It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: AlienBorg
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: AlienBorg
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: AlienBorg
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: AlienBorg
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?
Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.
I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.
What's sick are you guys going off on a tangent without reading the facts.
The sorority sisters who sued said Langford's presence in their sorority house made them uncomfortable. But while the lawsuit portrayed Langford as a "sexual predator," claims about her behavior turned out to be a "nothing more than a drunken rumor," Berkness said.
www.cbsnews.com...
You guys are believing in a drunken rumor instead of facts. That's why they are not accusing this transwoman of sexual harassment because there is none.
What laws allow men in women's spaces??
The laws of the university obviously who do not define what a woman is.
Universities don't have their own 'laws'.
Again, what laws allow men in women's spaces?
I suppose you know the distinction between law, rule, regulation.
If unis didn't know what a woman is then should we have witnessed several men in sororities over the years?
That's why the judge would not touch this case because the uni. does not define what a woman is, so whether you want to say they make up their own rules, law, policies ... whatever ... the judge referred to the uni.'s lead.
But universities don't have their own laws and they don't get to define what a woman is. Neither anyone else but still know what a woman is.
If unis didn't know what a woman is then should we have witnessed several men in sororities over the years? Why we haven't?
This one did not define what a woman is, they DID NOT DEFINE WHAT A WOMAN IS. They can make their own rules which obviously trumps laws in court.
They don't need to and nor this is a reason for why a transwoman should be accepted in a sorority. Accordingly there should be many more in this sorority. But can you find any??
They can make their own rules which obviously trumps laws in court.
What are you talking about??
You seem to have no idea who can make laws in this country.
Take it up with the judge.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: quintessentone
A man going on transition, will be in treatment, hormone treatments, these hormones decrease the size of the testicles and lower libido meaning no desire for sex, while limiting erections meaning no erections.
The girls complain included that the man was having erections while watching them, this means he was not in hormone treatments.
He is a pervert plain and simple, the present rules or lack of rules in the college allowed the man to infiltrate the women sorority.
Speculation. Persecution of this person. All they have to do is put hidden cameras around and catch them in the act. Bingo they are gone.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, no proof. This is persecution.
The first hand testimony of the women is proof.
You are a trans warrior and have no regard for
the safety of the women.
I mean get real, how hard is it to videotape this person staring and getting a woody?
You get real. That is impossible.
This is a common sense situation and yet the left has no common sense.
They are too busy being LGBTQ warriors and have forgotten womens rights.
Like the right to be safe in a sorority with real women and no men with woodies.
I'm done discussing this. You are ridiculous.
originally posted by: stevieray
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: stevieray
The frequent appearance of boners should be the smoking gun …..
He's a sexual predator pretending to be a trans woman.
The real women in the sorority house are not safe with him around.
A woman or women will be raped.
Said it here first.
As I’ve already said too many times -
Where the F are these girls’ dads, brothers, uncles ?
This silly SOB faker should accidentally fall down about 25 times behind the house. Nobody knows how or why. Repeat until the schmuck decides he would really enjoy living elsewhere.
This is all that’s left. Every traditional recourse is now fully corrupted and idiotic.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Stopthebull
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?
Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.
I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.
Why do you feel you need to be the spokesperson for trans people ? Why don’t you leave the kids alone ? Anyone who thinks kids should mutilate themselves should be tarred and feathered and brought up and made to answer why they want to mutilate kids ? So why do you want to mutilate kids ?
Why does everyone want to demonize LGBTQ? I don't get it. And I'm asking legit questions and posting facts. The sexual harassment part turned out to be a drunken rumor.
Fat boy scammer for the win.
originally posted by: Stopthebull
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Stopthebull
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?
Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.
I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.
Why do you feel you need to be the spokesperson for trans people ? Why don’t you leave the kids alone ? Anyone who thinks kids should mutilate themselves should be tarred and feathered and brought up and made to answer why they want to mutilate kids ? So why do you want to mutilate kids ?
Why does everyone want to demonize LGBTQ? I don't get it. And I'm asking legit questions and posting facts. The sexual harassment part turned out to be a drunken rumor.
I asked you a few questions???
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Stopthebull
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Stopthebull
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?
Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.
I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.
Why do you feel you need to be the spokesperson for trans people ? Why don’t you leave the kids alone ? Anyone who thinks kids should mutilate themselves should be tarred and feathered and brought up and made to answer why they want to mutilate kids ? So why do you want to mutilate kids ?
Why does everyone want to demonize LGBTQ? I don't get it. And I'm asking legit questions and posting facts. The sexual harassment part turned out to be a drunken rumor.
I asked you a few questions???
Those aren't questions they are accusations.
Here's a few questions why during the court case did the girls not claim sexual harassment rather than the transwoman made them feel 'vulnerable' due to past sexual harassment from other people? After the court case now these six girls claim sexual harassment?
There are more than six girls in that sorority, why aren't the others stepping up to corroborate their accusations?
originally posted by: AlienBorg
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Stopthebull
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Stopthebull
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?
Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.
I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.
Why do you feel you need to be the spokesperson for trans people ? Why don’t you leave the kids alone ? Anyone who thinks kids should mutilate themselves should be tarred and feathered and brought up and made to answer why they want to mutilate kids ? So why do you want to mutilate kids ?
