It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Centrist
Name withheld
Recently a new kind of marketing scheme has hit the internet, companies and individuals create websites that make amazing claims, such as these:
divethedeepscuba.com.au...
paleoshilling.nl...
You can listen to the alleged audio discussion on this third giant here:
giantology.typepad.com...
These all turned out to be a marketing scheme to promote a new video game, Shadow Of The Colossus:
www.us.playstation.com...
Originally posted by Centrist
Are we being fed authentic information with as much plausible deniability as possible? Are we being "authentic" disinformation as part of some agenda? Are we being fed disinformation believed by the "insider" to be authentic? Is someone out there trying to perpetrate a hoax?
Originally posted by Jedi_Master
Well tell you what, the calc's were a "new fangled gadget" at the time ( even if trhey could get them in time), these people were going on a mission with a weight limit of 4.5 tons...
Now which would you do...
Take an untried calculator that could possibly break, or have other issues in design (hey remember the Pentiums with the floating point problem?), they already had the tried and true method that they were used to (the slide rules)?
Or would you chuck it and make room for something you could use, like a scientific microscope, or other measuring type equipment?
Originally posted by waffleprime
so basically..every flaw we've tried to uncover with serpo has been defeated in someway or another.
Originally posted by sdrumrunner
Originally posted by waffleprime
so basically..every flaw we've tried to uncover with serpo has been defeated in someway or another.
Not quite... no one is yet to adequately address the issues of orbital stability with regards to Serpo's described orbit and respective distance from a suppesdly as-of-yet discovered close binary system.
Question for Bill
However, I believe Bill put forth a testable theory describing a theoretical orbit for Serpo -- Bill, would you allow for us to shop it around and invite the particpation of members with a background in astronomy and/or astrophysics?
There are other areas of contention as well (e.g., travel time, measured time), though I personally believe there exists for each plausible, theoretical explanations which would account for them (a subject best saved for another post).
Originally posted by Bill Ryan
I did find a solution that worked (in theory) with all the data Anon gave... Subsequently, I nearly drove myself nuts trying to do the calculus to figure whether the orbit would be stable. My conclusion was that I think it would probably not be (but would not bet more than $10 on it). My astrophysicist contact was impressed, but he too thought it might not be stable.
Originally posted by sdrumrunner
Originally posted by Bill Ryan
I did find a solution that worked (in theory) with all the data Anon gave... Subsequently, I nearly drove myself nuts trying to do the calculus to figure whether the orbit would be stable. My conclusion was that I think it would probably not be (but would not bet more than $10 on it). My astrophysicist contact was impressed, but he too thought it might not be stable.
Hi Bill,
Yes, this is indeed the orbital theory I am speaking of -- and yes, the orthogonal axis of rotation is a clever solution.
Speaking of which, with regards to the gentleman who has put together the orbital simulation page (to which you provide a link in your previous post), aren't those orbital simulations in 2-space?
I can imagine the mathematics involving a stable orbit of a close binary system in 3-space would be rather complex... Would you be willing to share your work to date?
I think the key to validating this described orbit does indeed lie within the mathematics. Once an equation descriptive of the theoretical orbit has been defined, it can be tested (as I believe a stable orbit would result in a net gravitational force of zero).
Your thoughts?
Best Regards,
sdrumrunner
Originally posted by sdrumrunner
While I do find it interesting that the team would not have loaded a scientific microscope, let us remember there were, according to the story, only two scientists on the entire team.
Whose to say the US Military would have prioritized a biologist for such a trip in 1964?
It would be another year before Sturtevant would publish A History of Genetics.
IMHO, I would think the mission planners would likely have placed greater importance on issues involving astrophysics, aeronautics, and nuclear science, as from a military perspective, one would think a higher priority would be focused on technology with defense-related applications that could eventually allow for a return trip (at which time they could study the Serpo biology).
Regarding the decision to take a scientific calculator (a valuable tool in the aforementioned disciplines, BTW), remember that the events in this story supposedly occurred only five years removed from successfully sending man to the moon... and retunring him alive. And considering the SR-71 -- a rather complicated feat of aeronautical engineering -- first flew in 1964, I think they could probably have handled the successful roll-out of a calculator.
Lastly, the figure was amended to 45.25 tons, more than enough to allow for several scientific calculators (as well as a slide rule, an abacus, and a whole lot of pencils and paper!).
[edit on 16-1-2006 by sdrumrunner]
Originally posted by exsmokingman
the ebens fought a war with another race completely destroying them? according to the documents on the serpo site they did that 1000 years before they became a spacefaring race. so logically, the opposition was either another local race sharing their planet or off-worlders who were silly enough to all come to the eben's world at once to be utterly destroyed.of-course the date mix-up could be a typo.either way we don't want to piss the eben's off, lol.
Originally posted by exsmokingman
the ebens fought a war with another race completely destroying them? according to the documents on the serpo site they did that 1000 years before they became a spacefaring race. so logically, the opposition was either another local race sharing their planet or off-worlders who were silly enough to all come to the eben's world at once to be utterly destroyed.of-course the date mix-up could be a typo.either way we don't want to piss the eben's off, lol.
Originally posted by Jedi_Master
Originally posted by sdrumrunner
Regarding the decision to take a scientific calculator (a valuable tool in the aforementioned disciplines, BTW), remember that the events in this story supposedly occurred only five years removed from successfully sending man to the moon... and retunring him alive. And considering the SR-71 -- a rather complicated feat of aeronautical engineering -- first flew in 1964, I think they could probably have handled the successful roll-out of a calculator.
Lastly, the figure was amended to 45.25 tons, more than enough to allow for several scientific calculators (as well as a slide rule, an abacus, and a whole lot of pencils and paper!).
I guess you're missing my point entirely...
You are taking a peice of equipment, newly invented ( actually the true scientific calc' was introduced in January of 1965), on a mission far away from any tech support or spare parts ( be one heck of a long distance call to Tech support if anything went wrong with it ), to do something you can already do with the slide rules and charts...
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Here's an interesting look at this amazing thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
It shows all the post, in "low-bandwidth" mode, on one single (very long) page.
Originally posted by mbkennel
One constraint on these weird orbits: the average distance from planet to suns cannot change a huge amount, otherwise the climate would be far too unstable for comfortable habitation.
On Earth the mere fact of the seasons (tilt of rotational axis) causes a significant fluctuation, even though the distance from Earth to our Sun changes only a small amount.