It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sdrumrunner
Originally posted by Jedi_Master
Originally posted by sdrumrunner
Regarding the decision to take a scientific calculator (a valuable tool in the aforementioned disciplines, BTW), remember that the events in this story supposedly occurred only five years removed from successfully sending man to the moon... and retunring him alive. And considering the SR-71 -- a rather complicated feat of aeronautical engineering -- first flew in 1964, I think they could probably have handled the successful roll-out of a calculator.
Lastly, the figure was amended to 45.25 tons, more than enough to allow for several scientific calculators (as well as a slide rule, an abacus, and a whole lot of pencils and paper!).
I guess you're missing my point entirely...
You are taking a peice of equipment, newly invented ( actually the true scientific calc' was introduced in January of 1965), on a mission far away from any tech support or spare parts ( be one heck of a long distance call to Tech support if anything went wrong with it ), to do something you can already do with the slide rules and charts...
I apologize if I missed your point. Please allow me to appraoch what I said from a different angle:
The "scientific calculator" predates the alleged departure date. Sumlock Comptometer of England launched the ANITA in 1962, and Sharp introduced the Compet (CS-10A) in 1964.
Furthermore, while Wang Laboratories may have introduced the WANG 300 in 1965, Dr. Wang was awarded patent #2,708,722 in 1955 for his "Pulse Transfer Controlling Device," a patent he originally filed for in 1949 (source).
I imagine that to assume the US Military complex was using the same off-the-shelf computational technology as Joe Public in 1964 would be as erroneous as assumming we have, at any given time, access to the same raw computational power as the NSA.
Given the technology was under development for some time before the alleged Serpo mission launch date in 1964, it is very reasonable to assume that the scientific calculator did not represent an untested device. I guess the analogy to the SR-71 was lost in transcription -- If the SR-71 was capable of making a successful first flight in 1964, do you not think the US Military complex had access to fully functional, tested calculators?
And given the report is supposed to contain "literally hundreds of pages of scientific calculations," I strongly disagree with your assertion that a scientific calculator would have been of little or no value.
5) They also took electric razors, coffee pots, electric heaters, a DIM (no explanation as to what this was), an electric IBM typewriter, a scientific calculator, slide rules (both conventional and scientific), Base Data Collection Recorder (BDCR), three different sized telescopes, tangents, both conventional and electrical.
The list goes on and on. But they took about everything they were allowed to take, as to weight. The Ebens did weigh the equipment taken by our team. The weight limit was 4.5 tons or 9,000 lbs. As for food, the team took C-Rations, military style. They carefully planned for 10 years.
And you're going somewhere where you may not/can not get parts to repair. And they're going there for 10 yrs, so wouldn't you discard this item for something you can use like the microscope...
Originally posted by torbjon
Jedi_Master:
I touched upon the subject of the choice of equipment the team took with them some pages back.
The calculator, the Electric typewriter (as opposed to a manual one), the telescope and tangent ( “…three different sized telescopes, tangents, both conventional and electrical.” What is an electric tangent, by the way?) and the choice of food stocks ( C-Rations as opposed to “covered wagon” style food stuffs—ie flour, sugar, rice, lard, dried fruit, jerked meat, etc. etc.)
My angle for the questions (and doubt) was my own experience in Alaskan bush country. I’ve BEEN isolated for ten years in the middle of nowhere (heck, the first Gulf War came and went and we never even knew our country had gone to war *rolls eyes*)
We were also on an island; everything had to be shipped in, all our seafood products had to be shipped out, so I’m rather picky about the weights of things. Every little tiny bit really and truly does add up.
Cans rust, (and they are bulky, that’s a LOT of weight wasted in just cans for the C-Rations… thousands of pounds and many cubic feet of space went just for CANS)
Electronic components get gummed up, replacement parts are difficult if not impossible to fabricate in the field… manual tools that can be repaired with other manual tools and a variety of food stocks are the key to survival in an isolated environment.
The issue has been touched upon, but has yet to be adequately resolved for me. I have serious doubts about the list of goodies that they took with them.
Again, I am not coming at this from a modern armchair perspective, but as someone who has actually lived in the Last Frontier for ten years…. we HAD access to the world at large and none of my Alaskan comrades would be caught dead with most of the gear they took.
They were going to the Final Frontier and, for whatever reason, chose to take a bunch of really crazy stuff.
But...I'm a skecptic...so my opinion here is mute...
Originally posted by Shawnna
But...I'm a skecptic...so my opinion here is mute...
Skeptics are abundant here...... those with closed minds are not.
Originally posted by Jedi_Master
No I'm sorry my friend, but those calc's were only 4 function with some maybe a square root function...
So If it were me I wouldn't take it due to I wouldn't need it, before they had calc's all they had were slide rules and charts...
