popularity. Nevertheless, the point still stands. Remind me again Shots, what was the point again?
Anyway, the only way these guys can be prosicuted is if they can prove that they intended to produce a bomb scare. If the defense show that these advertisers intended to make this an advertisement, and not a bomb scare, then they'll be fine. The judge is even pretty nonchalant about the whole thing too, so they're likely to get off light.
Not necesarrily. Intent is only one component to consider. Consequences wield at least as much weight.
Example: Tuesday night, a guy drove his pickup the wrong way on I495. He struck a couple vehicles, causing severe injuries but thankfully no deaths.
He never intended to hurt others, but the consequences of his actions proved otherwise.
What do you think he will do jail time for, his intent or his consequences?
The General Laws of Massachusetts
Section 102A1/2. (a) Whoever possesses, transports, uses or places or causes another to knowingly or unknowingly possess, transport, use or place any hoax device or hoax substance with the intent to cause anxiety, unrest, fear or personal discomfort to any person or group of persons shall be punished by imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than two and one-half years or by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than five years or by a fine of not more than $5,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
(b) For the purposes of this section, the term “hoax device” shall mean any device that would cause a person reasonably to believe that such device is an infernal machine. For the purposes of this section, the term “infernal machine” shall mean any device for endangering life or doing unusual damage to property, or both, by fire or explosion, whether or not contrived to ignite or explode automatically. For the purposes of this section, the words “hoax substance” shall mean any substance that would cause a person reasonably to believe that such substance is a harmful chemical or biological agent, a poison, a harmful radioactive substance or any other substance for causing serious bodily injury, endangering life or doing unusual damage to property, or both.
(c) This section shall not apply to any law enforcement or public safety officer acting in the lawful discharge of official duties.
(d) The court shall, after a conviction, conduct a hearing to ascertain the extent of costs incurred, damages and financial loss suffered by local, county or state public safety agencies and the amount of property damage caused as a result of the violation of this section. A person found guilty of violating this section shall, in all cases, upon conviction, in addition to any other punishment, be ordered to make restitution to the local, county or state government for any costs incurred, damages and financial loss sustained as a result of the commission of the offense. Restitution shall be imposed in addition to incarceration or fine; however, the court shall consider the defendant’s present and future ability to pay in its determinations regarding a fine. In determining the amount, time and method of payment of restitution, the court shall consider the financial resources of the defendant and the burden restitution will impose on the defendant.
Originally posted by MRGERBIK
Hell, if I was the film distribution company I'd move up the date a bit because of this incident. And I'd clown every single one of you in the trailor. You know why? Because you will get outraged and complain some more. Wake up seriously... Some of you don't understand how P.R. works. P.T. Barnum owns you.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
The two that were arrested have been charged with "placing a hoax device" so far (the serious charge that is). It does appear that, under Massachusetts law, the state would have to show intent to get a conviction on that law. Here's the actual text of the law:
The General Laws of Massachusetts
Section 102A1/2. (a) Whoever possesses, transports, uses or places or causes another to knowingly or unknowingly possess, transport, use or place any hoax device or hoax substance with the intent to cause anxiety, unrest, fear or personal discomfort to any person or group of persons shall be punished by imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than two and one-half years or by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than five years or by a fine of not more than $5,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Originally posted by MRGERBIK
I don't even need to say anything. But they are selling these on EBAY. Do you think you can stop ebay from selling bomb threat hoax shirts? I'd like to see that one. I think what just happened is all of the people who pushed this story out there who were angered, just got their ass handed to them bruised and dented. Welcome to getting pimpslapped......again
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
People over-reacted, as usual.
Do these same folks tuck and roll out of the car everytime a light blinks on the dashboard?
Do they crawl on their belly past the toaster in their kitchen in case it contains C4?
If people had used an ounce of common sense, they would have realized terrorists don't go out of their way to advertise the location of their bombs by installing flashing Lite-Brite signs above them.
Everyone in this situation got exactly what they deserved. The terror-stricken fools among us got freaked out for a while, maybe ruined perfectly good underwear in the process, and the rest of us got a good hearty gut laugh, which no doubt prolonged our life measurably.
Hell, I'm still laughin' at the thought of a bomb squad crouching behind a bunch of barriers, sweating bullets, preparing to blow the crap out of a child's toy that's been flipping them off for forty minutes.
The only thing that's not funny about this farce is the amount of public money spent reinforcing the irrational fear of the citizenry. :shk:
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Do these same folks tuck and roll out of the car everytime a light blinks on the dashboard?
Do they crawl on their belly past the toaster in their kitchen in case it contains C4?