Wyoming Sorority Forced to Accept Man Who Claims to be Transgender

originally posted by: quintessentone
If that were true they could have the person kicked out easily for sexual harassment, man or woman. Where's the proof?

So the women who are being harassed are now liars?
No they can't easily have him kicked out ... obviously.
It's sick that you back the man in this. But I'm not surprised.

originally posted by: wdkirk
Gutless coward of a judge.

He said it was because the sorority didn't define what a woman was.
These women are in immediate danger from a predator.
There should be some recourse for them with the university.
But then again, the screaming and scare tactics from the left and the 'woke'
probably scare the judge and the university from doing anything at all.

This is so sick.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
If that were true they could have the person kicked out easily for sexual harassment, man or woman. Where's the proof?

So the women who are being harassed are now liars?
No they can't easily have him kicked out ... obviously.
It's sick that you back the man in this. But I'm not surprised.

Asking for proof is not calling anyone liars. Bring their case to the uni., follow the sexual harassment protocols and lickity split the offending transwoman will be ejected. Am I not right? Strange that they haven't done this.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: marg6043
If the man is getting sexual arouse around these girls it means only one thing, he is not taking any hormones, he is intact.

He is a predator and a pervert, the girls families should be suing the college.

^^ That. He's a predator getting off on them. Those girls have to go to sleep at night with him lurking around getting a woodie watching them sleep. It's just not right.

If that were true they could have the person kicked out easily for sexual harassment, man or woman. Where's the proof?

www.uwyo.edu...

They don't need this kind of proof.
The fact this person is a man isn't proof enough he shouldn't be there with these girls or you have lost every perspective in life?

Men shouldn't in women's places.
Men should not participate in female sports.

These are the very basic.

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: marg6043
If the man is getting sexual arouse around these girls it means only one thing, he is not taking any hormones, he is intact.

He is a predator and a pervert, the girls families should be suing the college.

^^ That. He's a predator getting off on them. Those girls have to go to sleep at night with him lurking around getting a woodie watching them sleep. It's just not right.

If that were true they could have the person kicked out easily for sexual harassment, man or woman. Where's the proof?

www.uwyo.edu...

They don't need this kind of proof.
The fact this person is a man isn't proof enough he shouldn't be there with these girls or you have lost every perspective in life?

Men shouldn't in women's places.
Men should not participate in female sports.

These are the very basic.

Of course they need proof as the uni. sexual harassment committee will need something to go on to investigate the allegations. Isn't it something like "innocent until proven guilty"?

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: wdkirk
Gutless coward of a judge.

He said it was because the sorority didn't define what a woman was.
These women are in immediate danger from a predator.
There should be some recourse for them with the university.
But then again, the screaming and scare tactics from the left and the 'woke'
probably scare the judge and the university from doing anything at all.

This is so sick.

Yep. And the judge is a coward for not speaking the truth of the situation rather than hiding behind it.

At some point you have to make a stand as a moral person and say “not one step further”.

originally posted by: AlienBorg
The fact this person is a man isn't proof enough ...

.... A man who stares at them and watches them undress and gets a woodie.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: AlienBorg
The fact this person is a man isn't proof enough ...

.... A man who stares at them and watches them undress and gets a woodie.

Heresay, where's the proof?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: marg6043
If the man is getting sexual arouse around these girls it means only one thing, he is not taking any hormones, he is intact.

He is a predator and a pervert, the girls families should be suing the college.

^^ That. He's a predator getting off on them. Those girls have to go to sleep at night with him lurking around getting a woodie watching them sleep. It's just not right.

If that were true they could have the person kicked out easily for sexual harassment, man or woman. Where's the proof?

www.uwyo.edu...

They don't need this kind of proof.
The fact this person is a man isn't proof enough he shouldn't be there with these girls or you have lost every perspective in life?

Men shouldn't in women's places.
Men should not participate in female sports.

These are the very basic.

Of course they need proof as the uni. sexual harassment committee will need something to go on to investigate the allegations. Isn't it something like "innocent until proven guilty"?

