Wyoming Sorority Forced to Accept Man Who Claims to be Transgender

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?

Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.

I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.

What's sick are you guys going off on a tangent without reading the facts.

The sorority sisters who sued said Langford's presence in their sorority house made them uncomfortable. But while the lawsuit portrayed Langford as a "sexual predator," claims about her behavior turned out to be a "nothing more than a drunken rumor," Berkness said.

www.cbsnews.com...

You guys are believing in a drunken rumor instead of facts. That's why they are not accusing this transwoman of sexual harassment because there is none.

What laws allow men in women's spaces??

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?

Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.

I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.

What's sick are you guys going off on a tangent without reading the facts.

The sorority sisters who sued said Langford's presence in their sorority house made them uncomfortable. But while the lawsuit portrayed Langford as a "sexual predator," claims about her behavior turned out to be a "nothing more than a drunken rumor," Berkness said.

www.cbsnews.com...

You guys are believing in a drunken rumor instead of facts. That's why they are not accusing this transwoman of sexual harassment because there is none.

What laws allow men in women's spaces??

The laws of the university obviously who do not define what a woman is.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?

Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.

I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.

What's sick are you guys going off on a tangent without reading the facts.

The sorority sisters who sued said Langford's presence in their sorority house made them uncomfortable. But while the lawsuit portrayed Langford as a "sexual predator," claims about her behavior turned out to be a "nothing more than a drunken rumor," Berkness said.

www.cbsnews.com...

You guys are believing in a drunken rumor instead of facts. That's why they are not accusing this transwoman of sexual harassment because there is none.

What laws allow men in women's spaces??

The laws of the university obviously who do not define what a woman is.

Universities don't have their own 'laws'.
Again, what laws allow men in women's spaces?
I suppose you know the distinction between law, rule, regulation.

If unis didn't know what a woman is then should we have witnessed several men in sororities over the years?

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?

Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.

I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.

What's sick are you guys going off on a tangent without reading the facts.

The sorority sisters who sued said Langford's presence in their sorority house made them uncomfortable. But while the lawsuit portrayed Langford as a "sexual predator," claims about her behavior turned out to be a "nothing more than a drunken rumor," Berkness said.

www.cbsnews.com...

You guys are believing in a drunken rumor instead of facts. That's why they are not accusing this transwoman of sexual harassment because there is none.

What laws allow men in women's spaces??

The laws of the university obviously who do not define what a woman is.

Universities don't have their own 'laws'.
Again, what laws allow men in women's spaces?
I suppose you know the distinction between law, rule, regulation.

If unis didn't know what a woman is then should we have witnessed several men in sororities over the years?

That's why the judge would not touch this case because the uni. does not define what a woman is, so whether you want to say they make up their own rules, law, policies ... whatever ... the judge referred to the uni.'s lead.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?

Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.

I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.

What's sick are you guys going off on a tangent without reading the facts.

The sorority sisters who sued said Langford's presence in their sorority house made them uncomfortable. But while the lawsuit portrayed Langford as a "sexual predator," claims about her behavior turned out to be a "nothing more than a drunken rumor," Berkness said.

www.cbsnews.com...

You guys are believing in a drunken rumor instead of facts. That's why they are not accusing this transwoman of sexual harassment because there is none.

What laws allow men in women's spaces??

The laws of the university obviously who do not define what a woman is.

Universities don't have their own 'laws'.
Again, what laws allow men in women's spaces?
I suppose you know the distinction between law, rule, regulation.

If unis didn't know what a woman is then should we have witnessed several men in sororities over the years?

That's why the judge would not touch this case because the uni. does not define what a woman is, so whether you want to say they make up their own rules, law, policies ... whatever ... the judge referred to the uni.'s lead.

But universities don't have their own laws and they don't get to define what a woman is. Neither anyone else but still know what a woman is.

If unis didn't know what a woman is then should we have witnessed several men in sororities over the years? Why we haven't?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
If that were true they could have the person kicked out easily for sexual harassment, man or woman. Where's the proof?

So the women who are being harassed are now liars?
No they can't easily have him kicked out ... obviously.
It's sick that you back the man in this. But I'm not surprised.

Asking for proof is not calling anyone liars. Bring their case to the uni., follow the sexual harassment protocols and lickity split the offending transwoman will be ejected. Am I not right? Strange that they haven't done this.

You mean like what happened during Cavanaugh's appointment, that kind of proof?

