It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jsobecky
"I have a right to be mad!". The problem is that that inevitably leads to a lack of accountability for one's actions, ...
But the above quote brings up one more example of Black Privilege - the immunity from responsibility.
We have even seen an example of that, to a lesser degree, here on ATS.
Originally posted by ceci2006
The post above does show "immunity from responsibility" very well. For once, jsobecky and myself agree.
But don't forget--"immunity from responsibility" is an equal opportunity thing. White people aren't removed from being irresponsible. But because of it, they hardly get their wrists slapped.
Just think what happened with the "racial profiling" business with Muslim individuals.
A lot of "wrist slapping" occurred there due to white privilege. And then, it gets into a murkier slope when you think about the treatment of victims incarcerated in Gitmo. In fact, our President is trying to pass amendments in order to have government officials recieve "immunity from responsibility" from torture.
Originally posted by HarlemHottie
People wanted to more or less say "I have a right to be mad!".
JSO, I need to correct you. The only black posters in this thread, as far as I know, are me and Ceci. The only response I made to your post was to let you know that there are lots of white people in Harlem. In fact, in reference to 'white guilt', I said that I don't think being angry at modern white people, or holding them accountable, for the "sins of the father" is an effective strategy in improving race relations.
I don't want this to be a 'thing,' I just needed to clarify that.
And about the Black privilege--why shouldn't our rage be legitimized? The things during Slavery, Jim Crow and the Civil Rights Era were pretty terrible if you think about it. Should African-Americans be rather happy and sing about it instead?
Do you want us to let it slide for the sake of "not feeling anything about it" and letting the lynchers and other intimidators off the hook? Especially if some of them are still alive?
That's why there is a legitimate right to feel rage. And that rage is not directed at people, per se. It is toward the system for not doing the things that they should in righting the wrongs of unjustness.
And imagine how infuriated you might be if there were another group of people arguing against that social justice by calling it derogatory names: "quotas", "social handouts", "nonsense" and of course, my favorite, "it doesn't exist".
Originally quoted by galloping horders
Ceci as I expected from your previous posts I have read and noted your; dare I say; personal attack on me.
Yes, as a matter of fact the person who was promoted had a far lesser score then I but was a woman of color.
Once again you have diverted from the question; so I will attempt to clarify and reask. Is it fair that the individual I was referring received no absolutely no disciplinary action while a white man who cursed in front of another woman was in fact disciplined and lost pay for 6 months; how is this fair treatment? What twisted mind can even begin to concieve that it is just?
I regret that from the tone of your posts in this thread you seem to be one of the most bigoted people I've run across in years.
[I]originally posted by ceci2006[/I]
I'm sorry you feel that way. I am a tough debator. I can be gentle when I want. But hard issues deserve hard language. And politeness, diplomacy and kindness does not work in this thread.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by jsobecky
The major question I have is, why?
One thing about NWO and screwing with groups of people is that it can shift demographics. With shifting demographics and proper investments people can get wealthy fast. If it exists ...
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by FlyersFan
One thing about NWO and screwing with groups of people is that it can shift demographics. With shifting demographics and proper investments people can get wealthy fast. If it exists ...
I don't want to dwell on this topic here, but I hear arguments such as exploitation and oppression around this. I just want you to consider:
Originally posted by ceci2006
On this thread, we will keep civil about this issue. We will also deal with this subject matter honestly. No personal attacks or insults will be entertained.
Originally posted by ceci2006
And I don't give a damn how you hijacked this thread.
And you just ruin things in a thread like a cancer.
And you bring others that make the cancer more virulent.
Originally posted by ceci2006
I shrug and move on.
I feel I ought to graciously take a true hiatus from the thread.
Originally posted by jsobecky
People wanted to more or less say "I have a right to be mad!".
The responses I was referring to were from ceci.
More troubling, however, is an accusation that is untrue, but has continually been bandied about here: the notion that "it doesn't exist". Not a single example of that can be produced here, even though it's been asked for.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Lumping Gitmo and Bush into the discussion only serves to derail the topic...
... and makes people who are against Gitmo or Bush, but may be against your stand on racism in general, somehow think that you are kindred spirits.