No proof for anything at this point.
The man shouldn't be there in the first place as he has no business in women's spaces.

originally posted by: quintessentone
follow the sexual harassment protocols and lickity split the offending transwoman will be ejected. Am I not right? .

You are wrong. The man, and the warriors on the left, will just claim transphobia and that the women are liars ... and the school will back down ... and the pervert will get to stay right where he is, woodie and all. That's how these things go down.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: AlienBorg
The fact this person is a man isn't proof enough ...

.... A man who stares at them and watches them undress and gets a woodie.

Heresay, where's the proof?

Where is the proof this person is a woman and should be in women's spaces?

Do you say transwomen are women?

originally posted by: wdkirk

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: wdkirk
Gutless coward of a judge.

He said it was because the sorority didn't define what a woman was.
These women are in immediate danger from a predator.
There should be some recourse for them with the university.
But then again, the screaming and scare tactics from the left and the 'woke'
probably scare the judge and the university from doing anything at all.

This is so sick.

Yep. And the judge is a coward for not speaking the truth of the situation rather than hiding behind it.

At some point you have to make a stand as a moral person and say “not one step further”.

The state can make a case if he/she is incompetent and remove him/her. 20 years ago this would have been unthinkable. He/she must be fired

originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?

Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
follow the sexual harassment protocols and lickity split the offending transwoman will be ejected. Am I not right? .

You are wrong. The man, and the warriors on the left, will just claim transphobia and that the women are liars ... and the school will back down ... and the pervert will get to stay right where he is, woodie and all. That's how these things go down.

That uni. has a strict sexual harassment policy. Ask yourselves this, why aren't these students making accusations of this transwoman to the sexual harassment committee?

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: AlienBorg
The fact this person is a man isn't proof enough ...

.... A man who stares at them and watches them undress and gets a woodie.

Heresay, where's the proof?

Where is the proof this person is a woman and should be in women's spaces?

Do you say transwomen are women?

I say the uni. does not define what a woman is, and so here they all are.

originally posted by: quintessentone
why aren't these students making accusations of this transwoman to the sexual harassment committee?

Who says they aren't? And it's not a transwoman.
It's a man with a woodie who gets off viewing them.
He's claiming to be TRANS so he can get in the house
and get his jollies. And TRANS warriors defend him.
Sick.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: AlienBorg
The fact this person is a man isn't proof enough ...

.... A man who stares at them and watches them undress and gets a woodie.

Heresay, where's the proof?

Where is the proof this person is a woman and should be in women's spaces?

Do you say transwomen are women?

I say the uni. does not define what a woman is, and so here they all are.

They don't have to. They can open the dictionary and learn the definition. Since when men are allowed in women's places?? If what you're saying was true then all sororities will be having a range of men trying to find their way through them. But they don't as unis know well what a woman is.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?

Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.

I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.

What's sick are you guys going off on a tangent without reading the facts.

The sorority sisters who sued said Langford's presence in their sorority house made them uncomfortable. But while the lawsuit portrayed Langford as a "sexual predator," claims about her behavior turned out to be a "nothing more than a drunken rumor," Berkness said.

www.cbsnews.com...

You guys are believing in a drunken rumor instead of facts. That's why they are not accusing this transwoman of sexual harassment because there is none.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?

Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.

I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.

Why do you feel you need to be the spokesperson for trans people ? Why don’t you leave the kids alone ? Anyone who thinks kids should mutilate themselves should be tarred and feathered and brought up and made to answer why they want to mutilate kids ? So why do you want to mutilate kids ?

originally posted by: Stopthebull

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?

Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.

I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.

Why do you feel you need to be the spokesperson for trans people ? Why don’t you leave the kids alone ? Anyone who thinks kids should mutilate themselves should be tarred and feathered and brought up and made to answer why they want to mutilate kids ? So why do you want to mutilate kids ?

Why does everyone want to demonize LGBTQ? I don't get it. And I'm asking legit questions and posting facts. The sexual harassment part turned out to be a drunken rumor.