It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dr LoveI guess you could theoretically travel the speed of light in one of those things and never even feel it. Freaky stuff!
Originally posted by jbondo
Didn't he say that you are actually pulling your destination to you via the bending of space? That would explain the "warp" in warp drive.
Originally posted by Astyanax
If this were the case, light wouldn't reflect off it and no-one would be able to see it.
Originally posted by Astyanax
It's acceleration we feel, not constant motion in a straight line.
"We are beginning an experiment at Berkeley to detect tachyon-like quasiparticles. There are strong scientific reasons to believe that such quasiparticles really exist, because Maxwell's equations, when coupled to inverted atomic media, lead inexorably to tachyon-like solutions.
"Quantum optical effects can produce a different kind of 'faster than light' effect (see "Faster than light?" by R. Y. Chiao, P. G. Kwiat, and A. M. Steinberg in Scientific American, August 1993). There are actually two different kinds of 'faster-than-light' effects that we have found in quantum optics experiments. (The tachyon-like quasiparticle in inverted media described above is yet a third kind of faster-than-light effect.)
Originally posted by Astyanax
It would disappear from Zeta Reticuli wossname with a pop and reappear in Earth's atmosphere with another pop. No visible motion in between.
Originally posted by zorgon
Do a google search on electro-gravitics.... there is lots of data, as far back as Herman Oberth in his books Die Rakete zu den Planetenräumen (By Rocket into Planetary Space).
It seems 'electrogravitics' is a general term applied to 'anti-gravity' devices... Anywho, it's clear to see they just employ electrostatics to essentially repel a charged object from a high tension supply of some description.
Yes, and in fact, the same company that came up with this concept also
developed a shock-free bullet for the army two or three decades ago.
Handy for snipers, who don't want their targets to know that they're
being shot at if they miss.
It was basically a converging/diverging nozzle, rifled for spin
stability. The trick was to get the proper contour and throat sizing
so that it didn't choke.
Originally posted by zorgon
It is possible to conceive of space having more dimensions than three...but it's still the same space.
Yes its called hyperspace and it involves time, and no its not the same space.
Other dimensions are not other places. That idea is pseudoscientific twaddle, fit only for comic books..
REALLY? I see then perhaps you might want to tell that to Harvard Physicists? I am sure they would appreciate your input!!
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Astyanax
It's acceleration we feel, not constant motion in a straight line.
Quite true, but I don't quite agree that nothing goes faster than light...
What is known about tachyons, theoretical particles that travel faster than light and move backward in time?
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Astyanax
If this were the case, light wouldn't reflect off it and no-one would be able to see it.
Yes precisely, IF it was a perfect system with no "leaks"...
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Astyanax
It would disappear from Zeta Reticuli wossname with a pop and reappear in Earth's atmosphere with another pop. No visible motion in between.
Good way to show this is a simple piece of paper... you would step in one side and out the other....instantaneously.
Originally posted by zorgon
Quite true, but I don't quite agree that nothing goes faster than light...
Counteracting magnetic field
A vessel travelling on the surface or under water gives rise to detectable local disturbances in the Earth's magnetic field. This can be avoided by demagnetising the vessel by generating a counteracting magnetic field.
The Bright Star is a private venture of Lockheed Martin Skunk Works. It is a Mach 2+ supersonic cruise/sonic boom research aircraft, which was used by the Skunk Works to raise DARPA's interest in QSP (Quiet Supersonic Platform) research. Although it is not a DOD project, the USAF provides some support (at least by providing a secret flight test location ;-)). The Bright Star has been flying for many years, and was the cause of some of the unexplained sonic booms over the western USA. The Bright Star is the most plausible cause for many so-called "Aurora" sightings.
Bright Star is said to be the cause for the famous "Donuts-On-A-Rope" contrails (for photos, see this page), often reported together with a "rumbling" sound. The rumbling is generated by the vehicle in the transoinc speed region, and is essentially a series of low-amplitude sonic booms at a frequency of 1 to 3 Hz. The "donut" contrail is formed by water vapor captured in the shock wave. The "pulsating" sonic boom is directly responsible for both the characteristic sound of the aircraft, and the "strange-looking"contrails.
We could say that if Oberth is now recognized as a father for rocketry and astronautics he should be lauded as a midwife for electric propulsion. We say so because Oberth’s major contribution, as far as EP is concerned, was not in having developed specific inventions, or having undertaken technically rich conceptualizations, but rather in having defined, for the first time publicly
and unambiguously, EP as a serious and worthy pursuit in astronautics.
Originally posted by Allred5923
If this thread is heading to where I do belive it is "Going" you will se me here often and in full regalia for the effort's of the concept." Nuf-said.
I hope that Matyas is alright, and from the recent information I have been privy too, "This thread is going beyond the pervrbial 'Box' and it is too bad he is not here to reinterrate his thought's.
You want to know what is faster than the speed of light?
Originally posted by Lecter
If a UFO accelerates and vanishes almost instantly out of sight wouldnt there be a sonic boom from such acceleration?
Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Is it aether or air ?
So when I post my ideas, even though someone is looking for answers, I can be wrong.
Its all a wild guess, sorry for introducing numbers.