Originally posted by HarlemHottie
Originally posted by jsobecky
People wanted to more or less say "I have a right to be mad!".
The responses I was referring to were from ceci.
I know. That's why I felt it was neccesary to say anything at all. "People" is a plural form. If you only meant Ceci, you should have said that. To people who don't want to read the whole thread, it looks like I agreed with her. I have been lumped together with other members of my race. What does that sound like?
More troubling, however, is an accusation that is untrue, but has continually been bandied about here: the notion that "it doesn't exist". Not a single example of that can be produced here, even though it's been asked for.
When one person cries whatever -ism, and another person responds with accusations of personal irresponsibility, the implication is that the second person is denying the effects of the -ism in question.
So, in talking about racism, it looks like that second person is a 'denier.'
Please correct me. I would like to be wrong.
Originally posted by jsobecky
And I used the correct form, because there were more responses to it than just you and ceci.
People wanted to more or less say "I have a right to be mad!".
I suppose you (figurative you) could interpret it that way. But there are other interpretations...For example, donwhite posted about a black man who made a lot of bad personal decisions.
I hope I have convinced you that I am not a racist...
Originally posted by ceci2006
But how many people will really learn how to see past their narrow definitions?
I'm still rethinking everything that has been said in the thread. And now, I think I'm learning to lessen my frustration and starting to think about what could be that middle ground.
Hey, HH, I said before many times that all of us do not think alike. I wouldn't want all Black people to be in lock-step.
I still respect and admire your words and inferences even though we have a difference in agreement. And you do have a lot of courage to continue to speak with such reconciliatory gentleness in your voice.
So I respect your position.
Since there are some whites who are angry about affirmative action, could one say that they are also angry at the system as well?
So why is their anger deemed legitimate and ours (if we are incensed) reflected as "personal irresponsibility"?
Politicians make decisions every day that are "out of our control". Why is it so hard to understand that there are laws, politics and social ettiquette that do the same thing?
a friend of mine told me he counted the times he had to express himself about a certain issue concerning Black folk to his white co-workers more than 20 times before they got it. And even to that point, some still didn't get it. So, I still think that there has to be an effective way of "telling it like it is" so that people from both sides can start finally getting it.
Originally quoted by HarlemHottie
Well, I had quite a turn-around on the last page, so maybe other people are learning something here. This is a good discussion. Thanks for starting it.
Good, I'm glad. That's really the best any of us can hope for, a middle ground. You can't expect everyone to agree 100% on anything.
Yeah, there is a wide spectrum of "black thought" on a lot of controversial subjects, like homosexuality, for example.
Thank you, Ceci. You know that means a lot to me.
That's what I think this whole conversation is about. Respect. You don't have to agree with some to maybe see where they're coming from.
That is an excellent point. I think I'll add that to my working theory on the "Global Elite" and their devisive use of racism. I'll give you some credit.
I think that's due, not to the average white wo/man, but to those framing the argument in the media. They just happen, a lot of the time, to be white. I also suspect that, unfortunately, blacks are expendable in the Grand Plan. I think the Elite would prefer that, whichever of the population they 'save,' to serve them, be white. [There's a joke about why traditional science fiction never has any black people. Because white people don't see us in their future.]
It doesn't really matter what color the slave is, as long as they work. And if all they want regular people for is slavery, they can keep it. I don't feel hurt.
You're right. I think that the average American always thought their government worked in their best interests (except for the fringe conspiracy theorists, like us, lol). It's just recently that people are seeing through the System. I think that this 'era' is the best time to have this discussion.
Haha. Your friend's story is real. But, seriously, I think that's the result of stereotypes and assumptions, on both sides. This issue of racism in America has been going on so long that both sides think they know the other side's argument, like a married couple on the edge of a divorce.
Originally posted by HarlemHottie
I agree that the guy in the example had made a lot of bad choices. I haven't made any of them, but racism still adversely affects my life. Does that change your mind?
Originally posted by jsobecky
Well, it was not my conscious intention to lump all blacks together. Did I subconsciously imply that you agreed with every other black member? Obviously I did. Mea culpa.