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?

Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.

I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.

What's sick are you guys going off on a tangent without reading the facts.

The sorority sisters who sued said Langford's presence in their sorority house made them uncomfortable. But while the lawsuit portrayed Langford as a "sexual predator," claims about her behavior turned out to be a "nothing more than a drunken rumor," Berkness said.

www.cbsnews.com...

You guys are believing in a drunken rumor instead of facts. That's why they are not accusing this transwoman of sexual harassment because there is none.

What laws allow men in women's spaces??

The laws of the university obviously who do not define what a woman is.

Universities don't have their own 'laws'.
Again, what laws allow men in women's spaces?
I suppose you know the distinction between law, rule, regulation.

If unis didn't know what a woman is then should we have witnessed several men in sororities over the years?

That's why the judge would not touch this case because the uni. does not define what a woman is, so whether you want to say they make up their own rules, law, policies ... whatever ... the judge referred to the uni.'s lead.

But universities don't have their own laws and they don't get to define what a woman is. Neither anyone else but still know what a woman is.

If unis didn't know what a woman is then should we have witnessed several men in sororities over the years? Why we haven't?

This one did not define what a woman is, they DID NOT DEFINE WHAT A WOMAN IS. They can make their own rules which obviously trumps laws in court.

Just saw this story on the TV News. The woman stand by their claims of being harassed ... this man stared at them, and watched while undressing, all with a woodie. They are continuing the legal battle to be rid of the man and now the women are being harassed by the college for being anti-trans. Just like I said they would. The Trans warriors have zero common sense. You don't let a biological man live in a sorority house, especially a biological man who is a perv who watches them and gets woodies.

originally posted by: FlyersFan
Just saw this story on the TV News. The woman stand by their claims of being harassed ... this man stared at them, and watched while undressing, all with a woodie. They are continuing the legal battle to be rid of the man and now the women are being harassed by the college for being anti-trans. Just like I said they would. The Trans warriors have zero common sense. You don't let a biological man live in a sorority house, especially a biological man who is a perv who watches them and gets woodies.

Innocent until proven guilty. Easy to show guilt by filming this transwoman in action.

originally posted by: quintessentone
Why does everyone want to demonize LGBTQ?

Oh brother. You are doing exactly what I said the left would do. These women are being harassed ... a MAN is living in their house, staring at them and watching them undress, and getting a woodie while doing so. He is obviously NOT LGBTQ. He's a man getting his kicks. He's a perv. There is no 'demonization of LGBTQ'. Get real.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?

Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.

I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.

What's sick are you guys going off on a tangent without reading the facts.

The sorority sisters who sued said Langford's presence in their sorority house made them uncomfortable. But while the lawsuit portrayed Langford as a "sexual predator," claims about her behavior turned out to be a "nothing more than a drunken rumor," Berkness said.

www.cbsnews.com...

You guys are believing in a drunken rumor instead of facts. That's why they are not accusing this transwoman of sexual harassment because there is none.

What laws allow men in women's spaces??

The laws of the university obviously who do not define what a woman is.

Universities don't have their own 'laws'.
Again, what laws allow men in women's spaces?
I suppose you know the distinction between law, rule, regulation.

If unis didn't know what a woman is then should we have witnessed several men in sororities over the years?

That's why the judge would not touch this case because the uni. does not define what a woman is, so whether you want to say they make up their own rules, law, policies ... whatever ... the judge referred to the uni.'s lead.

But universities don't have their own laws and they don't get to define what a woman is. Neither anyone else but still know what a woman is.

If unis didn't know what a woman is then should we have witnessed several men in sororities over the years? Why we haven't?

This one did not define what a woman is, they DID NOT DEFINE WHAT A WOMAN IS. They can make their own rules which obviously trumps laws in court.

They don't need to and nor this is a reason for why a transwoman should be accepted in a sorority. Accordingly there should be many more in this sorority. But can you find any??

They can make their own rules which obviously trumps laws in court.

What are you talking about??
You seem to have no idea who can make laws in this country.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Why does everyone want to demonize LGBTQ?

Oh brother. You are doing exactly what I said the left would do. These women are being harassed ... a MAN is living in their house, staring at them and watching them undress, and getting a woodie while doing so. He is obviously NOT LGBTQ. He's a man getting his kicks. He's a perv. There is no 'demonization of LGBTQ'. Get real.