Why does everyone want to demonize LGBTQ? I don't get it. And I'm asking legit questions and posting facts. The sexual harassment part turned out to be a drunken rumor.
I asked you a few questions???
Those aren't questions they are accusations.
Here's a few questions why during the court case did the girls not claim sexual harassment rather than the transwoman made them feel 'vulnerable' due to past sexual harassment from other people? After the court case now these six girls claim sexual harassment?
There are more than six girls in that sorority, why aren't the others stepping up to corroborate their accusations?
You forget that men shouldn't be in women's places. Start with this and then the rest can be examined.
You're question is misleading btw.
Women may be afraid to accuse men of whatever sexual harassment and other related offenses and they may don't want publicity and trouble over this matter.
But better start from the fact that men shouldn't be in women's places.
And a transwoman is a woman by the way.
If you go about the judge or the uni not being able to define what a woman is, you know this is a refuted claim you made yesterday trying to push some trans propaganda.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: AlienBorg
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Stopthebull
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Stopthebull
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?
Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.
I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.
Why do you feel you need to be the spokesperson for trans people ? Why don’t you leave the kids alone ? Anyone who thinks kids should mutilate themselves should be tarred and feathered and brought up and made to answer why they want to mutilate kids ? So why do you want to mutilate kids ?
Why does everyone want to demonize LGBTQ? I don't get it. And I'm asking legit questions and posting facts. The sexual harassment part turned out to be a drunken rumor.
I asked you a few questions???
Those aren't questions they are accusations.
Here's a few questions why during the court case did the girls not claim sexual harassment rather than the transwoman made them feel 'vulnerable' due to past sexual harassment from other people? After the court case now these six girls claim sexual harassment?
There are more than six girls in that sorority, why aren't the others stepping up to corroborate their accusations?
You forget that men shouldn't be in women's places. Start with this and then the rest can be examined.
You're question is misleading btw.
Women may be afraid to accuse men of whatever sexual harassment and other related offenses and they may don't want publicity and trouble over this matter.
But better start from the fact that men shouldn't be in women's places.
And a transwoman is a woman by the way.
If you go about the judge or the uni not being able to define what a woman is, you know this is a refuted claim you made yesterday trying to push some trans propaganda.
Let's start with why only six of the sorority members have issues and the others do not.
originally posted by: marg6043
Woman sororities, sports and their role in society is under attack with the blessings of a very mentally sick government.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: AlienBorg
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Stopthebull
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Stopthebull
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?
Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.
I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.
Why do you feel you need to be the spokesperson for trans people ? Why don’t you leave the kids alone ? Anyone who thinks kids should mutilate themselves should be tarred and feathered and brought up and made to answer why they want to mutilate kids ? So why do you want to mutilate kids ?
Why does everyone want to demonize LGBTQ? I don't get it. And I'm asking legit questions and posting facts. The sexual harassment part turned out to be a drunken rumor.
I asked you a few questions???
Those aren't questions they are accusations.
Here's a few questions why during the court case did the girls not claim sexual harassment rather than the transwoman made them feel 'vulnerable' due to past sexual harassment from other people? After the court case now these six girls claim sexual harassment?
There are more than six girls in that sorority, why aren't the others stepping up to corroborate their accusations?
You forget that men shouldn't be in women's places. Start with this and then the rest can be examined.
You're question is misleading btw.
Women may be afraid to accuse men of whatever sexual harassment and other related offenses and they may don't want publicity and trouble over this matter.
But better start from the fact that men shouldn't be in women's places.
And a transwoman is a woman by the way.
If you go about the judge or the uni not being able to define what a woman is, you know this is a refuted claim you made yesterday trying to push some trans propaganda.
Let's start with why only six of the sorority members have issues and the others do not.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: AlienBorg
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Stopthebull
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Stopthebull
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: quintessentone
Heresay, where's the proof?
Defending the sexual predator. I'm not surprised.
The PROOF is the eye witness account of the mans behavior.
So much for 'lickity split the perv will be ejected'.
Sick.
I'm defending the law. Innocent until proven guilty. Prove the guilt.
Why do you feel you need to be the spokesperson for trans people ? Why don’t you leave the kids alone ? Anyone who thinks kids should mutilate themselves should be tarred and feathered and brought up and made to answer why they want to mutilate kids ? So why do you want to mutilate kids ?
Why does everyone want to demonize LGBTQ? I don't get it. And I'm asking legit questions and posting facts. The sexual harassment part turned out to be a drunken rumor.
I asked you a few questions???
Those aren't questions they are accusations.
Here's a few questions why during the court case did the girls not claim sexual harassment rather than the transwoman made them feel 'vulnerable' due to past sexual harassment from other people? After the court case now these six girls claim sexual harassment?
There are more than six girls in that sorority, why aren't the others stepping up to corroborate their accusations?
You forget that men shouldn't be in women's places. Start with this and then the rest can be examined.
You're question is misleading btw.
Women may be afraid to accuse men of whatever sexual harassment and other related offenses and they may don't want publicity and trouble over this matter.
But better start from the fact that men shouldn't be in women's places.
And a transwoman is a woman by the way.
If you go about the judge or the uni not being able to define what a woman is, you know this is a refuted claim you made yesterday trying to push some trans propaganda.
Let's start with why only six of the sorority members have issues and the others do not.
what evidence do you have that the rest of the sorority do not have issues with this?