Remember these scientist were taught math when there were NO calc's, they relied on their slide rules and charts, so why would they take something with them that they could already do with their slide rules, and was relatively new.
And you're going somewhere where you may not/can not get parts to repair. And they're going there for 10 yrs, so wouldn't you discard this item for something you can use like the microscope...
Originally posted by sdrumrunner
Originally posted by Jedi_Master
No I'm sorry my friend, but those calc's were only 4 function with some maybe a square root function...
First, let us not undervalue the sqaure root function. Second, the Friden EC130, which was introduced in 1964 after a 2-3 year development lifecycle, "pioneered the use of Reverse Polish Notation (RPN), a method of entering math problems using a multi-register stack. RPN logic made complex calculations easier to perform without having to write down intermediate results and re-enter them into the calculator when needed."
This would indeed assist in performance of the complex mathematical calculations required in the study of astrophysics, aeronautics, and nuclear science.
So If it were me I wouldn't take it due to I wouldn't need it, before they had calc's all they had were slide rules and charts...
And before electricity, we all used kerosene and candles. But I still pack a flashlight when I travel, even if I don't even bring an extra bulb.
However, just because you personally may not have chosen to bring a scientific calculator does not in any way invalidate the story because the team supposedly included one among the 45+ tons of cargo they brought.
Remember these scientist were taught math when there were NO calc's, they relied on their slide rules and charts, so why would they take something with them that they could already do with their slide rules, and was relatively new.
I happen to posess a degree in mathematics, and while earning my degree learned to factor *very* large numbers (i.e., test them for primality) without the use of a calculator. However, given the option, I would happily choose to use my laptop and whatever s/w tools I have at my disposal (e.g., Mathematica, Matlab, etc.) to accomplish the same task with less effort and time.
And you're going somewhere where you may not/can not get parts to repair. And they're going there for 10 yrs, so wouldn't you discard this item for something you can use like the microscope...
This matters little, as I doubt they were able to obtain replacement parts for anything on Serpo. So, by your logic, since they could not source replacement parts (e.g., bushings, transistors, batteries, etc.) for their equipment, does that mean they didn't bring any?
If you reference the above link, you will in fact see the EC130 was made of various components which could, in fact, be replaced. I do not agree that the possibility the team included replacement parts among the 45+ tons of cargo would in any way invalidate the story...
Lastly, as I mentioned, the team only included two scientists, and it is quite reasonable that in assembling the team, biologists may very well have been overlooked in favor of astrophysicists or nuclear scientists. However, as the team did include two doctors, I do find it odd that the cargo did not include a scientific microscope. Is there some significant difference between a microscope and a "scientific microscope?" Or is this simply a product of 1960's vernacular?
I do find it odd that the cargo did not include a scientific microscope. Is there some significant difference between a microscope and a "scientific microscope?" Or is this simply a product of 1960's vernacular?
Originally posted by Jedi_Master
I see you are young...
I'm an old man of 42 and I've worked on equipment of that era
5) They also took electric razors, coffee pots, electric heaters, a DIM (no explanation as to what this was), an electric IBM typewriter, a scientific calculator, slide rules (both conventional and scientific), Base Data Collection Recorder (BDCR), three different sized telescopes, tangents, both conventional and electrical.
Originally posted by sdrumrunner
Originally posted by Jedi_Master
I see you are young...
I'm an old man of 42 and I've worked on equipment of that era
So let's assume you did the straight-through-school routine, and graduated with a degree in EE or ME by the age of 22, which would have been 1985, and directly enterred the workforce. May I kindly ask in what capacity you were working on a 21-year old, obsolete, front-line scientific calculator from 1964?
BTW, I was a sophmore in high school in 1985, and I do not recall seeing many 21-year old scientific calculators in service anywhere... As I recall (first hand, mind you), the technology had advanced significantly by then.
Anyway, I apologize for the digression, and pledge not to further distract from the topic of this thread by entertaining anymore discussion about the intrinsic scientific value of a scientific calculator in 1964, five years before I was born and when you were but a year old!
While individually some of us may not concur with the team's reported choice of equipment, this alone does not in any way invalidate the Serpo story.
Originally posted by simon_alex0327
5) They also took electric razors, coffee pots, electric heaters, a DIM (no explanation as to what this was), an electric IBM typewriter, a scientific calculator, slide rules (both conventional and scientific), Base Data Collection Recorder (BDCR), three different sized telescopes, tangents, both conventional and electrical.
What is a tangent?? Either electrical or conventional??
I am intrigued too.
Anyone have any ideas??
I have searched online and cannot find anything.
Originally posted by torjbon
huh? a tangent is a concept, not a thing, unless they were referring to a tangent galvanometer… why a galvanometer? and why two kinds?
since it’s listed right after telescopes, maybe they meant “sextant”.
more huh?
an electrical sextant? what is That and how does it work??