Heresay, no proof. This is persecution. I mean get real, how hard is it to videotape this person staring and getting a woody?

originally posted by: quintessentone
. Easy to show guilt by filming this transwoman in action.

You are being ridiculous. Get real. This MAN isn't going to let someone
film him getting his kicks watching the women undress. Pffft Absurd.

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?

Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.

I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.

What's sick are you guys going off on a tangent without reading the facts.

The sorority sisters who sued said Langford's presence in their sorority house made them uncomfortable. But while the lawsuit portrayed Langford as a "sexual predator," claims about her behavior turned out to be a "nothing more than a drunken rumor," Berkness said.

www.cbsnews.com...

You guys are believing in a drunken rumor instead of facts. That's why they are not accusing this transwoman of sexual harassment because there is none.

What laws allow men in women's spaces??

The laws of the university obviously who do not define what a woman is.

Universities don't have their own 'laws'.
Again, what laws allow men in women's spaces?
I suppose you know the distinction between law, rule, regulation.

If unis didn't know what a woman is then should we have witnessed several men in sororities over the years?

That's why the judge would not touch this case because the uni. does not define what a woman is, so whether you want to say they make up their own rules, law, policies ... whatever ... the judge referred to the uni.'s lead.

But universities don't have their own laws and they don't get to define what a woman is. Neither anyone else but still know what a woman is.

If unis didn't know what a woman is then should we have witnessed several men in sororities over the years? Why we haven't?

This one did not define what a woman is, they DID NOT DEFINE WHAT A WOMAN IS. They can make their own rules which obviously trumps laws in court.

They don't need to and nor this is a reason for why a transwoman should be accepted in a sorority. Accordingly there should be many more in this sorority. But can you find any??

They can make their own rules which obviously trumps laws in court.

What are you talking about??
You seem to have no idea who can make laws in this country.

Take it up with the judge.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
. Easy to show guilt by filming this transwoman in action.

You are being ridiculous. Get real. This MAN isn't going to let someone
film him getting his kicks watching the women undress. Pffft Absurd.

They could put hidden cameras around, they won't know.

originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, no proof. This is persecution.

The first hand testimony of the women is proof.
You are a trans warrior and have no regard for
the safety of the women.

I mean get real, how hard is it to videotape this person staring and getting a woody?

You get real. That is impossible.


This is a common sense situation and yet the left has no common sense.
They are too busy being LGBTQ warriors and have forgotten womens rights.
Like the right to be safe in a sorority with real women and no men with woodies.

I'm done discussing this. You are ridiculous.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, no proof. This is persecution.

The first hand testimony of the women is proof.
You are a trans warrior and have no regard for
the safety of the women.

I mean get real, how hard is it to videotape this person staring and getting a woody?

You get real. That is impossible.


This is a common sense situation and yet the left has no common sense.
They are too busy being LGBTQ warriors and have forgotten womens rights.
Like the right to be safe in a sorority with real women and no men with woodies.

I'm done discussing this. You are ridiculous.

Ditto.

a reply to: quintessentone

A man going on transition, will be in treatment, hormone treatments, these hormones decrease the size of the testicles and lower libido meaning no desire for sex, while limiting erections meaning no erections.

The girls complain included that the man was having erections while watching them, this means he was not in hormone treatments.

He is a pervert plain and simple, the present rules or lack of rules in the college allowed the man to infiltrate the women sorority.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: quintessentone

A man going on transition, will be in treatment, hormone treatments, these hormones decrease the size of the testicles and lower libido meaning no desire for sex, while limiting erections meaning no erections.

The girls complain included that the man was having erections while watching them, this means he was not in hormone treatments.

He is a pervert plain and simple, the present rules or lack of rules in the college allowed the man to infiltrate the women sorority.

Speculation. Persecution of this person. All they have to do is put hidden cameras around and catch them in the act. Bingo they are gone.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: quintessentone

A man going on transition, will be in treatment, hormone treatments, these hormones decrease the size of the testicles and lower libido meaning no desire for sex, while limiting erections meaning no erections.

The girls complain included that the man was having erections while watching them, this means he was not in hormone treatments.

He is a pervert plain and simple, the present rules or lack of rules in the college allowed the man to infiltrate the women sorority.

Speculation. Persecution of this person. All they have to do is put hidden cameras around and catch them in the act. Bingo they are gone.

It’s her girl penis. Get with the program.